New York, NY
LocationRelationship Network
041.pdf
This document is a Motion for Limited Appearance filed on June 4, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert D. Critton, Jr. moves for the admission of Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to appear as co-counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes certificates of service to opposing counsel and a certificate of good standing for Lefkowitz from the District of Columbia court.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
059.pdf
This document is a legal filing from June 3, 2020, submitted by Troutman Sanders LLP to the SDNY Court. It informs Judge Freeman that the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands has officially granted the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.' The attached exhibit is the Order from the USVI court, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell, authorizing the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020, following an agreement with the USVI Attorney General to lift liens to fund the program.
024.pdf
This document is a letter from Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney for the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate, to Judge Lorna G. Schofield, dated January 24, 2020. The letter requests a pre-motion conference to move for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Jane Doe 1000. The defense argues that the plaintiff's claims regarding alleged abuse in 1999 are time-barred by the statutes of limitations in New York and Florida, do not qualify for tolling under the Child Victims Act or criminal proceeding statutes, and that punitive damages cannot be legally awarded against a decedent's estate.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, supporting a motion for 'Jane Doe 1000' to proceed anonymously in her civil suit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleges she was sexually trafficked and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing forced sexual acts and the use of sex toys. The motion argues that anonymity is necessary to protect the plaintiff from severe emotional distress, public scrutiny, and potential retaliation from Maxwell, who was described as being 'at large' at the time of the filing.
006.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously' filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The filing is submitted by attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
002.pdf
Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Jane Doe 1000 against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The suit is categorized under 'Other Personal Injury' and claims diversity jurisdiction, noting Epstein's domicile as the U.S. Virgin Islands. The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
035.pdf
Legal correspondence from Plaintiff's attorney Daniel Mullkoff to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Defendants improperly raised a new argument concerning the New Mexico statute of limitations for the first time in a reply brief and contends that the Plaintiff's claims regarding sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico are timely under the discovery rule.
022-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on February 13, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York by attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago. She is requesting admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate) in the case brought by plaintiff Teala Davies. The affidavit certifies her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
017.pdf
This document is an Amended Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated January 22, 2020, in the civil case of Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein). Judge Gregory H. Woods refers the case to a Magistrate Judge for general pretrial purposes (scheduling, discovery, settlement) and for dispositive motions requiring a Report and Recommendation.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the Estate's executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The filing includes her affidavit and certificates of good standing from the Illinois Bar and the Northern District of Illinois.
010.pdf
A joint letter dated January 10, 2020, from legal counsel representing plaintiffs (victims) and defendants (Epstein Estate executors) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter provides a status update on discovery schedules and settlement discussions, specifically noting the development of a Victims' Compensation Program awaiting approval in the US Virgin Islands. The parties request a court conference in early February 2020.
EFTA00038896.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding security logistics for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. An Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York corresponds with a recipient named Eric to coordinate an 'Approved List' of individuals—including FBI agents and witnesses—permitted to use the '40 Foley Bridge' for access to the courthouse during jury selection and hearings.
EFTA00038611.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain and travel authorization request (EAN) dated March 8, 2021. It details a request by an FBI Special Agent and a Task Force Officer from the New York Field Office to travel to Durango, Colorado, from March 17-19, 2021. The purpose of the trip was to conduct an in-person interview with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in preparation for Maxwell's trial.
EFTA00038546.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email thread from February 2021 regarding an 'Epstein victim' who had 'resurfaced' and requested a trauma-focused therapist. Agents from the New York Field Office (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit) coordinated with agents in another field office (likely Denver/DN) to arrange an interview with the victim and locate appropriate resources. The thread discusses logistics, including finding an FBI office near the victim's location and checking agent availability for the interview.
EFTA00038533.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 2021 between FBI agents in the New York Field Office (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit) and another field office (likely Denver, coded as DN). The correspondence concerns a 'resurfaced' Epstein victim who had previously assisted the FBI and is now requesting a trauma-focused therapist. The agents coordinate to locate an office near her and successfully schedule an interview for the morning of February 24th or 25th, 2021.
EFTA00038524.pdf
This document is an email chain between FBI agents in the New York (NY) and likely Denver (DN) field offices regarding a resurfaced 'Epstein victim.' The victim contacted the FBI asking for a trauma-focused therapist. The agents coordinate a video interview for late February 2021, dealing with logistical delays and the victim having a 'bad day' prior to the scheduled meeting.
EFTA00038416.pdf
This document is an email chain between the FBI New York Office Victim Specialist and the New York State Office of Victim Services (OVS) from January to April 2020. They are coordinating compensation claims for Epstein victims, discussing specific missing information (dates of crimes, county of crime), and troubleshooting logistical issues like faxing documents and working from home during the early COVID-19 pandemic. One claim is noted as 'closed-awarded' with medical bills being processed, while others faced rejection due to missing specific dates of crime, despite the events occurring years prior.
EFTA00038222.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Jennifer Clark (Western Union Financial Intelligence Unit) and a redacted FBI agent (NYO DSAC Coordinator). Clark informs the FBI that Western Union's internal investigation team, triggered by open-source news articles, identified activity with a 'Western Union touch' related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Western Union subsequently filed a regulatory report and sought to proactively share this intelligence with the FBI New York office. The emails discuss the logistics of transferring this encrypted report to the appropriate FBI squad.
EFTA00038188.pdf
This document is an email chain between a Paralegal Specialist from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and an FBI Agent in New York, dated September 20-23, 2019. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a physical drop-off of 'another letter from the public in the Epstein case.' The exchange concludes with a meeting arranged in the lobby on September 23rd for the handover.
EFTA00038051.pdf
This document is an Arrest Warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 2, 2019, for Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19 CRIM 490). The warrant commands law enforcement to arrest Epstein based on an indictment charging him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors under Title 18 of the United States Code. It is signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses.
EFTA00038014.pdf
This document contains an email chain and a formal letter from the FBI Victim Services Division dated September and October 2019, inviting victims of Jeffrey Epstein to informational briefings. The FBI scheduled meetings in Miramar, Florida (Oct 15) and New York City (Oct 23) to discuss victim services, noting that specific details of the active investigation (Case NY-3027571) would not be shared. One redacted victim responded via email confirming their attendance at the Miami location and indicating they would be accompanied by another victim.
EFTA00037932.pdf
An email dated September 20, 2019, from a Paralegal Specialist at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to an FBI employee in New York. The sender is coordinating the drop-off of a physical copy of a letter received from the public regarding the Epstein case. The document includes an attachment reference to '2019.09.06_Epstein_Letter.pdf'.
EFTA00037842.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2019 discussing logistical support for FBI/DOJ interviews with Epstein victims in Los Angeles. A Victim Specialist from the New York Field Office requests assistance for a Case Agent and AUSAs traveling to LA for interviews. The LA office indicates a lack of resources due to staff being occupied with the 'SB Boat accident' (likely the Conception boat fire) and operations in Ventura.
EFTA00037711.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (likely SDNY) and Amazon regarding overdue and incomplete compliance with a Grand Jury Subpoena (Ref. No. CRIM1031692 2019 DS). The prosecutors, including Alison Moe, demand the production of unredacted materials and records for nine specific email addresses, noting that Amazon only provided data for two and redacted over 300 descriptions. The correspondence threatens contempt proceedings if Amazon does not promptly resolve the non-compliance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity