An email correspondence between a Senior Officer Specialist at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and a Lieutenant at the Federal Bureau of Prisons dated July 26, 2019. The email shares a link to a NY Daily News article titled 'ny-epstein-life-behind-bars' regarding Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration.
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2019, between Matt Pieper of CBS News and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Office of Public Affairs. Pieper inquires repeatedly whether Jeffrey Epstein was on suicide watch while in custody. The BOP responds by providing a link to Attorney General William Barr's statement and explicitly declining further comment. Internal BOP text instructs staff to only provide the AG's statement for any follow-up inquiries ('get backs').
Official press release from the U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons announcing the death of inmate Jeffrey Edward Epstein on August 10, 2019. The document states Epstein was found unresponsive in his cell at the MCC New York Special Housing Unit from an apparent suicide and was later pronounced dead at a local hospital. It notes the FBI is investigating and provides background on his arrival at the facility on July 6, 2019, following his indictment for sex trafficking.
This document is a 'Year in Review' email newsletter from Law360 dated December 26, 2019, summarizing major trends, mergers, and judicial confirmations in the legal industry. It includes extensive lists of law firms, companies, and government agencies mentioned in their reporting. The document appears in this collection likely due to the inclusion of the law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' in the list of law firms, which is a keyword match for 'Epstein' but unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein personally.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Jeff Jocks, attorney for Interlochen Center for the Arts, and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY, spanning from February 2020 to October 2021. The correspondence concerns subpoenas issued to Interlochen for student records and tuition payment information related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Jocks confirms that Interlochen only retains tuition records for seven years and that their files contain no record of payments made by Epstein or his entities.
This document is an email dated April 16, 2021, from a Law Clerk for Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to the defense counsel (Cohen Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Sternheim) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v Maxwell (20-cr-330). The email serves to distribute an attached court order which was about to be entered into the public docket. The document marks a procedural step in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a formal legal demand letter dated December 2, 2019, from attorneys Scott A. Srebnick and Jose M. Quinon, representing Michael Avenatti, to the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter requests Brady/Giglio material regarding David Boies and John Stanley Pottinger, citing a New York Times report that they attempted to purchase secret videos filmed by Jeffrey Epstein to extort wealthy men. The defense argues that since Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF) lawyers are witnesses against Avenatti, evidence of their firm chairman's potential criminal conduct is relevant to their credibility and motive to curry favor with the government.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government officials (likely BOP/MDC) regarding her conditions of confinement in June 2021. Sternheim alleges that guards are sleep-depriving Maxwell by waking her at 1 AM and 3 AM when she shivers from cold, and subsequently confiscated her blankets. The correspondence also debates the quality of VTC (video) connections for legal preparation and the behavior of guards, which the defense characterizes as hostile and the prosecution characterizes as enforcing orders.
This document is an email thread from July 6-9, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. An attorney named 'Joe' from the Miami firm Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento contacts an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) because a female client (name redacted) was served with a grand jury subpoena on July 6. The client was previously represented by Joe's deceased partner, Alan Ross. The emails coordinate a phone call between the defense attorney and the prosecutor for the following Tuesday.
This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 3, 2019, summarizing various legal rulings, settlements, and news. It includes a job listing section at the end which features two positions at the law firm 'Epstein Drangel LLP,' which is likely the reason for the document's inclusion in this collection, though it appears unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein. The newsletter covers topics such as a Cravath/NYU ruling, an Ed Sheeran copyright trial, and various financial settlements.
This document is a press release dated June 25, 2020, announcing the launch of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Epstein VCP). The program, designed by experts Kenneth Feinberg, Camille Biros, and Administrator Jordana Feldman, operates independently of the Epstein Estate to provide a voluntary, non-adversarial alternative to litigation for sexual abuse victims. The release outlines the program's independence, confidentiality, and timeline, noting that the protocol was approved by the U.S. Virgin Islands Probate Court.
This document is a Law360 email newsletter dated March 5, 2019, summarizing various legal news stories, including the trial of a former KPMG partner, a suit involving a Trump associate and Mariah Carey's ex-manager, and various law firm hirings and suits. The document appears to be included in the collection due to a 'JOBS' listing on page 4 for the law firm 'Epstein Drangel, LLP', which is an Intellectual Property firm and likely unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein personally. The document contains no flight logs, direct communications with Jeffrey Epstein, or information regarding his criminal network.
An email chain from October 2019 involving Nicolas Bourtin of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Bourtin informs the US Attorney that his client (a bank, likely TD Bank based on the attachment filename) has filed a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) regarding persons associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The bank intends to close these accounts, which hold approximately $30 million, but is checking with the government first to see if they intend to take action (seizure/forfeiture) before the accounts are closed.
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the SDNY, FBI, and NYPD regarding the discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details requests for specific evidence, including 'trash pulls', message pad scans, FBI Sentinel files, CART reports, and search warrant returns from New York, the Virgin Islands, and New Hampshire. The FBI notes they are actively working to segregate and log nude/semi-nude images from the seized digital evidence before production.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and legal counsel for the Interlochen Center for the Arts regarding a subpoena served in February 2020. The AUSA (Maurene) specifically asks Interlochen to confirm if their document production included all records of tuition payments made by Jeffrey Epstein or his entities for any students. The correspondence indicates Interlochen was cooperating and had previously agreed to keep the request confidential.
This document is an email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York to attorneys Gloria and Mariann Wang. The email alerts them to a recent order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing its application to attorneys associated with criminal cases, not just counsel of record.
This document is an email chain between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris. The correspondence spans from July 2020 to December 2020 and concerns the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically addressing her renewed bail application and legal questions regarding the extradition of dual US/French citizens from France.
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 16, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in support of her third motion for bail. The defense proposes a comprehensive bail package including a $28.5 million bond, asset monitoring by a retired federal judge, and renunciation of her British and French citizenships to mitigate flight risk concerns. Attached as Exhibit A is a legal opinion from French attorney William Julié arguing that if Maxwell renounces her French citizenship, she would no longer be protected from extradition by France, countering the French Ministry of Justice's position.
This document contains a thread of internal emails from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) requesting and granting travel approval for prosecutors investigating 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The requests cover the period from March 2019 through November 2019, detailing trips to West Palm Beach, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, specifically for the purpose of 'interviewing victims' and conducting meetings related to the enticement of minors for sexual activity. The emails confirm active investigation efforts continued through late 2019.
Internal US Attorney's Office email chain dated December 21, 2020, discussing a legal challenge in the case U.S. v. Rivera. Judge Engelmayer demanded an explanation from the Bureau of Prisons regarding why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly better accommodations (91 hours/week laptop access vs. 21 hours) than defendant Justin Rivera (at MCC). The email outlines the disparities and prepares for a required declaration due by December 31.
This document is a Deed recorded with the NYC Department of Finance on January 10, 2012, transferring ownership of the property at 9 East 71st Street, Manhattan, from 'Nine East 71st Street Corporation' to 'Maple, Inc.' The transfer occurred on December 23, 2011, for nominal consideration ($10). Jeffrey E. Epstein signed as President of the selling corporation. The signing took place in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, and was notarized by Erika Kellerhals, who shares a business address with the buying entity, Maple, Inc.
This document is an email chain from December 3-6, 2018, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and an NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding a 'New Investigation' (likely the reopened Epstein case). The emails discuss the logistics of setting up a meeting, the fact that agents were 'just assigned' the case on December 3rd, and the transfer of digital evidence (CDs/drives). The thread culminates in a meeting on December 6, 2018, and the digital transmission of a 'clear report'.
An email chain from November 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns finding legal work product or precedents arguing that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is not considered part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes. The emails reference the 'MCC guard case' (likely the prosecution of Epstein guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas) and attach a 2020 opposition brief related to a motion to compel by 'Thomas'.
An internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the opening of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in November 2021. The primary email, sent to criminal prosecutors and investigators, rallies the team, contrasts the SDNY's resolve with Florida prosecutors (referencing the earlier Epstein case), and provides logistical details for attending the opening statements at the courthouse. Colleagues respond with support and commitment to the 'battle' for truth.
An email chain from November 28, 2021, among staff at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the opening of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The primary email from an Assistant US Attorney provides logistical details for the trial (courtroom locations, start time) and includes a strong statement contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical sex crimes with prosecutors in Florida. Colleagues reply with support, praising the prosecutor as an advocate for the victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity