| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Adversarial negotiating |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional opposing counsel |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafana
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor defense counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Meeting participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Oosterbaan
|
Opposing counsel negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion and agreement on the addendum's terms after a draft was sent and a phone call occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations regarding Mr. Epstein's plea agreement, lasting seven weeks, described as 'spinning ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña sent a revised plea agreement to Lefkowitz and advised him about the controlling NPA if... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sought to speak to Acosta regarding negotiations. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña sent revised Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to Lefkowitz. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The defense team rejected Acosta's December 19, 2007, NPA modification letter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz responded to Acosta's NPA proposal, raising 'troubling questions' and noting the incong... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA Negotiation | West Palm Beach/Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta, expressing USAO's concern about Epstein intentionall... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentence Reduction | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a revised draft NPA | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting process of the NPA and federal plea agreement | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal dispute | Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Negotiations over a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein, involving arguments, proposals, ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator worked at Kirkland & Ellis. | Kirkland & Ellis | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) negotiations between Villafaña and Lefkowitz regarding Jeffrey Ep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz to discuss the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement negotiation | Discussions and communications regarding the terms of a plea agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, invol... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz where Lefkowitz claimed Acosta made several conc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea deal negotiation regarding sentence length (18-month vs 20-month) and jurisdiction (state vs... | USAO | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Lefkowitz sent Villafaña a revised draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) proposing an 18-month se... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-16 | Legal drafting | Lefkowitz added a confidentiality clause to a new version of the NPA for the first time. | N/A | View |
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 208-209), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight report. It details the aggressive legal strategy employed by Jeffrey Epstein's 'army' of high-profile attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) against the prosecution, including investigating prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. The text confirms that despite these efforts, Epstein pled guilty on June 30, 2008, to state charges requiring 18 months imprisonment and sex offender registration.
This document page outlines the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in 2005 regarding the abuse of minors. It specifically details allegations of witness tampering, citing a 2007 incident where Epstein instructed his personal assistant, Leslie Groff, not to cooperate with FBI agents serving a subpoena at her home. The document also briefly mentions Donald Trump and Bill Clinton in the context of phone listings in an evidentiary journal.
An email dated November 29, 2018, sent by 'David' to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' sharing an AOL article about a Trump aide helping a sex abuser secure a plea deal. David comments on the media angle, discusses the recipient's legal representation (specifically mentioning Dershowitz and Lefkowitz), and disputes the article's claim that victims were silenced. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email dated November 29, 2018, sent by 'David' to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' sharing an AOL article about a Trump aide helping a sex abuser secure a plea deal. David comments on the media angle, discusses the recipient's legal representation (specifically mentioning Dershowitz and Lefkowitz), and disputes the article's claim that victims were silenced. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document page, likely from a House Oversight Committee report, features a photograph of a woman (presumably Villafaña) and a text excerpt describing her frustration during legal negotiations. It quotes a communication from Villafaña to Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz, dated December 13, 2007, in which she claims to have 'bent over backwards' to accommodate the effects of an agreement on Mr. Epstein.
Lefkowitz informed Villafaña that the defense was rejecting the federal plea and wanted a 'state-charges-only agreement'.
Lefkowitz emailed Villafaña about discrepancies in the jail sentence terms in the draft NPA and asked about flexibility on the § 2255 procedure.
Villafaña sent a letter to Lefkowitz responding to allegations that she had committed misconduct, specifically addressing 'false' allegations.
Acosta's reply about being happy to talk but wanting [M]arie on the call to avoid undermining staff during negotiations and allowing interlocutory appeals.
Transmittal email for revised NPA, stated "we have not and don't plan to ask immigration" proceedings to be initiated.
Publicly released emails that drew criticism when the media learned of them during the CVRA litigation.
Lefkowitz emailed Villafaña about a draft NPA with a 20-month jail sentence and 10 months of community control, questioning USAO flexibility on the § 2255 procedure, contrasting it with 18 months jail and 12 months community control.
Lefkowitz responded by letter suggesting Acosta's proposal raised 'troubling questions' due to incongruity of fitting federal civil remedies into a criminal plea agreement.
Lefkowitz sent a new version of the NPA to Villafaña which included a confidentiality term for the first time.
Numerous email exchanges occurred between Lefkowitz and Villafaña throughout a Sunday evening.
Revised plea agreement proposing immunity for four female assistants and withdrawal of legal process for computers.
Notified that Epstein had until close of business June 30, 2008 to comply with agreement terms including guilty plea and surrender.
Notified that the plea deadline was postponed pending DOJ review.
Lefkowitz reached out to Acosta to request a meeting, arguing that CEOS's letter raised several points justifying further discussion, such as the 'novel application' of statutes and unaddressed misconduct allegations.
Stated Acosta would not respond personally; set June 2 deadline for NPA compliance.
Lefkowitz wrote to Acosta to confirm they would initiate the review process with Drew Oosterbaan but expressed misgivings due to Oosterbaan's stated readiness to prosecute the case himself.
Sloman informed Lefkowitz that CEOS was ready to proceed with the review and outlined the consequences depending on CEOS's decision regarding federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein.
Discussion about helping the process move forward and whether CEOS should partner with USAO
Oosterbaan offered to take a fresh and objective look at the case and arguments to help move the process forward, suggesting CEOS should not partner with USAO if they take that objective role.
Objecting to CVRA notification but agreeing some notice be given by the State Attorney.
Asserted FBI should not communicate with victims and that victims were not relevant to state prosecution.
Lefkowitz notified Acosta that the defense team might pursue a department review if issues were not resolved promptly.
Villafaña expresses frustration, stating she felt she 'bent over backwards' to consider the effect of the agreement on Mr. Epstein.
Villafaña expressing frustration about a dispute resolution and stating she 'bent over backwards' to consider the agreement's effect on Epstein.
Villafaña expresses frustration, claiming she 'bent over backwards' to consider the effect of the agreement on Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity