Jack Scarola
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted Plaintiff]
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant vs counsel for victims |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Scott
|
Opposing counsel co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
No prior communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James E. Hill
|
Professional press |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert C. Josefsberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witnesses who testified
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Upcoming trial in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Malicious prosecution suit against Epstein likely to go to trial. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | Legal request and opposition | The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, made a request to call Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert G... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Representation/bringing to government | Jack Scarola represented Carolyn and brought her to the government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jack Scarola talked to other witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness, Carolyn, filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-04 | N/A | Case in state court pitting Bradley Edwards against Epstein | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2021-05-03 | N/A | Issuance and distribution of an Order regarding the trial date in United States v. Ghislaine Maxw... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-26 | N/A | Conference between Jack Scarola and the witness regarding testimony. | Florida (presumed) | View |
| 2021-01-21 | N/A | Approximate date of AUSA's trip to Florida to meet Jack Scarola (referenced as 'last week' in Jan... | Florida | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/meeting with the witness at Jack Scarola's office. | Jack Scarola's Office | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Video interview/meeting with witness, Jack Scarola, Mike, and FBI/Prosecutors via WebEx. | Jack Scarola's Office (Conf... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn, through her lawyer, responds and gets in touch with the government, right after the vict... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Jack Scarola informs SDNY prosecutors about a victim willing to testify regarding molestation and... | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Miami federal prosecutors sent a letter recusing themselves from the case. | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn's lawyer, Jack Scarola, contacted the government. | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Scarola put Trump on the witness list. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to File an Over Length Reply by Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Withdrawal in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-02-03 | N/A | Electronic filing and service of legal documents through the Clerk of Broward County | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00032477.pdf
An email chain from July 2021 discussing a voicemail received from Congresswoman Lois Frankel (FL). Frankel indicated that Congress intends to look into the Epstein case. The email mentions attorney Jack Scarola, who represents a redacted client, provided Frankel with the recipient's contact information. The sender suggests routing the inquiry to OLA (Office of Legislative Affairs) for a formal response.
EFTA00030893.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Jack Scarola dated February 13, 2021, regarding evidence in the Epstein case. Scarola attaches a photo of a victim taken around the time of her abuse and notes her recollection that critical topless photos were also taken. The document includes a standard legal disclaimer from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
EFTA00030511.pdf
An email dated July 30, 2019, circulating a South Florida Sun Sentinel article. The article discusses the legal conflict regarding Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, noting that while some victims want new charges in Florida following his New York arrest, prosecutors argue others wish to avoid reopening the case to protect their privacy. Lawyers for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 argue that the privacy concerns of some should not prevent the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators.
EFTA00029458.pdf
This document consists of an exchange of letters between Paul G. Cassell of the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law and an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard (Metropolitan Police). In the first letter (July 31, 2015), Cassell follows up on previous correspondence regarding allegations of international sex trafficking against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, offering his client's assistance in the investigation. In the response (August 10, 2015), the Metropolitan Police confirm they are progressing with the matter and request formal written confirmation that Cassell is legally authorized to represent the specific client involved.
EFTA00029457.pdf
A letter dated July 31, 2015, from Paul G. Cassell (University of Utah College of Law) to an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard. Cassell is following up on a previous correspondence from May 2015 regarding an investigation into international sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. He reiterates his client's (name redacted) offer to assist with the investigation.
EFTA00027949.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Scarola identifies a victim who was molested in Florida beginning at age 14 and received lingerie gifts from Epstein. The correspondence coordinates a potential meeting between federal investigators and the victim in Florida.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00027350.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding a victim's willingness to testify in an upcoming trial (scheduled for July 12, 2021, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence focuses on the logistics of the witness's testimony, specifically her requirement that her husband and three minor children accompany her to New York. The AUSA confirms that the government (SDNY/FBI Victim Services) will fund the travel and hotel accommodations for the entire family to secure her testimony.
EFTA00027346.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from March 9-10, 2020, between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York. The AUSA is seeking to interview a woman (name redacted) regarding an investigation. Scarola indicates that his own attempts to contact the woman have been ignored and provides her phone number to the AUSA, stating he has no objection to them contacting her directly.
EFTA00025398.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2020 between the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). OPR is seeking to interview 32 individuals regarding their historical contacts (2005-2008) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and FBI Miami concerning the Epstein case. SDNY agrees to the interviews but requests that OPR avoid discussing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme or interactions with Epstein to avoid interfering with SDNY's active investigation, noting that any relevant statements must be handled as '3500 material' (Jencks Act). The correspondence lists the legal representation for the 32 individuals, noting the majority are represented by Brad Edwards.
EFTA00024996.pdf
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the transmission of 'Discovery Responses' filed on behalf of a redacted female client in a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender, Chris R. Rodgers, confirms the attachment of these legal documents.
EFTA00024995.pdf
This document is an email dated January 19, 2021, from Chris R. Rodgers to Jack Scarola and others, attaching discovery responses for a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The email originates from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. The plaintiff's name is redacted, but the email references filings made on her behalf.
EFTA00024660.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and likely FBI/prosecutors arranging a WebEx interview for a witness/victim in the Epstein case. Scarola provides a summary 'proffer' or list of the witness's interactions, stating she saw Epstein over 100 times, met Ghislaine Maxwell ~10 times (including seeing nude photos of her), and was transported by Epstein's drivers ~50 times. The emails confirm the logistical details for the interview to take place on July 17, 2020, at Scarola's office.
EFTA00023750.pdf
This document is an email thread from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The discussion concerns locating a 2009 deposition transcript from a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ('[Redacted] vs Epstein'). Since the court reporting service and videographer could not locate the original records, Scarola provided detailed notes taken by paralegal Mike Danchuk, describing the testimony as revealing Epstein's pattern of grooming and victimization. USANYS also mentions coordinating with Epstein Estate attorneys Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback to obtain the transcript.
EFTA00023699.pdf
This document is an email chain from September and October 2020 between Marc A. Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The SDNY requested a specific deposition transcript from a 2009 lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein involving a plaintiff represented by Jack Scarola. Weinstein coordinated with Scarola to ensure there were no protective orders preventing disclosure before providing the transcript to the SDNY on behalf of the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00023624.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
EFTA00022517.pdf
This document is an email dated May 3, 2021, sent from a representative of the Southern District of New York to attorney Jack Scarola. The email serves to transmit an attached court order regarding the trial date in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00021332.pdf
An email chain from August to October 2019 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. Scarola introduces a victim who was molested by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida starting at age 14 and received lingerie gifts from him. The prosecutors express strong interest in interviewing the victim and offer to travel to Florida to do so, following up multiple times to arrange the meeting.
EFTA00020870.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between Marc Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request for a 2009 deposition transcript of a plaintiff represented by attorney Jack Scarola in a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Weinstein coordinates with the SDNY and Scarola to ensure no protective orders prevent the disclosure before ultimately providing the transcripts.
EFTA00020703.pdf
This document is a Notice of Filing containing a transcript of a telephone interview conducted by attorneys Bradley Edwards and Jack Scarola with a former employee/victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The witness details Epstein flying in 12-year-old girls from France for his birthday, his claims that powerful people 'owed him,' and an attempt by Epstein and his lawyers to silence her in 2007 with offers to be 'looked after.' The witness also describes a 'sick proposition' where Epstein offered to pay her to bear a child that he and Ghislaine Maxwell would raise, before she eventually escaped his control by marrying a man she met in Thailand in 2002.
EFTA00018031.pdf
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorney Jack Scarola. The email serves to notify Scarola of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that the rule applies to attorneys associated with a case, including attorneys for witnesses. The document includes a Bates number EFTA00018031.
EFTA00016311.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the search for a specific deposition transcript and video from December 4, 2009, in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ([Redacted] vs Epstein). The court reporter and videography service confirmed they could not locate the records. Consequently, Scarola provided notes taken contemporaneously by his paralegal/investigator Mike Danchuk, noting that the witness described Epstein's pattern of recruitment and grooming.
EFTA00016304.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They discuss the inability to locate the official transcript and video of a deposition from December 4, 2009, related to a case against Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of the official record, Scarola provides contemporaneous notes taken by a paralegal, noting that they describe 'troubled young women' susceptible to Epstein's 'recruitment, grooming and victimization.'
EFTA00015963.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and likely FBI/DOJ officials arranging a WebEx interview for a client/witness regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The emails contain a detailed proffer or summary of the witness's interactions, stating she saw Epstein over 100 times, was picked up by his drivers 50 times, and met Ghislaine Maxwell approximately 10 times at the Palm Beach residence. The witness also recalls seeing nude photos of Maxwell and mentions interactions with housekeeping staff and cooks.
EFTA00014033.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2008 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted). The AUSA sends the 'Epstein NonProsecution Agrmt w Addendum.pdf' to Scarola with strict instructions that it only be disclosed to staff who have signed a Protective Order. Scarola responds confirming he will follow the instructions.
Edwards adv. Epstein Interview
Discussion regarding Virginia's comfort level in naming names and her travel history with Jeffrey Epstein.
[EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Discussing privacy concerns regarding files and disclosures made to the Fund under confidentiality assurances.
Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Informing Jack about a motion filed by Maxwell's counsel to subpoena the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and stating intent to file a motion to quash.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Notification regarding a recent order from Judge Nathan concerning Local Criminal Rule 23.1, clarifying its application to attorneys associated with a case, such as attorneys for witnesses.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding an attached order concerning the trial date for the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
RE Request for information
Sender provides a picture of a victim taken around the time of her abuse by Epstein. Mentions the victim recalls topless photos were taken which would be critical evidence.
Funding Confirmation
Confirms SDNY can pay for the witness, husband, and three minor children to travel to NY and for a hotel suite.
RE: [Redacted]
AUSA thanks Jack and confirms they will work with FBI Victim Services to figure out funding logistics.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack accepts the news and pledges support.
Follow up
Asking for an update, noting steps needed to expand the case to include the witness's testimony.
Re: [Redacted]
Confirms witness is willing to testify but requires her husband and children to travel with her. Requests government commitment for funding travel.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack confirms he is scheduled to conference with the witness tomorrow afternoon.
Checking in
AUSA checking if the witness has made a decision about testifying. Mentions a recent trip to Florida.
RE: [Redacted] - Discovery Responses
Attached please find the Discovery Responses filed on [Redacted] behalf in her civil matter against Epstein.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack confirms he is available right now.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Discussing contact with Epstein Estate attorneys (Weinstein and Tomback) regarding the release of the transcript. Confirms limited details were shared about Scarola's client.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating he is unaware of any protective order relating to the CMA case.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking about protective orders in the civil suit that might govern disclosure.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Inquiry about whether a protective order exists in the civil suit that would govern disclosing materials.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack states he is unaware of any protective order relating to the case.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking if USANYS was able to locate the transcript.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating they will likely reach out to the adversary in the deposition to ask for a copy.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Acknowledging receipt of email; mentioning they will reach out to the adversary to ask for a copy of the deposition.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Forwarding confirmation that the deposition transcript cannot be found. Attaching notes from paralegal Mike Danchuk instead.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Informing USANYS that the original deposition transcript and video are lost; attaching paralegal notes instead; commenting on the nature of the testimony regarding Epstein's victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity