Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court proceeding Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. United States Courthouse at... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing hearing The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Proposed meeting Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal case Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal proceeding A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. United States District Cour... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, 4... View
N/A Legal proceeding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... United States District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... United States District Cour... View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-22 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-08-10 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal judgment A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 N/A Imposition of Judgment N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00002254.jpg

This document is the final page (page 22) of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail (Dkt. No. 97). The document cites United States v. Raniere as legal precedent regarding the evaluation of the motion.

Court order / legal ruling
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002254(1).jpg

This document is the final page of a court order dated December 28, 2020, and filed on December 30, 2020. United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the renewed motion for release on bail for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002250.jpg

This document is page 18 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's rejection of bail arguments, stating that the Defendant's significant wealth and assets (including $4 million in a hedge fund) would allow her to flee and compensate any bond supporters for their losses. It further outlines strict proposed release conditions, including home confinement, GPS monitoring, and security guards, which the Court ultimately finds insufficient to mitigate flight risk.

Court filing (order/opinion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg

This is page 4 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text discusses the legal standards for reopening a bail hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), citing precedents that a hearing should only be reopened if new information exists that was not known at the time of the original hearing. It introduces the discussion of the Defendant's renewed motion for bail.

Court filing (legal memorandum/order)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002233.jpg

This document is the first page of an Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York. It outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The order addresses and seemingly denies a renewed motion for bail, reinforcing the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk.

Court opinion and order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002233(1).jpg

This document is an Opinion and Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan addresses the defendant's renewed motion for release on bail pending trial, ultimately indicating that the new information solidifies the Court's view that the defendant remains a flight risk.

Court opinion and order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002232.jpg

A legal letter dated December 30, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter confirms that neither the prosecution nor the defense proposes any redactions to the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002232(1).jpg

This document is a letter filed on December 30, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors inform the court that, after conferring with the defense, both parties agree that no redactions are necessary for the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. Consequently, they have no objection to the order being filed publicly in its entirety.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002231.jpg

This document is page 2 of a court order filed on December 28, 2020, by U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge denies the Defendant's application for release, reaffirming that she poses a flight risk and that no bail conditions can reasonably assure her appearance. The parties are ordered to submit a joint letter regarding redactions by December 30, 2020.

Court order / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002231(1).jpg

This court order, dated December 28, 2020, and signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, denies the Defendant's application for release from custody. The Court reaffirms its initial decision, concluding that the Defendant is a flight risk and that pre-trial detention is warranted. The parties are ordered to submit a joint letter by December 30, 2020, regarding any proposed redactions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002206.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter informs the court of the submission of two versions of a reply memorandum concerning their client Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. One version is unredacted and filed under seal, while the other is redacted for public viewing, citing privacy concerns and confidential financial information as reasons for the redactions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002206(1).jpg

This is a legal letter dated December 18, 2020, from attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, representing their client Ghislaine Maxwell, are requesting to file documents related to her motion for bail under seal. They seek to submit an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for the public, citing privacy concerns and the need to protect confidential information, including financial documents, as governed by a protective order.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002205.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 23, 2020. The order directs the defendant to file redacted documents and exhibits by the end of that day, citing legal precedents that balance the presumption of public access with the need to protect third-party privacy interests.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002205(1).jpg

This is page 2 of a court order filed on December 23, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the defendant to docket redacted documents related to a renewed motion for bail by the same day, citing case law that supports redactions to protect third-party privacy interests.

Court order / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002204.jpg

This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 23, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants the Defendant's request to file certain materials related to her bail application with redactions, as the Government did not oppose them. The Court found that the proposed redactions satisfy the legal test for balancing the public's right to access against privacy interests and judicial efficiency.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002204(1).jpg

A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order approves Maxwell's request to redact portions of her reply to the Government's opposition regarding her renewed bail application, citing legal standards for privacy and judicial efficiency.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002198.jpg

This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.

Legal correspondence / victim statement
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002198(1).jpg

This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan, which includes a statement from Annie Farmer. Farmer, identifying herself as a victim, vehemently opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, characterizing Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who has lived a parasitic lifestyle. The statement argues that releasing Maxwell would prevent justice for her and other victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002170(1).jpg

This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's reasoning for detaining the defendant pending trial, citing flight risk, the insufficiency of home security/electronic monitoring, and rejecting arguments regarding COVID-19 risks. It also outlines the 'Applicable Law' under the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq.) regarding the standards for pretrial detention.

Legal filing (court order/opinion excerpt)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg

This is the second page of a court order (Document 99) filed on December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the Government to docket redacted documents and exhibits by that same day, ruling that the redactions are narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The document cites legal precedents regarding the presumption of access to judicial documents.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002156.jpg

This document is a character reference letter dated December 7, 2020, written by an anonymous individual to Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The author, who claims a long-standing personal relationship with Maxwell, provides a positive portrayal of her character, citing her as an inspiration who taught them about generosity and resilience. The letter explicitly requests that the judge consider granting bail to Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002154.jpg

This is a certification page from a legal document filed on December 14, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The document, signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, attests that Ghislaine Maxwell appeared in person during December 2020 to swear an oath confirming the truthfulness of statements made in the associated filing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002060.jpg

This document is a character reference letter dated December 1, 2020, written to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The author, whose name is redacted, claims to have been a friend of Maxwell's for over 25 years and describes her as loyal and kind, citing a personal example where Maxwell provided them with free housing during a difficult time. The letter concludes by asserting Maxwell's right to the presumption of innocence and due process.

Letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002058.jpg

This document is a confidential letter dated November 17, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, advocating for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The anonymous author attests to Maxwell's good character, offers a $2,000 bond, and describes a long-standing relationship with Maxwell and her family, arguing against flight risk and highlighting severe confinement conditions.

Confidential letter in support of bail
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002053.jpg

This is a character reference letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 28, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail request. The anonymous author, a family friend since age 15, describes the Maxwell family dynamic, characterizing Robert Maxwell as narcissistic and controlling while praising Ghislaine's work ethic, intelligence, and caring nature. The letter details the author's long-term relationships with various Maxwell siblings and the mother, Betty Maxwell, noting the author wrote a book for Betty prior to her death in 2013.

Legal filing / character reference letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search