| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Lobbying |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Dave Camp
|
Chairman |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act)
|
Conflict |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Critic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Proposer reviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Professional advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Schoen
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi Aramco
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United Front Work Department
|
Personnel overlap |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
HM Land Registry
|
Service user provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Hong Kong recipients
|
Point of contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Miliband
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
LLC
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Xi Jinping
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi Red Crescent
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ray
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Brady
|
Witness testimony |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Hempmate Zurich AG
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Marshall L. Miller
|
Organizer member |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
House
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Firing of Professor Franklin | Stanford University | View |
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Public testimony by Dr. Blasey and Judge Kavanaugh is scheduled before the Senate Judiciary Commi... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Christine Blasey Ford is scheduled to testify before a Senate committee about her sexual assault ... | Unspecified (likely U.S. Ca... | View |
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Public testimony from Dr. Blasey was scheduled to take place. Judge Kavanaugh was also scheduled ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-16 | N/A | The Senate Judiciary Committee reached an agreement to hear public testimony from Christine Blase... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Processing of request for historical land registry documents. | Gloucester/Shropshire, UK | View |
| 2018-09-27 | N/A | A planned hearing for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hear from Dr. Blasey. | Not specified | View |
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | Scrutiny of Brett Kavanaugh's high school years during his Supreme Court nomination process. | Washington | View |
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination hearings, which involved intense scrutiny of his high ... | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-02-27 | N/A | Hope Hicks testifies before the House Intelligence Committee regarding her work for President Trump. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2013-04-29 | N/A | The House Ways & Means Committee held hearings regarding tax reform. | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | President Obama appointed the Review Committee. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | President Obama appoints a Review Committee regarding NSA defenses. | Unknown | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Review Committee determines NSA defenses catastrophically failed. | USA | View |
| 2012-07-31 | N/A | Federal Open Market Committee meeting (Upcoming key date). | US | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Legal case | The Supreme Court ruled in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Supreme Court | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Court case | The ruling in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 162. | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2011-03-10 | N/A | Scheduled release of statement via Press Association and PR Newswire at 11:00 GMT. | London (implied by GMT) | View |
| 2010-03-18 | N/A | Director Nisbet testifies before House Subcommittee hearing on 'Administration of the Freedom of ... | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2009-01-29 | N/A | Water Committee Meeting | Town of Palm Beach (implied) | View |
| 2008-04-23 | N/A | Dissolution of Appellant Euro Brokers Financial Services Limited | N/A | View |
| 2007-04-16 | N/A | Advisory Committee meeting | Unknown | View |
| 1967-01-01 | N/A | House Ways & Means Committee estimated spending increases | USA | View |
| 1945-08-01 | N/A | Committee of 100 places advertisements seeking a congressional candidate to defeat Jerry Voorhis. | California | View |
This document is a labeled 3D rendering/diagram titled 'FLORIDAN PLANT LAYOUT'. It depicts the infrastructure of a water treatment facility, identifying specific components such as storage tanks, a membrane process building, deep injection wells, scrubbers, and chemical storage (including CO2, Fluoride, and Sulfuric Acid). The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016658', indicating it is part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
A memorandum from the Town of Palm Beach Assistant Town Manager to the Water Committee dated January 23, 2009. It outlines documents attached for an upcoming meeting, including water supply options, private well cost estimates, and a statistical analysis of the top 100 water consumers on the island. The document is part of House Oversight materials (Bates 016636).
Minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008. The board voted to postpone a fine reduction hearing to August 21, 2008, and discussed administrative issues including permit ordinances, foreclosure actions, and the enforcement of outstanding fines through the permit system. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein in the text.
This document is a Deutsche Bank presentation slide from approximately 2015 authored by Francis J. Kelly of Global Public Affairs. It analyzes the status of housing reform, noting that legislative efforts are dead according to Senator Bob Corker, while highlighting new programs from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac alongside a chart showing a recovery in existing home sales since 2010. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a slide from a Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs presentation, authored by Francis J. Kelly (page 6, Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026800). It outlines a regulatory relief bill proposed by Senator Richard Shelby intended to benefit small- and mid-sized banks, including raising the 'Systemically Important' asset threshold from $50B to $500B and reforming the Federal Reserve structure. The document includes a strategic note suggesting the bill has potential for success due to Shelby's legislative skill, despite skepticism from observers.
This document outlines changes introduced by the "Tax Act" (likely the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) regarding the taxation of non-US partners and interest expense deductions. It details that gains from selling partnership interests are treated as effectively connected income (ECI) subject to withholding, and establishes a new limitation on business interest deductions capped at 30% of adjusted taxable income.
This document is a program page or partner list for the 2017 Swedish American Life Science Summit (SALSS). It lists corporate partners (including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Embassies) and the leadership team, including Founder Barbro C. Ehnbom. The Senior Advisory Board includes notable figures such as Dr. Robert Langer (MIT) and Dr. William A. Haseltine. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee release (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026750).
This document is a program page for the SALSS (Swedish-American Life Science Summit) 2017. It lists the schedule for the 'HealthTech Showroom', exhibiting partners (such as Elekta and CellInk), and details the 'Rising Star Award' featuring HKH Daniel, Prince of Sweden. It also lists the jury members for the award and various investors attending the 'SALSS Investor Forum'. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document is an invitation for the Swedish-American Life Science Summit (SALSS) 2017 held in Stockholm from August 23rd-25th. It specifically details a 'Gold Sponsor Dinner' hosted by Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (SEB) at Villa Täcka Udden on August 23rd, hosted by Executive Director Viveka Hirdman-Ryrberg. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation.
This court document (Case 1:19-cv-03377) outlines evidence refuting Alan Dershowitz's defenses regarding his interactions with Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts. It cites testimony from Epstein's staff (Alessi, Rodriguez) and other victims (Ransome, Farmer), as well as flight logs and police reports, to demonstrate that Dershowitz did stay at Epstein's home, flew on his plane without his wife, and was present around young females. The text also mentions a written communication from Roberts' lawyer to Dershowitz advising that his travel records were incomplete and that he should have settled the case.
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) analyzing whether the Saudi High Commission (SHC) qualifies as an organ of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is thus entitled to foreign sovereign immunity. The text details arguments regarding SHC's status, funding sources, and structure, citing declarations from Saudi officials and legal precedents like Filler v. Hanvit Bank.
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
This document is page 786 from a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details allegations by plaintiffs that Prince Turki (Head of Saudi Intelligence) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided financial and logistical support to al Qaeda and the Taliban, including facilitating money transfers and supporting charities linked to terrorism. The text also outlines Prince Turki's defense, where he denies these claims, citing his official role in attempting to extradite Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia's severance of ties with the Taliban in 1998. NOTE: While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page deals exclusively with 9/11 litigation and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document contains legal headnotes from a court case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) in relation to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It details court rulings that alleged actions by a Saudi Prince and Saudi Arabia—such as charitable contributions and intelligence decisions—fell under the "discretionary function exception" of the FSIA, thereby barring claims from victims' survivors. It also touches on procedural standards for motions to dismiss regarding personal jurisdiction.
This document details the legislative history shift from pursuing a constitutional amendment for victims' rights to enacting the Crime Victims' Rights Act due to the lack of super-majority support. It outlines the first three specific rights granted to victims under the Act, including protection, notice of proceedings, and the right not to be excluded from court. Footnotes provide citations to legislative records and statements by Senators Kyl and Feinstein.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights (CVRA). It details changes to Rules 1, 5, 12.1, 12.3, and 17 proposed by the Advisory Committee in 2007, specifically focusing on victim representation, protection during detention hearings, and subpoena notifications. The document bears the name of David Schoen, Epstein's attorney, and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of legal materials submitted to Congress regarding the handling of the Epstein case and victims' rights statutes.
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 71 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the Advisory Committee's proposed rules improperly limit the venue for asserting victims' rights to cases where prosecution is already underway, potentially failing to protect victims during the investigation phase (pre-charge) when rights to fairness and dignity might be violated by federal agents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation file, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case and the non-prosecution agreement.
This document is page 69 of 78 from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704) associated with attorney David Schoen. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing 'Rule 60. Victim's Rights,' specifically regarding enforcement, limitations on relief, and the inability to request a new trial based on rights violations. The text includes a discussion section criticizing the Advisory Committee for deviating from the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in ways that reduce victims' rights.
This document is page 66 of 78 from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on the necessity of providing notice to victims regarding court proceedings and the funding allocated to the DOJ for notification systems. The text argues that failure to notify victims of proceedings renders their rights useless and discusses proposed rules for how courts should handle situations where a victim was not notified.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely submitted as evidence by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text provides a legal analysis of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that victims should have the right to be heard by the judiciary when charges are dismissed (Rule 48) and proposing amendments to Rule 50 to ensure victims' rights to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. It critiques the Advisory Committee's resistance to formalizing these rights in the federal rules.
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (pages 945-946) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It analyzes the legal obligations of courts and prosecutors to consider a victim's views when dismissing charges, arguing that victims must be treated with fairness and their views heard. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or evidence regarding the application of the CVRA (likely in relation to Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement).
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article or legal filing, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (likely related to the Epstein case given David Schoen's involvement). It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and argues for a new rule (Rule 44.1) allowing courts discretionary authority to appoint counsel for victims. The text analyzes Judge Kenna's interpretation of the CVRA and cites various legal precedents and statutes supporting the inherent authority of courts to appoint counsel.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 18 and 20 regarding venue transfer and victim notification. It details the Advisory Committee's acceptance of changes to Rule 18 but rejection of changes to Rule 20 based on prosecutorial discretion. The document bears a 'David Schoen' footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to the congressional investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.
This document appears to be page 42 of a 78-page legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically arguing against the broad use of defense subpoenas to obtain victims' private information (such as mental health records). The text cites various legal precedents and Fourth Amendment arguments to support stronger privacy protections for victims in criminal proceedings.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 35 of 78), likely authored or submitted by David Schoen, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17. The text argues against the Advisory Committee's proposed rules for defense subpoenas, claiming they insufficiently protect victims' confidential information and violate the Rules Enabling Act. It cites *United States v. Nixon* to establish the standard for subpoenas (relevancy, admissibility, specificity).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-01-01 | Received | KLC | MIT | $2,500,000.00 | Annual management fee payable in equal quarterl... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity