Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court proceeding Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. United States Courthouse at... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing hearing The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Proposed meeting Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal case Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal proceeding A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. United States District Cour... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, 4... View
N/A Legal proceeding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... United States District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... United States District Cour... View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-22 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-08-10 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal judgment A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 N/A Imposition of Judgment N/A View

EFTA00029590.pdf

Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Nathan objecting to the government's recent attempts to avoid disclosing the identities of unnamed co-conspirators and specific co-conspirator statements intended for trial. The defense characterizes the government's position as an improper 'motion to reconsider' prior court orders without showing extraordinary circumstances. The letter requests the Court confirm its orders requiring disclosure by October 11, 2021, to allow the defense to prepare motions in limine regarding the admissibility of statements from Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed employee.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029540.pdf

This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.

Court order / opinion & order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029535.pdf

This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.

Email thread and court notice of electronic filing (nef)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029354.pdf

This document is a Court Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify the frequency of flashlight safety checks during the night at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The defense argued the checks occurred every 15 minutes and disrupted sleep, while the Government maintained the checks were necessary for safety due to Maxwell being housed alone and the high-profile nature of the case. The Court ruled the request unsubstantiated but urged the MDC to consider ways to reduce sleep disruption for pre-trial detainees.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029241.pdf

A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 8, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter requests permission for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media equipment (VCR, cassette players, etc.) into the courthouse for an evidence view scheduled for mid-April 2021.

Legal correspondence / motion
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028706.pdf

A court order filed on June 2, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a detailed schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including deadlines for victim identification, witness lists, Jencks Act materials, and motions in limine, spanning from September to November 2021.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028584.pdf

This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.

Email correspondence / legal filing cover letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028277.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The correspondence involves Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers distributing a court order to counsel and subsequent discussion among counsel regarding the docketing of motions in limine and filing an opening brief.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028265.pdf

A joint letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the Government and Defense positions on protecting witness identities, including the use of pseudonyms (nomenclature), voir dire procedures, jury instructions, and the handling of sealed exhibits to prevent public disclosure of victim identities. The document contains significant redactions regarding the actual names and pseudonyms of the witnesses.

Legal letter / joint letter to court
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028260.pdf

A joint letter submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan by the U.S. Attorney's Office and Defense Counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines agreed-upon procedures and disagreements regarding the protection of witness identities during the upcoming trial, including the use of pseudonyms, voir dire protocols to screen jurors, specific jury instructions, and the use of physical binders for sealed exhibits to prevent public viewing. It includes a heavily redacted chart meant to map true witness names to their trial pseudonyms.

Legal correspondence (joint letter to court)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028165.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated November 3, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a hearing for November 10, 2021, to address motions regarding Federal Rules of Evidence 412 and 702 (Daubert). The order also sets briefing deadlines for issues concerning anticipated witness testimony and instructions for docketing redacted exhibits.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028103.pdf

A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.

Legal correspondence (touhy request)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028055.pdf

Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in US v. Maxwell denying the defendant's request to broadly modify a protective order to use criminal discovery documents in civil cases. The Court found Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the modification. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to share specific factual information regarding grand jury subpoenas and prior rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') with relevant judicial officers under seal, as these facts were largely public record.

Memorandum opinion and order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027753.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the delivery of legal mail to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government explains the MDC's mail processing protocols and attributes a specific delay in delivering a hard drive to an 'institutional emergency' on October 13, 2021. Judge Nathan appends an order to the end of the document, denying the defense's request for a specific delivery order but stating a firm expectation that legal mail be delivered within one business day.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027704.pdf

A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 18, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests permission to file motions *in limine* with redactions designed to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, specifically requesting the sealing of 'Section X' until the conclusion of the trial. The specific Assistant US Attorney signing the document has their name redacted.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027661.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 11, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan approves the parties' proposed redactions and sealing requests to protect the privacy of victims and witnesses, ordering the redacted documents to be filed by November 12, 2021.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027654.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a conference for November 10, 2021, to address defense motions concerning Federal Rules of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and 702 (expert testimony). The order explicitly mandates the parties to confirm by November 9 that alleged victims have been notified of the upcoming hearing and their right to attend.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027653.pdf

An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.

Email (legal correspondence)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027649.pdf

Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on November 8, 2021, in the case of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a conference for November 10 to address evidentiary motions (Rule 412 and Rule 702) and mandates that parties confirm by November 9 that alleged victims referenced in the Rule 412 motion have been notified of the hearing and their right to attend.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027648.pdf

An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.

Email correspondence / legal document
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027456.pdf

This document is an email dated April 23, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger. The email serves to transmit a sealed order attached as a PDF regarding the case '20-cr-330, US v Ghislaine Maxwell'. The document indicates legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell were ongoing in 2021 under Judge Nathan.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027416.pdf

This document is a Court Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 3, 2021. The order grants the Defendant's request for the Government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment whom the Government intends to refer to at trial, rejecting the Government's objection as untimely and unpersuasive. The Court also sets a deadline of October 11 for the disclosure of all co-conspirator statements the Government intends to offer at trial.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027169.pdf

Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Alison Nathan arguing against the government's request to defer ruling on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence until after the trial on non-perjury counts. The defense contends that an evidentiary hearing is necessary immediately because the government's alleged misconduct (misleading a judge to obtain a subpoena) constitutes a due process violation that could suppress all 90,000 pages of evidence and any derivatives ('fruit of the poisonous tree'). Furthermore, the defense argues that Maxwell cannot knowingly decide whether to testify without knowing the admissibility of this evidence, as the government has only promised not to use it in its case-in-chief but reserved rights for impeachment.

Legal correspondence / motion response
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027163.pdf

This is a court order dated April 21, 2021, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a joint letter from the Defendant and law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) regarding proposed redactions to filings concerning a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The court orders the parties to confer by April 22 and sets a deadline of April 23 for the Government to justify any redaction requests or for the letter to be filed publicly.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027159.pdf

A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). The order states that the trial for severed perjury counts will be scheduled after the non-perjury trial is completed and defers resolution on pending motions to suppress until that time. A deadline for objections is set for April 22, 2021.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search