Jack Scarola
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted Plaintiff]
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial defendant vs counsel for victims |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Scott
|
Opposing counsel co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
No prior communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
James E. Hill
|
Professional press |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaintiffs
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert C. Josefsberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witnesses who testified
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Upcoming trial in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Malicious prosecution suit against Epstein likely to go to trial. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| N/A | Legal request and opposition | The defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, made a request to call Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert G... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Representation/bringing to government | Jack Scarola represented Carolyn and brought her to the government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jack Scarola talked to other witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness, Carolyn, filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The witness filed a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-04 | N/A | Case in state court pitting Bradley Edwards against Epstein | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2021-05-03 | N/A | Issuance and distribution of an Order regarding the trial date in United States v. Ghislaine Maxw... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-26 | N/A | Conference between Jack Scarola and the witness regarding testimony. | Florida (presumed) | View |
| 2021-01-21 | N/A | Approximate date of AUSA's trip to Florida to meet Jack Scarola (referenced as 'last week' in Jan... | Florida | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/meeting with the witness at Jack Scarola's office. | Jack Scarola's Office | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Video interview/meeting with witness, Jack Scarola, Mike, and FBI/Prosecutors via WebEx. | Jack Scarola's Office (Conf... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn, through her lawyer, responds and gets in touch with the government, right after the vict... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Jack Scarola informs SDNY prosecutors about a victim willing to testify regarding molestation and... | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Miami federal prosecutors sent a letter recusing themselves from the case. | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal action | Carolyn's lawyer, Jack Scarola, contacted the government. | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Scarola put Trump on the witness list. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to File an Over Length Reply by Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Withdrawal in Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-02-03 | N/A | Electronic filing and service of legal documents through the Clerk of Broward County | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019, included as a legal exhibit and part of a House Oversight production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017967). It details the legal battle between Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards, represented by Jack Scarola, regarding allegations of malfeasance. The article also provides background on Virginia Roberts, detailing her troubled youth and victimization by sex trafficker Ron Eppinger in Miami prior to her involvement with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017804.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019. The article discusses a legal battle between Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards, who represents Epstein's victims, and details the background of victim Virginia Roberts, including her prior trafficking by Ron Eppinger. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017491.jpg
This document is a four-page excerpt (pages 2-5) of a deposition transcript for witness Scott Rothstein. The transcript lists appearances by attorneys including Jack Goldberger (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Scarola (representing Brad Edwards). Notably, Darryn Indyke is present and identified as Epstein's in-house counsel. The questioning begins regarding a 'scheme' at Rothstein's firm that allegedly started in 2005 or 2006.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service signed by attorney Jack Scarola on November 4, 2010. It certifies that copies of a preceding legal filing were served via Fax and U.S. Mail to a service list. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023130.jpg
This document, likely a House Oversight exhibit referencing a Miami Herald investigation, details the lenient treatment Jeffrey Epstein received from federal prosecutors. It highlights how prosecutors, specifically Marie Villafaña and Acosta, communicated privately with Epstein's defense team (led by Jay Lefkowitz) to avoid paper trails and agreed to keep the non-prosecution deal secret, effectively bypassing the Crime Victims Rights Act. The text contrasts the prosecutors' view of the crimes as a 'local sex case' with the victims' lawyer's assertion of international sex trafficking involving over 40 identified victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022990.jpg
This document is a news article from May 2017 discussing Donald Trump's connection to Jeffrey Epstein in the context of ongoing legal battles. It highlights that while Trump was named in a lawsuit and placed on a witness list by attorney Jack Scarola for a case involving attorney Brad Edwards, Scarola admits Trump is unlikely to testify and describes his involvement as "peripheral." The article also mentions Mar-a-Lago as a location where Epstein allegedly met a victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022989.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Post article by Jane Musgrave regarding President Donald Trump's potential involvement as a witness in an upcoming Jeffrey Epstein trial. It discusses a past lawsuit accusing both men of assault, identifies Mar-a-Lago as a location where Epstein met a victim, and quotes attorney Jack Scarola regarding the upcoming legal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011945.jpg
This article reports on court filings revealing links between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 modeling agency owner Jean Luc Brunel, alleging they brought underage girls into the country with promises of modeling contracts. The documents state that Epstein provided financial support to MC2 and used his New York condos to house models, while also attempting to block depositions of high-profile associates like Guislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015655.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated February 8, 2016, signed by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley. It certifies the electronic service of a legal filing to counsel for the defendant, Alan Dershowitz (represented by Cole, Scott & Kissane and Wiley Rein), and counsel for the plaintiffs (represented by Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley). The document lists specific attorneys and their email addresses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015637.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.jpg
This email from Susan Moss, Judicial Assistant to Judge Thomas M. Lynch IV, conveys court rulings in the case of Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The judge quashed a subpoena against the law firm Boies Schiller but granted parts of a subpoena regarding 'Jane Doe #3,' while establishing strict protocols for a future deposition, including a 4-hour limit and the requirement of a Defendant-paid special master to rule on objections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015612.jpg
A legal Certificate of Service dated April 9, 2015, signed by Sigrid S. McCawley. The document certifies the electronic service of legal filings to attorneys representing Alan Dershowitz (Wiley Rein, LLP) and attorneys for the Plaintiffs (Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.), as well as attorneys at Cole, Scott & Kissane. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015597.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated February 3, 2016, filed in Broward County, Florida. It certifies that Thomas E. Scott electronically served legal documents to several prominent attorneys involved in Epstein-related litigation, including Jack Scarola, Bradley Edwards, Paul Cassell, and Sigrid McCawley. The document lists the specific email and physical addresses for each recipient.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015585.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 2015 between James Hill of ABC News and attorney Jack Scarola. Hill is inquiring about a NY Daily News article citing a Juan Alessi deposition regarding Prince Andrew, and specifically requests a transcript of a 2011 interview Scarola conducted with Virginia Roberts while she was in Australia. The top of the document contains an internal query about whether the Virginia interview is public record, with a handwritten note instructing to 'TAKE THIS OUT'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 23, 2015, between Donna Paine, a freelance TV producer for ITN News, and attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. Paine is requesting to be added to a media contact list in anticipation of a ruling by Judge Marra regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case and specific allegations made by Jane Doe #3 against Prince Andrew. Cassell confirms he will have his assistant, Joan, add Paine to their contacts list.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015567.jpg
This document is page 12 of a transcript from a telephone interview between Virginia Roberts and Jack Scarola (JS) related to the case Edwards adv. Epstein. Virginia expresses fear about naming 'influential' people who received 'erotic massages.' The interview then shifts to establishing the timeline of her travel with Jeffrey Epstein, noting that domestic travel began immediately upon their relationship starting, while international travel began approximately a year later (around Summer 1999).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015556.jpg
This document is a transcript of a teleconference dated April 7, 2011, marked as privileged work product. Attorneys Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards are interviewing Virginia Roberts regarding the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein.' The transcript covers the opening of the call, including Scarola obtaining permission to record the conversation and establishing that he had not communicated with Roberts previously.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015552.jpg
This is a 'Notice of Filing' from May 17, 2011, in a civil case where Jeffrey Epstein is suing Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, and L.M. Attorney Jack Scarola, representing Bradley Edwards, is filing a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts. This evidence is intended to support a motion to amend the counter-claim to assert punitive damages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013481.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (Pages 1-4) of a videotaped deposition of Bradley J. Edwards, taken on March 23, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Notable attendees included Jeffrey Epstein himself and his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013440.jpg
This document is a 2011 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reporting that Circuit Judge David Crow dismissed a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against attorney Brad Edwards and denied Epstein's request for a gag order. Epstein had accused Edwards, who represented victims, of 'abuse of process' for threatening to depose powerful figures like Donald Trump and Bill Clinton. The article notes the legal arguments between Epstein's lawyer Joseph Ackerman and Edwards' lawyer Jack Scarola regarding media statements and the validity of the complaint.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013392.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on November 3, 2011. It is signed by attorney Jack Scarola of the firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, certifying that a preceding legal document was served via Fax and U.S. Mail to a service list. The document is numbered page 23 and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013360.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated November 4, 2010, signed by attorney Jack Scarola of the law firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. It certifies that a preceding legal document was served via Fax and U.S. Mail to recipients on an attached service list. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp number 013360.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029860.jpg
A 2017 Palm Beach Post article reveals that Jeffrey Epstein paid a total of $5.5 million to settle lawsuits with three young women (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) represented by attorney Bradley Edwards. The specific settlement amounts ($1M, $2M, and $2.5M) were disclosed in court documents after Epstein's attorneys compelled Edwards to answer questions in a related lawsuit. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.jpg
This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029518.jpg
A Virgin Islands Daily News article from December 2018 details Jeffrey Epstein's settlement of a defamation lawsuit with attorney Bradley Edwards just before trial. The article discusses the renewed scrutiny on Epstein's 2008 plea deal approved by Alexander Acosta, mentions his connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew, and notes ongoing efforts by victims to nullify the original non-prosecution agreement.
Edwards adv. Epstein Interview
Discussion regarding Virginia's comfort level in naming names and her travel history with Jeffrey Epstein.
[EXTERNAL] Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Discussing privacy concerns regarding files and disclosures made to the Fund under confidentiality assurances.
Re: EXTERNAL Rule 17(c) subpoena
Informing Jack about a motion filed by Maxwell's counsel to subpoena the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and stating intent to file a motion to quash.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Notification regarding a recent order from Judge Nathan concerning Local Criminal Rule 23.1, clarifying its application to attorneys associated with a case, such as attorneys for witnesses.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding an attached order concerning the trial date for the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
RE Request for information
Sender provides a picture of a victim taken around the time of her abuse by Epstein. Mentions the victim recalls topless photos were taken which would be critical evidence.
RE: [Redacted]
AUSA thanks Jack and confirms they will work with FBI Victim Services to figure out funding logistics.
Funding Confirmation
Confirms SDNY can pay for the witness, husband, and three minor children to travel to NY and for a hotel suite.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack accepts the news and pledges support.
Re: [Redacted]
Confirms witness is willing to testify but requires her husband and children to travel with her. Requests government commitment for funding travel.
Follow up
Asking for an update, noting steps needed to expand the case to include the witness's testimony.
Re: [Redacted]
Jack confirms he is scheduled to conference with the witness tomorrow afternoon.
Checking in
AUSA checking if the witness has made a decision about testifying. Mentions a recent trip to Florida.
RE: [Redacted] - Discovery Responses
Attached please find the Discovery Responses filed on [Redacted] behalf in her civil matter against Epstein.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack confirms he is available right now.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Discussing contact with Epstein Estate attorneys (Weinstein and Tomback) regarding the release of the transcript. Confirms limited details were shared about Scarola's client.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating he is unaware of any protective order relating to the CMA case.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Jack states he is unaware of any protective order relating to the case.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking about protective orders in the civil suit that might govern disclosure.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Inquiry about whether a protective order exists in the civil suit that would govern disclosing materials.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Asking if USANYS was able to locate the transcript.
RE: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Acknowledging receipt of email; mentioning they will reach out to the adversary to ask for a copy of the deposition.
Re: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Stating they will likely reach out to the adversary in the deposition to ask for a copy.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Forwarding confirmation that the deposition transcript cannot be found. Attaching notes from paralegal Mike Danchuk instead.
Fwd: 12/04/09 [Redacted] vs Epstein Deposition Transcript
Informing USANYS that the original deposition transcript and video are lost; attaching paralegal notes instead; commenting on the nature of the testimony regarding Epstein's victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity