Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Unknown

From: Defendants (Troutman S...
To: Court

Referenced in the text as setting forth reasons to deny Plaintiff's request.

Letter
2020-05-08
Communication Source

Response to Plaintiff's motion

From: defendants
To: Court

Defendants filed a letter (ECF No. 47) calling the request a waste of time.

Letter
2020-05-08
Communication Source

Request for pre-motion conference

From: plaintiff
To: Court

Referenced in the text as a letter raising substantive issues.

Letter
2020-05-07
Communication Source

Pre-motion conference

From: Court
To: Counsel

Transcript referenced where Judge Schofield advised against filing motion to dismiss.

Meeting
2020-04-16
Communication Source

Pre-motion letters

From: Parties
To: Court

Referenced as ECF Nos. 25, 26

Letter
2020-04-02
Communication Source

Pre-motion letters

From: Parties (Plaintiff/Def...
To: Court

Pre-motion letters referenced as ECF Nos. 13 and 14.

Letter
2020-02-24
Communication Source

Request for pre-motion conference

From: defendant
To: Court

Defendant requested a pre-motion conference (dkt. no. 24).

Filing
2020-02-12
Communication Source

Opposition to Adjournment

From: Government officials
To: Court

Government agreed a brief adjournment was appropriate but opposed a six-month delay.

Written submission
2020-01-30
Communication Source

Adjournment Request

From: defense
To: Court

A letter referenced by the court in which the defense requested an adjournment of the trial.

Letter
2020-01-30
Communication Source

Partial Motion to Dismiss

From: Executor
To: Court

Motion to dismiss prayer for punitive damages.

Legal filing
2020-01-21
Communication Source

United States v. Tartaglione

From: Tartaglione's defense ...
To: Court

Letter regarding potential penalty phase.

Letter
2020-01-21
Communication Source

Request for discovery schedule

From: parties to the cases
To: Court

Parties requested that the Court set a discovery schedule.

Submissions
2020-01-10
Communication Source

Request for discovery schedule

From: parties
To: Court

Parties requested that the Court set a discovery schedule.

Submission
2020-01-10
Communication Source

Status of Video

From: Government officials
To: Court

Admitted MCC inadvertently preserved video from the wrong tier and the correct video no longer exists due to backup system errors.

Letter
2020-01-09
Communication Source

Civil Lawsuit

From: Jane's attorney
To: Court

Lawsuit signed by attorney.

Legal document
2020-01-01
Communication Source

Status of Video

From: Government officials
To: Court

Claimed prosecutors confirmed with MCC staff that video was preserved and they were obtaining a copy.

Letter
2019-12-19
Communication Source

Status of Video

From: Government officials
To: Court

Stated video had not been preserved but they were working with BOP to determine status.

Court proceedings
2019-12-18
Communication Source

Discovery stay

From: Court
To: Parties

Court made clear discovery would not be stayed.

Conference transcript
2019-11-21
Communication Source

Complaint

From: Mary Doe
To: Court

Complaint filed alleging sexual and psychological abuse.

Legal filing
2019-11-20
Communication Source

Contact Restriction

From: Court
To: defendant

NO CONTACT WITH CO-DEFENDANT UNLESS IN THE PRESENCE OF COUNSEL

Restriction
2019-11-19
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statement

From: unidentified speaker
To: Court

Speaker describes the trauma caused by Epstein, the disappointment regarding his suicide preventing a trial, and declares herself a survivor.

Meeting
2019-09-03
Communication Source

Application to be moved from MCC

From: Nicholas Tartaglione's...
To: Court

Request for transfer due to deplorable conditions and threats.

Application
2019-08-20
Communication Source

Notice of Appearance

From: Martin G. Weinberg
To: Court

Formal notice that Martin G. Weinberg is joining as additional counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal filing
2019-08-05
Communication Source

Fear for safety

From: Annie Farmer
To: Court

Testified fearing for safety if Epstein is released.

Court testimony
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Fear for safety

From: Courtney Wild
To: Court

Testified fearing for safety if Epstein is released.

Court testimony
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search