Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Defense counsel (implied)

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
2
Events
6
Documents
0
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
5
1
View
person Andrew Rohrbach, Lara Pomerantz, Alison Moe, Maureen Comey
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2023-02-28 N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements and objections (Case 22-1426). Courtroom (likely SDNY or S... View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during trial testimony Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-07-22 N/A Filing of the court transcript (Page 40 of 101). Southern District Court (Ne... View
2021-01-28 N/A Deadline to submit a letter to Judge Nathan regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-... Southern District of New York View
2008-03-01 N/A Meeting regarding the case arguments. Unknown View
0026-06-01 N/A Meeting regarding the case strategy or negotiations. Unspecified View
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
37
As Recipient
3
Total
40

Protective Orders / Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument regarding the modification of protective orders and rebuttal of government suggestions regarding waiver.

Letter
2020-08-24
Communication Source

Reply regarding sealed materials and protective order

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Defense argues that sharing sealed materials with 'two arbiters' will not harm the ongoing criminal investigation and is necessary for civil litigation.

Letter
2020-08-24
Communication Source

Legal arguments regarding subpoenas and government conduct

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Arguments against government's characterization of Maxwell's actions and the issuance of subpoenas.

Letter
2020-08-24
Communication Source

Reply regarding government conduct and subpoenas

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Defense argues against government's characterization of Ms. Maxwell's actions and disputes the 'standard practice' of government subpoenas.

Letter
2020-08-24
Communication Source

Relevant Facts and Procedural History / Confidentiality D...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal arguments regarding the sealing of documents and contesting the government's 'Confidential' designation.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Request concerning Protective Order/Sealed Materials

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument regarding the Protective Order, discovery materials, and alleged government distribution of sealed orders.

Legal letter/filing
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Request for disclosure of victim identities (implied cont...

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Legal argument justifying the disclosure of the identities of Victims 1-3 to the defense team.

Letter
2020-08-10
Communication Source

Protective Order / Victim Identities

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument regarding the scope of a protective order concerning victim/witness identities, specifically regarding those who have already spoken publicly.

Letter
2020-07-27
Communication Source

Request for order prohibiting extrajudicial statements

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument that comments by Boies and McCawley violate rules and prejudice Maxwell's trial.

Legal filing
2020-07-21
Communication Source

Prejudicial statements by government and witness counsel

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Argument that comments by Sweeney, Boies, McCawley, and Edwards violate local rules.

Legal filing
2020-07-21
Communication Source

Rebuttal to government/third-party claims

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Hon. Richard M. Berman

Arguments regarding payments to witnesses and an expired Austrian passport.

Letter
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Bail Argument (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB)

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Hon. Richard M. Berman

Argument regarding statutory construction of bail laws, constitutional rights, and the treatment of wealthy defendants.

Legal filing/letter
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Bail/Release Argument (implied context)

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Hon. Richard M. Berman

Argument regarding flight risk, citing Epstein's return to the US despite media pressure and public outcry.

Letter
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Defense arguments regarding Epstein prosecution

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: Honorable Mark Filip

Arguments against federal prosecution citing witness testimony and lack of interstate commerce.

Letter/memorandum
2008-05-19
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search