New York, NY
LocationRelationship Network
021.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 6, 2023, in the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation (Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR) in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Audra J. Soloway of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP notifies the court that she is representing defendant Phebe N. Novakovic. The footer indicates the firm also represents several other defendants including Stephen B. Burke, Todd A. Combs, James S. Crown, Timothy P. Flynn, Mellody Hobson, and John W. Kessler.
020.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 6, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the JPMorgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation (Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jessica S. Carey of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is formally entering her appearance as counsel for defendant Phebe N. Novakovic. The document also lists Carey as counsel for several other defendants including Stephen B. Burke, Todd A. Combs, James S. Crown, Timothy P. Flynn, Mellody Hobson, and John W. Kessler.
019.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 30, 2023, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP seeks permission to represent defendant James Edward Staley in the case 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon et al.', which names numerous JPMorgan Chase executives and board members as defendants.
019-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on June 30, 2023, by John McNichols, a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, supporting his motion to appear pro hac vice in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. The case involves JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and lists numerous individual defendants including James Dimon and James E. Staley. McNichols attests to his good standing with the bars of Maryland, Virginia, and D.C., and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
015.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jacobus J. Schutte from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP enters his appearance as counsel for a specific group of eighteen defendants, including Linda B. Bammann and James A. Bell, in a lawsuit involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its executives/board members (including James Dimon and James E. Staley). The plaintiff is the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund.
014.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Jessica S. Carey of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is entering her appearance as counsel of record for a large group of individual defendants—primarily board members and executives—in a lawsuit brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. (nominal defendant) and its leadership.
013.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on June 22, 2023, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 23-cv-03903-JSR). Attorney Audra J. Soloway of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP formally enters her appearance as counsel for a specific group of defendants, including Linda B. Bammann, James A. Bell, and others, in a lawsuit filed by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. directors and officers. The case appears to be a shareholder derivative suit involving JPMC leadership, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
008.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry v. James Dimon, et al. (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR). Judge Jed S. Rakoff granted the motion for attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. to appear *pro hac vice* as counsel for the plaintiff. The lawsuit names numerous JPMorgan executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, as defendants.
007.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 9, 2023, granting Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. admission pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund. The lawsuit names JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and numerous individual defendants, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.
005.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeks permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its executives/board members (including James Dimon and James E. Staley). The motion confirms Mackintosh's good standing with the bars of Pennsylvania and Delaware.
20250509132036202_24-1073%20Affidavit.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. Rina Danielson certifies that on May 9, 2025, she served the 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' to attorneys for both Maxwell (David Oscar Markus) and the United States (Solicitor General D. John Sauer). The service was performed via Priority Mail and email, with physical copies also sent to the Court via Federal Express.
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
2022.03.17%20%20Notice%20-%20Notice%20to%20the%20Court.pdf
This document is an opposition brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands against the Epstein Estate's request for over $112,000 in attorneys' fees. The Government argues that the Estate is not a 'prevailing party' because the underlying court orders were not final judgments, and that the requested hourly rates (up to $1,315/hr) are excessive compared to the local standard of $350/hr. The filing also references the Government's broader CICO lawsuit alleging Epstein used his VI businesses to transport and abuse victims on Little St. James Island.
042.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated May 11, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley (representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter requests a court conference to address the Defendants' (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein estate) alleged failure to participate in discovery, specifically their refusal to produce documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy and to answer interrogatories regarding email accounts used by Epstein. McCawley argues that the Defendants are engaging in obstructionist delay tactics.
037.pdf
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.
028.pdf
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed on March 20, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. John Murphy of Troutman Sanders LLP attests that he served the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and supporting memorandum to attorneys David Boies II, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Joshua Schiller of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on February 24, 2020.
017.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated February 24, 2020, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate). The order grants attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to represent the defendants.
015.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 14, 2020, in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Molly S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Co-Executors of Epstein's estate), in the Southern District of New York. The attorney attests to her good standing in Illinois and lack of disciplinary history.
038.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 5, 2017, and filed on June 6, 2017. Judge Robert W. Sweet orders the termination of the case (17 Mc. 25) between Bradley J. Edwards and Ghislaine Maxwell following the resolution of a motion to quash a subpoena via a sealed opinion dated April 4, 2017.
036.pdf
A legal filing (Sur-Reply) by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys arguing that Plaintiff Bradley Edwards must produce solicitation letters sent to former Epstein employees and their responses. The defense argues Edwards waived work-product privilege by failing to produce a privilege log and that the letters sent to third parties do not constitute work product.
034.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 14, 2017, by attorney Paul G. Cassell to Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell. Cassell requests a one-week continuance for a hearing regarding a Motion to Quash a subpoena served on his client, Bradley J. Edwards, citing a scheduled medical procedure preventing him from traveling to New York. The opposing counsel is noted as having agreed to reschedule the hearing to March 23, 2017.
031.pdf
A court order filed on March 3, 2017, by Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document sets a schedule for hearing various motions throughout March 2017 and establishes a deadline for objections to deposition designations in April 2017. It also references a related motion to quash in the case of Bradley v. Maxwell.
030.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman updating the court on the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It attaches a Status Report filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and the detailed Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which outlines eligibility, claims administration, evaluation methodology, and compensation procedures for sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
018-01.pdf
This document is an Affidavit filed on February 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Mary "Molly" S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP submits this sworn statement to support her motion for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) in a civil suit brought by Anastasia Doe. The affidavit confirms her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
001-02.pdf
This document is a summons and affidavit of service related to a lawsuit filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida. Jane Doe, represented by her mother, is the plaintiff against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The document details the service of the summons on Sarah Kellen in New York City on April 19, 2008, and includes important legal notices in English, Spanish, and French regarding the lawsuit and the defendant's responsibilities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity