Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-28 N/A Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell District Court View
2022-06-28 Legal proceeding Sentencing UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-28 N/A Date of sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-28 Sentencing Scheduled date for sentencing. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-28 Sentencing Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-28 Sentencing The scheduled sentencing for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, S... View
2022-06-28 Sentencing The Court scheduled the sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell for June 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-28 Sentencing Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-28 Sentencing Sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell before Judge Alison J. Nathan. SDNY Court View
2022-06-28 Legal proceeding A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... United States District Court View
2022-06-28 Sentencing hearing Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case USA v. Maxwell. United States District Court View
2022-06-28 N/A Date of Sentence SDNY View
2022-06-27 Court filing A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-26 Court order The Court issued an Order to which the Government's letter is a response. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-26 Legal filing The court order (Document 684) was filed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-25 Court action The Court contacted the Warden for MDC regarding the Defendant's access to legal materials. N/A View
2022-06-25 N/A Order filed and signed by Judge Nathan New York, New York View
2022-06-24 N/A Filing of Court Order S.D.N.Y. View
2022-06-24 Legal filing Filing of court order regarding victim statements at sentencing. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-24 Legal filing Filing of Document 682 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. New York, New York View
2022-06-24 Court order The Court denied the Defendant's request for redactions. N/A View
2022-06-22 N/A Letter submitted regarding Victim Impact Statement New York, NY View
2022-06-21 N/A Order signed and filed New York, New York View
2022-06-21 Legal filing The court order (Document 665) was filed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004893.jpg

This document is a cover letter filed on July 2, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It accompanies the filing of unsealed Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress, in compliance with a court order dated July 1, 2021. The document bears the case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and a DOJ bates stamp.

Legal correspondence / court filing cover letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004811.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's indictment should be dismissed by citing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision to vacate Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise. The defense asserts that the government is similarly reneging on a formal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Maxwell from over 25 years prior, violating fundamental fairness and due process.

Legal filing (defense letter/motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004810.jpg

This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.

Legal letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004809.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 1, 2021, is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The government requests that the Court issue an order compelling Mr. Markus (presumably defense counsel) to comply with Local Rule 23.1 regarding trial publicity. The letter argues that an Op-Ed published by Mr. Markus and his continued comments violate a previous court order and are likely to interfere with the Court's ability to conduct a fair trial with an impartial jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004808.jpg

This legal document, filed by the Government on July 1, 2021, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that statements made to the media by defense appellate counsel, Mr. Markus, violate Local Rule 23.1. The filing specifically cites a recent Op-Ed where Markus compared his client's case to Bill Cosby's, arguing these extrajudicial comments are designed to prejudice potential jurors and interfere with a fair trial. The Government asserts that relief is warranted to prevent further prejudicial statements.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004806.jpg

This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on July 1, 2021. The order lifts the temporary seal on a previous opinion regarding Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence. It also unseals a memorandum decision, an order, and hearing transcripts from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, and orders Maxwell to file these documents on the public docket without redaction by July 2, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004785.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order filed on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the law firm that represented Virginia Giuffre in a 2015 civil defamation suit against Maxwell. The document outlines the background of the civil suit, noting that Giuffre alleged defamation regarding accusations of sexual abuse by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Court opinion & order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004784.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004782.jpg

This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the defendant's request that the Government is only required to file updates if there are material changes to Maxwell's conditions of confinement. The court noted it would take no further action absent other specific applications for relief.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004781.jpg

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court order filed on June 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The order was signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan in New York, New York. The document contains a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00004781.

Court order (signature page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004780.jpg

This is a court order issued on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and further orders the unsealing of documents from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, including a memorandum and transcripts from hearings in March and April 2019. The parties are given a short timeframe to confer and propose redactions to these documents before they are made public.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004777.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated June 7, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter provides an update on the confinement conditions for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), stating that she receives more time and resources for discovery review than any other inmate. Specifically, it details her 13-hour daily access to computers, her ability to communicate with attorneys, and her extended time outside her cell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004776.jpg

This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 16, 2021. The order approves redactions proposed by Maxwell regarding a Government update on her confinement conditions and orders the Government to publicly file the redacted version by June 17, 2021.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004744.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 300 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 32 LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM 212-243-1100 • Main 917-306-6666 • Cell 888-587-...

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004742.jpg

This document is the final page of a court order (Document 298) for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 4, 2021. The order was issued in New York, New York, and is signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document also contains a unique identifier, DOJ-OGR-00004742, at the bottom.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004737.jpg

This document is a Court Order filed on June 4, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for specific items, including a victim's teenage diary, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The judge notes that while the victim's diary describes visiting Epstein in New York, there is no indication Maxwell is mentioned in the journal.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004736.jpg

This is a court order from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 2, 2021. The order establishes a schedule for legal proceedings, setting a November 8, 2021 deadline for defense disclosures and noting proposals from both the Government and the Defendant regarding the close of the Government's case-in-chief. It also affirms the parties' ongoing obligation to update disclosures and allows for raising late issues under specific circumstances.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004735.jpg

This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 2, 2021, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order establishes a detailed disclosure and filing schedule for the prosecution and defense, setting deadlines from September to November 2021 for key pre-trial activities such as disclosing victim identities, witness lists, expert reports, and filing various motions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004734.jpg

A legal letter dated May 28, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing an Omnibus Reply Memorandum under seal because it contains confidential discovery information governed by a protective order, allowing the government time to propose redactions before public filing.

Legal correspondence / letter to the court
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014717.jpg

This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.

Court transcript cover page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014679.jpg

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 22, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, details the legal teams for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), and notes the presence of FBI agent Amanda Young and NYPD officer Paul Byrne. The document was filed on August 10, 2022, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00014679.

Court transcript cover page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014659.jpg

Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

Court transcript (cover page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002925.jpg

This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002842.jpg

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search