| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
25
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Everdell
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court hearing for appearances of counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | AFFIDAVIT of Bobbi C. Sternheim in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwell re 147 MOTION for Bill of Part... | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-04 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures by Defense. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-02-04 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Dismiss Counts One Through Four as Time-Barred | Court | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re MOTION to Dismiss Counts One Through Four... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | N/A | Filing of multiple motions by the defense and an Order by the Judge. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MOTION to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of Non-Prosecution Agreement. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MOTION to Strike Surplusage from Superseding Indictment. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re MOTION to Strike Surplusage from Supersed... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | N/A | Filing of multiple motions by Ghislaine Maxwell | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-02-04 | N/A | Filing of Memorandum in Support of Motion for Bill of Particulars | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | MOTION to Strike Surplusage from Superseding Indictment. (Filing 145) | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MOTION for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team filed a series of motions, including motions to suppress evidence,... | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re MOTION to Dismiss the Superseding Indictm... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Court filing | Filing of MOTION to Dismiss Counts One Through Four of the Superseding Indictment as Time-Barred. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-01-25 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell filed multiple motions to dismiss the superseding indictment. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1s,2s,3s,4s,5s-6s. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. ... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Ghislaine Maxwell was arraigned, pleaded Not Guilty to counts 1s-6s. Bail was denied, she was rem... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied, she wa... | S.D.N.Y. (via video confere... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She pleaded not guilty, bail was denied, and she was rema... | Court (via video conference... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied and de... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment. Defendant entered plea of Not Guilty. Trial set for July 12, 2021. | Video Conference / Telephone | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment: Defendant enters plea of Not Guilty to S1 indictment. | Video Conference | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment and Bail Hearing | Video Conference / Daniel P... | View |
This document is an email chain dated July 14, 2020, providing a detailed log of legal calls made by Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS No. 02879-509) between July 6 and July 14, 2020. The sender forwards this list to ensure that 'Mark' (likely Mark Cohen or opposing counsel) does not misrepresent Maxwell's access to counsel during an upcoming hearing. The log details dates, times, durations, and participants of the calls, which primarily include attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, as well as Lea Harmon from Pretrial Services.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team responding to a discovery request. The Government declines to produce broad FOIA-related documents citing lack of legal basis under Rule 16, but provides specific materials related to Radar Online and FBI-NY's involvement in the SDFL investigation as a courtesy. The letter also corrects a defense assertion regarding the FBI Florida office's role in the prosecution team.
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of materials stamped SDNY_GM_00274187 through SDNY_GM_0274302, which are identified in the index as a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated 12-15-2020. The document notes that the letter and materials are subject to a protective order.
A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter documents the production of materials designated as confidential, specifically referencing a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated December 15, 2020. The document indicates ongoing discovery obligations and mentions that physical items are in FBI custody.
This document is a formal notice from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 23, 2021. The Government notifies the defense of its intent to call Dr. Lisa Rocchio as an expert witness to testify on trauma psychology, the dynamics of sexual abuse, grooming, and delayed disclosure, though she has not evaluated specific victims in this case. The letter also reiterates requests for reciprocal discovery and disclosure of defense expert witnesses.
This document is a legal letter dated April 23, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It serves as a formal notice pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(G) that the Government intends to call a clinical expert witness (name redacted) to testify about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and the impact of trauma on minors. The letter outlines the scope of the expert's anticipated testimony and requests reciprocal discovery regarding any experts the defense intends to call.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 16 evidence discs labeled as 'Epstein Encase Files.' The government identified these discs as containing a forensic image of a computer seized from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2005. However, the government concluded that the original warrant authorized seizure but not the search of the computer's contents, and thus they lack the lawful authority to review the files or allow the defense to access them.
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, between government officials (likely DOJ and US Marshals) regarding the custody conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC shortly after her arrest. It outlines specific security protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and video monitoring, while also coordinating the approval for her to communicate with her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen.
This document contains an email chain from July 2020 regarding the custody protocols for Ghislaine Maxwell at the Merrimack Department of Corrections in New Hampshire. A Supervisory Deputy US Marshal outlines strict monitoring procedures, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and the stationing of SRT personnel. A subsequent email requests the addition of attorneys Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen to Maxwell's approved phone list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
This document is a letter dated October 13, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The Government asserts that Maxwell has waived her right to use an insanity or mental condition defense (Rule 12.2) because she failed to provide notice by the pretrial motion deadlines in early 2021. The letter demands that if the defense intends to use such evidence despite the waiver, they must provide notice by October 20, 2021.
This document contains an email chain between US Marshals Service officials regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in July 2020. The emails outline strict security protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a prohibition on staff conversation, and the deployment of SRT personnel. Additionally, there is a request to add attorneys Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen to her approved phone contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes specific directives from the US Marshals Service to Merrimack DOC regarding her housing in unit M1, 15-minute observation watches, prohibition of staff conversation, and video surveillance protocols. Additionally, the emails discuss a request to add her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her permitted contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
This document contains an email chain and a specific directive from the US Marshals Service regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in July 2020. The directive outlines strict monitoring protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, isolation in unit M1, and video recording requirements. The email chain discusses the logistical necessity of adding her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her permitted call list, which initially only included Lawrence Vogelman.
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in New Hampshire. It details strict monitoring protocols issued by the US Marshals Service, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and specific video surveillance procedures. Additionally, the emails discuss a request to add her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her approved telephone contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
A discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 11, 2021. The letter details the production of 'Amazon records' (Bates SDNY_GM_02771981-02771983) which were sourced from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and potentially duplicate materials previously produced from the Florida FBI file.
This document is a letter dated November 16, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a cover letter for the production of discovery materials, specifically AT&T records, phone records, and photographs, noting that these materials are subject to a protective order.
This document is a discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It details the production of 'SDFL Files' (likely Southern District of Florida files) with Bates numbers SDNY_GM_02767074 through SDNY_GM_02771980. The letter notes these materials are confidential under a protective order and appear to be duplicative of previous discovery.
A discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'Business Records from SDFL Files' (Bates SDNY_GM_02767074 - 02771980), which the government notes are likely duplicative of materials previously produced from Florida FBI files in 2020. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
This document is the final signature page (page 7 of 7) of a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, with copies sent to prosecutors at the SDNY (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey) and other defense counsel (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger).
Page 2 of a court filing (Document 9) dated July 7, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Assistant United States Attorneys (Rossmiller, Moe, Comey) inform Judge Nathan that they have conferred with defense counsel (Everdell and Cohen), who consent to a request regarding the timeline for discovery production.
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on July 5, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Attorney's office requests Judge Nathan exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the transportation of the defendant from another district and to facilitate discussions regarding a protective order to shield the identities of victims and third parties during discovery. Defense counsel consented to this request.
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, for a hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan. The transcript records the appearances of the legal counsel for both the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the U.S. government. The government's counsel also requests permission for staff from the U.S. Attorney's office to be dialed into the hearing due to technical issues with an overflow line from Connecticut.
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Discovery production letter regarding materials stamped SDNY_GM_00328070 through SDNY_GM_00356148, including FBI and PBPD documents.
Cover letter for discovery production including financial records from Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, UBS, and American Express.
12:00 pm call (1.5 hours)
FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise.
Forwarding the inquiry to Maxwell. States intention not to respond unless directed otherwise.
Stating no intention of responding unless directed otherwise.
Stating intention not to respond to the press inquiry unless directed otherwise.
Stating no intention to respond to the press inquiry unless directed otherwise.
FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise.
FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity