| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Markarian
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Post-verdict evidentiary hearing regarding Juror 50 | Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Public hearing regarding Juror 50's answers to questionnaire | Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Public Hearing involving Juror 50 | Courtroom 906, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Deadline for proposed questions submission | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Electronic submission of a motion with the Clerk of Court and service of copies to counsel for th... | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-25 | N/A | Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell filed a letter request for an in camera conference regarding bail a... | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-01-09 | N/A | Initial Pretrial Conference | Courtroom 1106, Thurgood Ma... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order following Epstein's death | Courtroom 17B, USDC SDNY | View |
| 2016-05-16 | N/A | Conferral regarding Punitive Damages requests; agreement to hold in abeyance. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Court Hearing where Plaintiff's counsel stated he would withdraw certain claims | US District Court Southern ... | View |
Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 3, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court approves the defendant's proposed redactions for letters dated November 25 and 30 regarding a renewed bail motion, citing the privacy interests of individuals mentioned in the letters. The court denies the request for an in camera conference but allows written submissions with tailored redactions and orders the parties to schedule briefing for the renewed bail motion.
This is a court order filed on December 3, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a request by Maxwell's defense counsel to seal letters related to a renewed motion for bail. The court approves the defense's proposed redactions, noting that the Government does not oppose them, based on legal standards regarding judicial documents and privacy interests.
This is a Certificate of Service from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated February 24, 2022. Lara Markarian, acting as Counsel for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, certifies that she electronically filed a motion with the Clerk of Court and served copies via email to counsel for the Defendant and the government.
Correspondence stating that pursuant to Rule 4-4.2, 'parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other'.
Second letter proposing redactions to Nov 25 and Nov 30 letters instead of full sealing.
Request seeking in camera conference for renewed bail motion and request to seal the letter.
Request seeking an in camera conference for renewed bail motion and request to seal the letter in its entirety.
Counsel conferred by telephone and correspondence regarding the requested extension.
Defense counsel conferred with Plaintiff's counsel regarding the extension; Plaintiff's counsel did not agree.
Conferred regarding extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Conferred regarding extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Conferred regarding the extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Certificate of Service via CM/ECF
Counsel conferred regarding the motion for extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Counsel conferred by telephone and correspondence regarding the requested extension of time until October 30, 2009.
Conferred regarding the requested extension until October 15, 2009.
Conferred regarding the requested extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Service of document via CM/ECF
Conferred regarding the requested extension; Plaintiff's counsel agreed.
Counsel conferred via telephone; Defendant has no objection to Plaintiff filing this notice.
Defendant has no objection to Plaintiff filing the Notice
Electronic service of the document via CM/ECF.
Conferred regarding extension request; Plaintiff counsel agreed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity