LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00004745.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim dated June 15, 2021, detailing complaints regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It outlines specific incidents of alleged harassment and obstruction by prison guards, including the reading of privileged legal materials, denial of water, excessive monitoring during legal visits, and technical interference with video conferencing that compromises attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00002932.jpg
This document is the final page (page 8) of a legal filing submitted by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on April 15, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text serves as the conclusion to the filing, formally requesting a trial continuance in the 'interests of justice' prior to an arraignment scheduled for April 23rd. It bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002932.
DOJ-OGR-00002931.jpg
This is page 7 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim dated April 15, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues for a continuance (delay) of the trial due to a second superseding indictment which doubles Maxwell's sentencing exposure, while noting that continued detention prejudices the defendant. It also mentions an upcoming bail appeal hearing at the Second Circuit scheduled for April 26th.
DOJ-OGR-00002928.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated April 15, 2021, regarding the defense of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the defense needs significant time to review discovery material due to the immense volume (214,000 photos, 250,000 non-searchable documents) and the filing of a superseding indictment adding 'Accuser-4' and expanding the timeframe to the 2000s. It also notes technical difficulties experienced with an FBI-supplied laptop while attempting to review 2,100 'Highly Confidential' photographs with Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002925.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002740.jpg
This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002729.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan disputing the government's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The letter details excessive searches, lack of access to discovery materials, and argues that the strict surveillance is a reaction to BOP negligence regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020059.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00005665.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'Motion in Limine', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 29, 2021. The motion is filed on behalf of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose of the motion is to request the exclusion of evidence related to an individual identified as 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00005650.jpg
This legal document, dated April 23, 2021, is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves as a formal disclosure that the government may call Dr. Lisa Rocchio, a clinical psychologist specializing in trauma, as an expert witness in Maxwell's upcoming trial. The document outlines Dr. Rocchio's extensive qualifications, including her role at Brown University's Alpert Medical School and the American Psychological Association, and her decades of experience treating victims of trauma and sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00005647.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court filing (Document 386) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005625.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to exclude evidence based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the precedent set by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a hearing on the matter. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005620.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005595.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to prevent the prosecution from introducing statements from alleged co-conspirators. This request is framed as a sanction for the prosecution's purported failure to adhere to a court order issued on September 3, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005523.jpg
This document is a signature page from a court filing (Document 382) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document is respectfully submitted on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005391.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing (Document 378) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 27, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005386.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated October 27, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues that the government is prioritizing witness convenience over the prudence of seating a fair and impartial jury, characterizing the government's actions as seeking an 'undue and unreasonable advantage.'
DOJ-OGR-00005385.jpg
A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's request to finalize jury selection on November 19, preferring November 29 to account for potential COVID-19 exposure and biases arising during the Thanksgiving holiday break. The document highlights procedural disagreements between the defense and the government regarding trial scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00005383.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense accepts the Court's draft preliminary remarks for jurors but strongly objects to the government's request to delay providing the names of prospective jurors until the start of oral voir dire on November 16, 2021. Sternheim argues that the Court previously determined names would be provided with questionnaires and requests the Court deny the government's attempt to delay disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00005358.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'JOINT PROPOSED EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS' for the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Filed on October 22, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg
This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity