SDNY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of investigation prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI NY
|
Coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAFLS
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI Squad C-20
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Epstein
|
Involved in open criminal matter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Institutional oversight communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Entity]
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MoneyGram International
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Investigative Team
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Adjourned trial date for US v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Large Case-Related Expenses Request Submission | Washington, DC | View |
| N/A | N/A | Start of investigation into Nine Trey Gangsta Bloods | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussions with SDNY | New York | View |
| 2023-04-17 | N/A | Deadline for SDNY to provide results of factual accuracy and sensitivity review of the OIG draft ... | N/A | View |
| 2023-04-10 | N/A | Transmission of draft OIG report to SDNY. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Charges dismissed against Thomas and Noel after fulfilling agreement terms. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Scheduled start of Ghislaine Maxwell trial in New York. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-27 | N/A | Original due date for the joint proposed request to charge (RTC) to the Court. | The Court (Judge Nathan) | View |
| 2021-09-21 | N/A | Production of travel records | New York | View |
| 2021-07-30 | N/A | CBP Officer confirms limitation of data: Outbound travel records between 1990-2000 were not recor... | New York | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Release of redacted autopsy report to 'the Times' and transmission to OCME. | New York | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Courtesy notice provided to Mark Epstein's attorney regarding the autopsy release. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-05-25 | N/A | Deferred prosecution agreements entered for Thomas and Noel. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | SDNY issues a second subpoena for 'additional student records'. | New York / Michigan | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | SDNY serves additional subpoena for student records. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-12-08 | N/A | Accepted: Call w. SDNY re. USVI Epstein Litigation | Redacted | View |
| 2020-12-07 | N/A | Renewed bail application filing for Ghislaine Maxwell (mentioned as 'Monday'). | New York | View |
| 2020-12-02 | N/A | Notification of Intent to File Bail Application | New York | View |
| 2020-11-20 | N/A | Maxwell Review Drives from SDNY - Inventory of originals and responsive materials | SDNY | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Transmittal of OPR's final Report in the Jeffrey Epstein matter to SDNY | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between Jeff Jocks and SDNY to discuss subpoena results. | Phone/Conference Line | View |
| 2020-10-30 | N/A | Shipment of Hard Drive via FedEx | Falls Church to NY | View |
| 2020-10-30 | N/A | Jeff Jocks confirms Interlochen has no records of payments by Epstein or his entities. | View | |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Call with SDNY regarding discovery and the Epstein investigation | Conference Call: 844-215-69... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000919.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the indictment against Ms. Maxwell is a direct consequence of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the resulting media frenzy, positioning her as a 'scapegoat'. The author contends that the case against her is weak, citing the lack of charges against her in 2019 alongside Epstein or in his 2008 Florida case. The document also notes that the government recently superseded the indictment to add a new anonymous accuser.
DOJ-OGR-00000906.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, which failed to comply with court rules, specifically being 'Not Text-Searchable'. The notice lists various reasons for non-compliance with FRAP and Local Rules.
DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
This is a Notice of Defective Filing from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Dated April 1, 2021, it notifies the defense that a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on March 30, 2021, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules. The document lists various potential reasons for the defect, though no specific reason is visually checked on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00000838.jpg
This is a Docketing Notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770), dated March 29, 2021. It notifies counsel that the appeal has been docketed and provides instructions regarding the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, which must be returned within 14 days. The document references the lower court case (1:20-cr-330-1) presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00000835.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Case Manager Change from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Epstein, dated August 21, 2019. It lists Judge Berman as the District Court Judge and provides a phone number for inquiries.
DOJ-OGR-00000446.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues against granting release to a defendant named Epstein, asserting that his immense wealth and financial sophistication create an irrebuttable presumption that he is a flight risk. The document quotes previous court transcripts and letters to argue that Epstein could easily transfer assets abroad, become a fugitive, and continue to earn millions, making any conditions of release, including a bond, meaningless.
DOJ-OGR-00000432.jpg
This legal document, part of a filing to Judge Richard M. Berman, argues against the government's position that Jeffrey Epstein's wealth creates an 'irrebuttable presumption' that he is a flight risk and should be denied release. The filing contends that this amounts to a 'per se rule' that is contrary to law. It cites government arguments from other court records which detail Epstein's financial sophistication, international ties, and ability to transfer assets and earn millions abroad as reasons why no bail conditions could be effective.
DOJ-OGR-00020734.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) printed on February 22, 2023. It lists filings entered on August 10, 2022, which are official transcripts and notices of filing for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The transcripts cover trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 21, 22, 27, and 28, 2021, transcribed by Paula Speer.
DOJ-OGR-00020733.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) generated on February 22, 2023, listing filings entered on August 10, 2022. The filings (entries 762-768) relate to the official transcripts of trial proceedings for Ghislaine Maxwell held between December 16 and December 20, 2021, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan and transcribed by Paula Speer. The entries establish deadlines for redaction requests and indicate when the transcripts will be available to the public via PACER.
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.
DOJ-OGR-00020726.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), generated on February 28, 2023. It lists entries 700 through 711, all entered on July 12, 2022, which document various letters and motions exchanged between the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel (Menninger, Pagliuca, Everdell) and Judge Alison J. Nathan during late 2021. Key topics include an arrest warrant for Kelly Bovino, testimony of Stephen Flatley, motions to preclude defense witnesses, and issues regarding video monitors and prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020723.jpg
A page from a court docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 25-26, 2022. The entries include motions regarding victim impact statements, letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and the USA, and judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning sentencing procedures and the defendant's access to legal materials at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020722.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020720.jpg
This court docket page from the SDNY details proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between April and June 2022. Key entries include an April 29 opinion where Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion for acquittal but granted a motion regarding 'multiplicity,' resulting in convictions being consolidated into Counts Three, Four, and Six. The document explicitly links Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein as a 'continuous coconspirator' in grooming and abusing underage girls. It also documents scheduling for her sentencing on June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00020719.jpg
This document is a court docket report for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering March 15 to April 26, 2022. Major events include the denial of Maxwell's motion for a new trial following allegations regarding Juror 50's non-disclosure of prior abuse, which the court deemed not deliberate. The docket also details administrative corrections regarding judge assignment, the scheduling of the sentencing for June 28, 2022, and the establishment of deadlines for the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR).
DOJ-OGR-00020716.jpg
This document represents a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 3, 2022. The entries focus heavily on post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50', who was scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2022. Key developments include Juror 50's attorney notifying the court that the juror intended to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Government's subsequent notification that they were seeking approval to compel the juror's testimony via immunity orders (18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003).
DOJ-OGR-00020714.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 24, 2022. It contains a significant Order (Entry 610) by Judge Alison J. Nathan granting a post-verdict evidentiary hearing to investigate whether 'Juror 50' failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, citing media interviews given by the juror. The document also notes administrative motions to intervene and a letter from the prosecution team (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 11 and February 24, 2022. It details motions for a new trial filed by the defense, communications regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity (specifically Juror 50), and the granting of an amicus curiae brief. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (USA), the defense team (Sternheim, Everdell), and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020710.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from January 14, 2022, to January 26, 2022. Key events include Judge Nathan scheduling Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and granting an exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act until April 2022 to allow for post-trial motions. The docket also records various letters from media organizations (Miami Herald, ABC, NBC, NY Times) regarding the unsealing of documents related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020709.jpg
This document contains a series of docket entries from January 2022 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily concern 'Juror Number 50,' who retained private counsel (Todd Spodek) regarding a potential post-trial inquiry into juror misconduct or eligibility. Judge Nathan issued orders managing the scheduling of motions, addressing the juror's request to intervene, and handling the sealing and redaction of the juror's questionnaire and voir dire records.
DOJ-OGR-00020708.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log detailing proceedings in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 27, 2021, and January 5, 2022. It records the conclusion of the jury trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, and subsequent orders regarding post-trial motions and scheduling. Additionally, it notes correspondence regarding juror issues and a request for a vaccine booster for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020707.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity