Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court proceeding Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. United States Courthouse at... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing hearing The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Proposed meeting Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal case Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal proceeding A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. United States District Cour... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, 4... View
N/A Legal proceeding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... United States District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... United States District Cour... View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-22 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-08-10 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal judgment A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 N/A Imposition of Judgment N/A View

007.pdf

This document is a letter motion dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests approval for an agreement where the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) accept service of a complaint by Anastasia Doe and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond. The document includes a handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement by Judge Nathan dated January 8, 2020.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

006.pdf

Legal correspondence dated January 7, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests court approval for an agreement wherein the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate accept service of a complaint by 'Anastasia Doe' and receive an extension until February 17, 2020, to respond.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

EFTA00038962.pdf

This document is an email forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. On April 29, 2022, Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an Opinion & Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and confirming her conviction on Counts Three, Four, and Six, while dismissing other counts as multiplicitous. The order explicitly mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a co-conspirator in a scheme to abuse underage girls and confirms Maxwell's sentencing date for June 28, 2022.

Email / court notice (notice of electronic filing)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00038903.pdf

This document is a calendar entry and email notification containing the text of a court order filed on January 14, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, schedules Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and outlines deadlines for joint letters regarding the Speedy Trial Act and severed perjury counts.

Calendar entry / court docket notification
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00038902.pdf

This document is an email notification of a court filing (Document 577) in the case USA v. Maxwell, dated January 14, 2022. It contains the text of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and deferring proceedings on severed perjury counts. It also sets a deadline of January 18, 2022, for a joint letter regarding Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.

Court notification / email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00032797.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell case. It discusses a filing by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and a subsequent endorsement by Judge Nathan regarding the delay of legal mail for Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as GM). The judge expressed a 'firm expectation' that the defendant receive legal mail within one business day.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00032789.pdf

This document is an email dated April 16, 2021, from a Law Clerk for Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to the defense counsel (Cohen Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Sternheim) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v Maxwell (20-cr-330). The email serves to distribute an attached court order which was about to be entered into the public docket. The document marks a procedural step in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00032766.pdf

This document is an Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 20, 2021. The Judge denies Maxwell's request for a renewed bail hearing, ruling that the new S2 Superseding Indictment (which adds charges regarding a Minor Victim-4 between 2001-2004) only strengthens the Government's case regarding flight risk. The Judge also orders defense counsel to clarify their request for a trial adjournment, specifically asking for a precise duration (90 days vs. January 2022) by April 22, 2021, noting that the severance of perjury counts may shorten the necessary trial preparation.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00032667.pdf

This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 16, 2021. The order addresses the sealing and redaction of twelve reply briefs filed by the Defendant; it mandates the immediate filing of unredacted briefs 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12, and sets a deadline of April 20, 2021, for justifications regarding redactions in the remaining briefs. The Judge emphasizes that a protective order alone is insufficient to justify sealing judicial documents.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031690.pdf

This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, forwarding a 'Notice of Electronic Filing' from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The notice contains the text of an order by Judge J. Nathan granting a continuance of the trial until Fall 2021 to allow the defense time to prepare for additional charges in the S2 indictment. The order mandates that the parties meet and confer by May 10, 2021, to propose a specific trial start date.

Court notice / email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031685.pdf

Court Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 3, 2021, addressing an incident on April 24, 2021, at the MDC where Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were accused of violating BOP rules during a visit. The Judge denied the defense's request for the Court to order the turnover of video tapes (though they must be preserved) and ordered Government counsel to confer with MDC to ensure Maxwell maintains access to confidential attorney-client communications.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031684.pdf

A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated May 3, 2021. The order addresses a letter received from a non-party's counsel requesting anonymity for their client, an alleged victim of a sexual crime. The Judge orders the letter to be filed under seal to protect the individual's privacy interests.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031609.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to attorney Mark Manley regarding his client's anonymity in the *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* case. The government states they do not intend to call the client as a witness but cannot guarantee the client's name will not appear in public trial exhibits or testimony. The letter notably asserts that UK privacy laws do not apply in this jurisdiction and clarifies that the client is not considered a victim of child sexual exploitation in this specific case.

Legal correspondence (letter from us attorney)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031606.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated April 29, 2021, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses an incident on April 24, 2021, where MDC staff seized Maxwell's legal materials. Judge Nathan orders the MDC legal counsel to provide an inventory of seized items to the defense and to file a representation with the Court regarding potential duplication of materials and steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of attorney-client communications.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031488.pdf

This document is an email chain containing a press release from the United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York, dated July 2, 2020, announcing the arrest and charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is charged with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors, facilitating abuse, and perjury in connection with 2016 depositions. The press release details Maxwell's alleged role in grooming and abusing minors alongside Epstein in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.

Email chain with press release/statement
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031439.pdf

This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials, specifically an additional photograph and a cover letter, which are being prepared on a drive for the client (Ghislaine Maxwell) to review at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).

Legal correspondence / email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031428.pdf

This document is an email thread from April 2021 between Defense Counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers (specifically Law Clerk Juan Ruiz Toro). The correspondence concerns a request by the defense to bring electronic devices into the courthouse via the Worth Street entrance for 'evidence views'. The final email confirms that Judge Nathan has signed an order granting permission.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031254.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of New York signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on November 28, 2021. The order grants permission for redacted attorneys to bring HP laptops into Courtroom 318 for the trial of United States vs. Ghislaine Maxwell between November 29, 2021, and January 15, 2022.

Court order (application to bring personal electronic devices)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030910.pdf

Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 3, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court approves the defendant's proposed redactions for letters dated November 25 and 30 regarding a renewed bail motion, citing the privacy interests of individuals mentioned in the letters. The court denies the request for an in camera conference but allows written submissions with tailored redactions and orders the parties to schedule briefing for the renewed bail motion.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030904.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Jeffrey Pagliuca, denying a request to use criminal discovery materials in a separate civil lawsuit. The Government cites a Protective Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan which restricts the use of such materials solely to the defense of the criminal case to protect an ongoing investigation. The letter suggests counsel use FOIA or Touhy requests if seeking records for civil litigation purposes.

Legal correspondence / letter from doj
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030757.pdf

This document contains an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The NEF details a court order by Judge J. Nathan dated December 8, 2020, which denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify about her confinement conditions. However, the order mandates that the Government submit written updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials and ability to communicate with counsel.

Court notice / email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030686.pdf

This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The filing is a Court Order dated December 8, 2020, in which Judge Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify regarding her conditions of confinement. The order mandates that the Government provide written updates on Maxwell's conditions, specifically regarding legal access, every 60 days.

Court notice / email (notice of electronic filing)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030015.pdf

Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim writes to Judge Alison Nathan objecting to a second superseding indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell just months before the scheduled July 2021 trial. The defense argues this expansion of charges (covering 1994-2004) constitutes tactical gamesmanship and abuse of power, potentially necessitating a delay in the trial. The letter also requests an in-person arraignment and a new bail hearing, citing issues with remote proceedings and referencing Maxwell's difficult detention conditions.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029971.pdf

Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to be released into the general prison population. The court ruled the request for victim identities was premature as discovery had just begun, and found that the Bureau of Prisons was already providing sufficient access to legal materials (13 hours a day). The court ordered the Government to provide status updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions every 90 days.

Memorandum opinion and order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029844.pdf

Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.

Legal correspondence / motion response
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search