House
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Deborah Lubov
|
Former employer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rep. Mike Rogers
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deborah Lubov
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Arlan Ettinger
|
President |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00037809.pdf
This document is an email chain between US Marshal Service officials dated shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019. It discusses intelligence gathering, specifically identifying locations of potential financial records (a lifeguard stand named 'Bluebeach' and an office at American Yacht Harbor) and coordinating interviews with witnesses, including Air Traffic Controllers who observed Epstein transporting underage girls. The correspondence also reveals a specific international trip Epstein took to Austria on March 22, 2019, with three females, noting that witnesses had previously been terrified to speak due to a $1 million NDA.
EFTA00032555.pdf
A Department of Justice control sheet tracking correspondence from Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey's Auction House, dated August 13, 2019. Ettinger proposed that his firm handle the disposal of Jeffrey Epstein's estate to maximize financial return and support young women. The document reveals internal DOJ difficulties in assigning the task, as the Criminal Division (CRM), Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and EOUSA initially refused the assignment before it was directed to EOUSA-SDNY by the Office of the Deputy Attorney General.
EFTA00023929.pdf
This document is an email thread between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and attorney Robert C. Josefsberg following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence discusses the scheduling of a court conference by Judge Berman on August 27, 2019, to address the dismissal of the indictment, noting that victims will be allowed to be heard. The emails also facilitate the provision of counseling services and travel assistance for victims through the FBI and SDNY's victim witness coordinator.
EFTA00022980.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, legal counsel for Prince Andrew, in January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While Prince Andrew's lawyers claim he desires to cooperate, they delay the interview to handle 'preliminary issues,' leading to public tension when US Attorney Geoffrey Berman tells the press there has been 'zero co-operation,' provoking an angry rebuttal from Blackfords.
EFTA00017042.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (Southern District of New York) and Gary Bloxsome, the attorney representing Prince Andrew (Duke of York), spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence deteriorates into a dispute over confidentiality after US Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' which Bloxsome argues violates previous assurances of confidentiality and misrepresents the Duke's willingness to cooperate.
DOJ-OGR-00000132.tif
This document discusses the legislative history and intent behind the PROTECT Act's retroactivity provisions, emphasizing that Congress removed an express retroactivity clause due to constitutional concerns. It cites a Supreme Court case (Stogner v. California) and Senator Leahy's statements to argue that the Act applies to past conduct, like Maxwell's, where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00020774.jpg
This legal document argues that the PROTECT Act's statute of limitations applies to Maxwell's past conduct. It counters Maxwell's argument by explaining that Congress removed an express retroactivity provision from the bill due to constitutional concerns raised by figures like Senator Leahy, not to prevent its application to cases where the statute of limitations had not yet expired.
DOJ-OGR-00015760.jpg
A household management document titled 'Shopping List' dated February 14, 2005. It details specific brands of beverages, alcohol (including specific wines and champagne), spices, and canned goods that must be in stock at all times. The document includes a strict instruction that all open packets must be replaced after each visit, regardless of the quantity used.
DOJ-OGR-00021119.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a court opinion or brief, dated February 28, 2023. The author argues against the retroactive application of a statute (§ 3283) by analyzing legislative intent, referencing Senator Leahy's remarks and Congress's rejection of a specific retroactivity provision in a 2003 bill. The argument is supported by comparing the rejected language to similar provisions in other statutes (Pub.L. 107-56 and Pub.L. 101-647) to conclude that applying the statute retroactively fails the legal test established in the Landgraf case.
DOJ-OGR-00002663.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues against the retroactive application of a 2003 Amendment to the alleged offenses of Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that Congressional intent was clear in rejecting retroactivity and that applying the amendment would have impermissible effects. The argument is supported by legal precedents, including Landgraf, Toussie, and Gentile, which favor interpreting criminal statutes of limitation in a way that provides 'repose' for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00005196.jpg
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 12, 2021. The author contends that certain federal statutes, like 18 USC § 3299 and § 3509, intentionally exclude child pornography and exploitation from the definition of sexual abuse, a fact the Justice Department has allegedly always known. The argument is supported by citing 1990 legislative history (VCAA) to claim that Congress intended these laws to apply specifically to federal enclaves.
DOJ-OGR-00023231.jpg
This document page (193) details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) legal interpretation that rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) formally commence upon the filing of a complaint, as that establishes a 'Federal offense.' It also outlines the 2005 Attorney General Guidelines, which assigned the responsibility of identifying and notifying victims during the 'investigation stage' to the FBI Special Agent in Charge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019815.jpg
This document is page 327 from the 'Notes' section of a book, specifically 'How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the filename). It lists bibliographic citations for Chapters 27, 28, and 29, referencing interviews the author conducted with intelligence figures like Michael Hayden and Kucherena, as well as various news articles from 2013–2016 regarding Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the War on Terror. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely due to the author's name or subject matter relevance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019777.jpg
This page discusses the theory that Edward Snowden had an accomplice within the NSA to help him access sealed files. It also explores the mystery of his whereabouts during his first eleven days in Hong Kong, citing speculation by Mike Rogers about potential involvement with China versus U.S. intelligence's inability to track him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019432.jpg
The document discusses the success of educational programs like LEDA and S.E.O. in helping disadvantaged students access top-tier colleges, highlighting the story of Joshua El-Bey. It contrasts these successes with challenges in the public education system and briefly introduces President Obama's plan to overhaul higher education through federal ratings and innovation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031564.jpg
This document contains three repeated blocks of a legal confidentiality disclaimer and copyright notice associated with 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein). It identifies the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com' as the contact point for unauthorized receipt of the communication. The document bears a House Oversight Committee footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026158.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a financial report or income statement containing a table of operating costs, provisions, and profits. It lists metrics such as 'General & Admin. Expenses', 'Provision for loan impairment', and 'Net profit' across six columns of numerical data, likely representing different fiscal periods or entities, though the headers are missing. The document is marked with the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026158', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021980.jpg
This page serves as a section divider for a larger document, specifically introducing 'PART III: The Women'. It contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021980' at the bottom right, indicating it is part of a document production by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020477.jpg
This document appears to be page 18 of a House Oversight Committee report or production, containing endnotes (citations 6-12). The text focuses on US-China relations, specifically Chinese influence operations, lobbying efforts in Washington DC, and foreign travel regulations. While the user identified this as Epstein-related, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their known associates; it strictly lists bibliographic sources regarding Chinese foreign policy and influence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017065.jpg
This document is a page from the participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011, marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation (likely related to Epstein's network). The list includes high-profile individuals alphabetically from David E. Bloom to Scott Brison, featuring notable figures such as Google co-founder Sergey Brin, musician Bono, and Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger. It details their titles, organizations, and countries of origin.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016674.jpg
This document is a House Oversight Committee record containing a spreadsheet of the 'Top 100 Palm Beach Accounts by Average Monthly Consumption' for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. It lists the top 38 accounts visible in this page, detailing customer names, addresses, water consumption (CCF and Gallons), and average monthly bills. Notable high-consumption accounts include The Breakers Hotel (multiple accounts) and Donald J. Trump (Rank #5) at 1100 S Ocean Blvd. While often associated with Epstein-related document dumps due to the Palm Beach location, Jeffrey Epstein's specific name or known address (El Brillo Way) does not appear in the top 38 rows shown in this specific image.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017892.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion concerning the "In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001" litigation, specifically addressing RICO claims against Arab Bank and the SAAR Network. The court dismisses the plaintiffs' claims under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a) for failure to allege injury from investment of racketeering income and discusses the requirements for liability under § 1962(c) and (d), noting that defendants must have some part in directing the enterprise's operation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017200.jpg
This document recounts a controversy at Harvard University involving the Quincy House Film Society's planned screening of the film *Deep Throat*. While initially a campus debate regarding free speech and feminist concerns, the situation escalated when the local District Attorney, John Droney, sought a legal injunction to prevent the showing, prompting the narrator to rush to court to defend the students against prior restraint.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017199.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of Harvard and First Amendment advocacy found in House Oversight docs) discussing historical clashes between civil libertarians and feminists regarding pornography. The narrator details events at Harvard University's Quincy House surrounding the screening of the film 'Deep Throat,' including student votes, administrative responses, violent incidents (shootings/firebombing), and organized protests which the narrator supported despite defending the legal right to show the material.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017197.jpg
This document is a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced in the House Oversight investigation. It details Dershowitz's legal defense of actor Harry Reems regarding the film 'Deep Throat,' noting the eventual dismissal of the case by the Justice Department. It also recounts a separate incident at Harvard involving the Quincy House Film Society showing the same film to raise funds for a screen damaged during a showing of 'Animal House,' which drew protests from female students.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity