Jack Scarola
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted Plaintiff]
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant vs counsel for victims |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Scott
|
Opposing counsel co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
No prior communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James E. Hill
|
Professional press |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert C. Josefsberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witnesses who testified
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Upcoming trial in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Malicious prosecution suit against Epstein likely to go to trial. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | Legal request and opposition | The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, made a request to call Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert G... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Representation/bringing to government | Jack Scarola represented Carolyn and brought her to the government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jack Scarola talked to other witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness, Carolyn, filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-04 | N/A | Case in state court pitting Bradley Edwards against Epstein | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2021-05-03 | N/A | Issuance and distribution of an Order regarding the trial date in United States v. Ghislaine Maxw... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-26 | N/A | Conference between Jack Scarola and the witness regarding testimony. | Florida (presumed) | View |
| 2021-01-21 | N/A | Approximate date of AUSA's trip to Florida to meet Jack Scarola (referenced as 'last week' in Jan... | Florida | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/meeting with the witness at Jack Scarola's office. | Jack Scarola's Office | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Video interview/meeting with witness, Jack Scarola, Mike, and FBI/Prosecutors via WebEx. | Jack Scarola's Office (Conf... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn, through her lawyer, responds and gets in touch with the government, right after the vict... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Jack Scarola informs SDNY prosecutors about a victim willing to testify regarding molestation and... | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Miami federal prosecutors sent a letter recusing themselves from the case. | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn's lawyer, Jack Scarola, contacted the government. | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Scarola put Trump on the witness list. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to File an Over Length Reply by Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Withdrawal in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-02-03 | N/A | Electronic filing and service of legal documents through the Clerk of Broward County | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029323.jpg
This document is the final page (Page 9) of a legal letter dated September 12, 2013, written by attorney Jack Scarola. The text argues against the use of 'litigation privilege' to hide a 'life of perversion' and states that 'Epstein’s day of public reckoning is inevitable.' The letter references an upcoming mediation and copies several attorneys involved in the Epstein legal cases, including Bradley Edwards and Jack Goldberger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016201.jpg
This document is a page from a legal affidavit (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the legal strategies and settlements involving Virginia Giuffre, Bradley Edwards, and Alan Dershowitz. The narrator refutes Dershowitz's claims that a previous settlement exonerated him, clarifying that Giuffre stands by her allegations and that the settlement was a tactical decision regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act case. It also explicitly denies Dershowitz's allegations that attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley were involved in an 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner in 2014.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863). It involves questioning by Mr. Simpson regarding the timeline of a written agreement relative to December 30, 2014, and references a 'motion for joinder' (Exhibit 2) that concerns 'other minors' in addition to Virginia Roberts. The text lists several legal entities involved in Virginia Roberts' representation, including Boies Schiller, Bradley J. Edwards, and the Utah Attorney General's office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021825.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a rough draft transcript for the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell, taken on October 16, 2015, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition relates to the lawsuit 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz.' The transcript lists the legal appearances, including counsel for the plaintiffs, counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz, and counsel for Virginia Roberts (Sigrid McCawley).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014112.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. to attorney Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. regarding the case 'Edwards and Cassell vs. Dershowitz.' The letter addresses discovery disputes, specifically criticizing the recipient's use of 'general objections' and 'subject to' responses as improper tactics that shield information from discovery. It cites federal court precedents disapproving of such objections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014111.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It certifies that attorneys Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. served legal documents on behalf of their client, Alan M. Dershowitz, to plaintiff's counsel Jack Scarola via E-Serve on February 23, 2015. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014097.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It certifies that attorney Jack Scarola sent a copy of the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents via E-Serve on March 2, 2015. The document includes Scarola's contact information at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and bears a House Oversight stamp.
Edwards adv. Epstein Interview
Discussion regarding Virginia's comfort level in naming names and her travel history with Jeffrey Epstein.
[EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Discussing privacy concerns regarding files and disclosures made to the Fund under confidentiality assurances.
Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Informing Jack about a motion filed by Maxwell's counsel to subpoena the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and stating intent to file a motion to quash.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Notification regarding a recent order from Judge Nathan concerning Local Criminal Rule 23.1, clarifying its application to attorneys associated with a case, such as attorneys for witnesses.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding an attached order concerning the trial date for the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
RE Request for information
Sender provides a picture of a victim taken around the time of her abuse by Epstein. Mentions the victim recalls topless photos were taken which would be critical evidence.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack accepts the news and pledges support.
Funding Confirmation
Confirms SDNY can pay for the witness, husband, and three minor children to travel to NY and for a hotel suite.
RE: [Redacted]
AUSA thanks Jack and confirms they will work with FBI Victim Services to figure out funding logistics.
Follow up
Asking for an update, noting steps needed to expand the case to include the witness's testimony.
Re: [Redacted]
Confirms witness is willing to testify but requires her husband and children to travel with her. Requests government commitment for funding travel.
Checking in
AUSA checking if the witness has made a decision about testifying. Mentions a recent trip to Florida.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack confirms he is scheduled to conference with the witness tomorrow afternoon.
RE: [Redacted] - Discovery Responses
Attached please find the Discovery Responses filed on [Redacted] behalf in her civil matter against Epstein.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack confirms he is available right now.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Discussing contact with Epstein Estate attorneys (Weinstein and Tomback) regarding the release of the transcript. Confirms limited details were shared about Scarola's client.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking about protective orders in the civil suit that might govern disclosure.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating he is unaware of any protective order relating to the CMA case.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Inquiry about whether a protective order exists in the civil suit that would govern disclosing materials.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack states he is unaware of any protective order relating to the case.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Acknowledging receipt of email; mentioning they will reach out to the adversary to ask for a copy of the deposition.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating they will likely reach out to the adversary in the deposition to ask for a copy.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking if USANYS was able to locate the transcript.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Forwarding confirmation that the deposition transcript cannot be found. Attaching notes from paralegal Mike Danchuk instead.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Informing USANYS that the original deposition transcript and video are lost; attaching paralegal notes instead; commenting on the nature of the testimony regarding Epstein's victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity