| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Author of document (unnamed)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Presiding judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Judge prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden [Redacted]
|
Judicial oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional critical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden [Redacted]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce A. Green
|
Judicial correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden N'Diaye
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judge vs defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
anonymous victim
|
Petitioner judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-05 | Legal filing | A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Document 73 and endorsement by Judge Berman. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of letter regarding CVRA rights and unsealing of grand jury materials. | New York, NY | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Memo Endorsed regarding CVRA implications on unsealing grand jury materials. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-04 | Legal filing | An endorsed memo from an anonymous victim was filed with the court in the case of USA vs. Epstein. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2025-08-04 | N/A | Memo Endorsement / Filing of letter | SDNY | View |
| 2025-08-04 | N/A | Memo Endorsement by Judge Berman ordering the letter to be docketed and filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-04 | N/A | Memo Endorsement | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-25 | N/A | Court Order issued regarding submission procedures | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Court order | Judge Richard M. Berman issued an order directing the Government on how to submit documents to hi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-25 | N/A | Court denies MSW Media, Inc.'s motion to intervene | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2020-05-05 | N/A | Sentencing hearing of Terrance Morgan where Judge Berman criticized BOP conditions. | New York (via video/audio c... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court hearing where attorney Teri Gibbs read victim impact statements into the record for the c... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-29 | Court order | Judge Richard M. Berman officially ordered the dismissal of the case against Jeffrey Epstein. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-08-29 | N/A | Order of Nolle Prosequi electronically filed, dismissing the indictment. | New York | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Judge Richard Berman hand-writes 'Application respectfully denied' on the motion. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Brief hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order proposed by the US Attorney following Epstein's ... | Courtroom 17B, SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Scheduled Hearing | Courtroom 110, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | Hearing | A court hearing in the case of United States v. Epstein, where the court commented on an article ... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Motion to Intervene filed by David Golden and subsequently denied by Judge Richard Berman. | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Court hearing held, transcript of which is incorporated by reference in the order. | New York | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order following Epstein's death, where victims were invited ... | Daniel Patrick Moynihan Uni... | View |
| 2019-08-21 | N/A | Order filed and signed | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-08-19 | Legal filing | A recommendation and direction to file an order of nolle prosequi against defendant Jeffrey Epste... | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is page 4 of a court transcript (filed July 26, 2019) detailing a judge's rationale for denying bail to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights testimony from victims Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild regarding their safety, the seriousness of sex trafficking charges involving minors as young as 14, and evidence of witness intimidation. It also details Epstein's flight risk, citing his private planes, foreign residence in Paris, and items seized from his NYC mansion, including $70,000 cash, diamonds, and a fake Austrian passport.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.
This document is the signature page of a court order from the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It shows consent from both the prosecution, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, and the defense, represented by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the criminal case of the United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, is intended to protect sensitive, confidential, and personal information contained in the discovery materials that the Government will provide to the defense. The purpose is to safeguard the privacy of individuals, prevent impediment to ongoing investigations, and avoid prejudicial pretrial publicity.
This document is the signature page of a court order from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 25, 2019. It shows the agreement and consent of both the U.S. Government, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman's office, and the defense, represented by counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The order was issued by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
This document is the first page of a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490). Judge Richard M. Berman outlines the necessity of restricting the dissemination of discovery materials to protect the privacy of individuals, prevent interference with ongoing investigations of uncharged individuals, and avoid prejudicial pretrial publicity.
This document is a letter dated July 25, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (specifically Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution requests the Court to endorse a proposed protective order in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, noting that defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten) have consented to the order.
Page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490 (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 24, 2019. Defense counsel argues for the defendant's release, citing his compliance with past registration (since 2010), jail time, and probation, while asserting that the Southern District of New York was not 'detached' from the Florida non-prosecution agreement. The Judge (The Court) responds by discussing the 'rebuttable presumption' for detention in cases involving children or young people.
This document is the cover page for a court transcript of a conference held on July 15, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, regarding the case *United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein* (19 CR 490). It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Richard M. Berman, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and the defense team (including Reid Weingarten, Martin Weinberg, and others). The document was filed on July 24, 2019.
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On behalf of defendant Jeffrey Epstein, his counsel Reid Weingarten is appealing a 'Decision & Order Remanding Defendant' that was issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on July 18, 2019. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This document is a court order from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, dated July 18, 2019. It states that the Government's motion for remand (detention) is granted, and the Defense's motion for pretrial release is denied. The order was signed by U.S.D.J. Richard M. Berman.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman, filed on July 17, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claim that an expired Austrian passport was never used, presenting evidence of travel stamps to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia from the 1980s. The government also highlights that Epstein has not clarified how he obtained the passport or if he holds citizenship or residency in any other country.
This is a court order issued by Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 17, 2019. The order pertains to the criminal case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) and reschedules a conference from 9:30 am to 11:30 am on July 18, 2019.
This document is a letter dated July 17, 2019, from attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. The letter is filed in the criminal case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein and serves to submit documents concerning Epstein's registration status in New Mexico. This submission is made at the court's request and is intended to further support Epstein's application for bail.
This document is Page 8 of a defense filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. It provides an explanation for a controversial passport carried by Epstein in the 1980s, claiming it was for protection against hijackers in the Middle East. The text further argues for Epstein's release on bail, asserting that despite intense media scrutiny (specifically from The Miami Herald) and public pressure since November 2018, Epstein traveled extensively yet always returned to the U.S., proving he is not a flight risk.
This document is page 7 of a defense letter to Judge Berman dated July 16, 2019. It addresses two specific points: 1) Refuting Mr. Boies' speculation that payments in late 2018 were to cooperating witnesses, clarifying instead that they were to employees/friends who invoked the Fifth Amendment; and 2) Dismissing the government's concern over an Austrian passport, noting it expired 32 years ago and was never used. The document emphasizes Epstein's religious background in the context of acquiring said passport.
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author asserts that Epstein consistently notified New Mexico official Detective Deborah Anaya of his presence at his residence there. The filing also counters a point made by the judge, arguing against the idea that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years by citing studies suggesting the risk of relapse substantially drops over time for offense-free individuals.
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing to Judge Richard M. Berman arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's release on bond. It states that Epstein's brother, Mark, is prepared to secure a release bond exceeding $100 million of his own net worth. The filing also clarifies that the New Mexico Public Safety Department had previously advised Epstein in 2010 that he was not required to register there for his 2008 Florida conviction.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 24) from July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490). The text argues for the defendant's right to bail, contending that denying bail based on wealth violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It cites specific case law (Brinson, Afyare, Gardner) to argue that the presumption against release in § 1591 prosecutions is rebuttable.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues against granting release to a defendant named Epstein, asserting that his immense wealth and financial sophistication create an irrebuttable presumption that he is a flight risk. The document quotes previous court transcripts and letters to argue that Epstein could easily transfer assets abroad, become a fugitive, and continue to earn millions, making any conditions of release, including a bond, meaningless.
This document is the first page of a legal letter filed on July 16, 2019, by attorney Marc Fernich to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case US v. Epstein. The letter serves to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail in response to government arguments made the previous day. Fernich argues against the government's reliance on the 'rebuttable remand presumption' connected to 18 USC § 1591 charges, contending in a footnote that the statute does not cover the specific conduct at issue.
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution argues for the continued pre-trial detention of the defendant, citing the recent discovery of over $70,000 in cash, 48 loose diamonds, and a large diamond ring in a safe at the defendant's Manhattan residence. The government contends these assets demonstrate the defendant has the capability to flee the jurisdiction and should therefore not be released.
This court filing from July 2019 addresses supplemental evidence for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing, specifically regarding flight risk. The Government notes the discovery of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a different name found in his Manhattan safe, alongside a US passport. The document also references a female co-conspirator (protected by the earlier NPA) and other employees who facilitated the trafficking of minors.
This is a letter dated July 16, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution details two suspicious wire transfers made by Epstein in late 2018, totaling $350,000, to two redacted individuals shortly after the Miami Herald began publishing an exposé on him. One of the recipients is described as a 'potential co-conspirator' from Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement, raising concerns of witness tampering.
This document is the final signature page (page 9 of 9) of a legal filing submitted on July 16, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Attorneys Marc Fernich, Martin Weintraub, and Reid Weingarten address Judge Richard M. Berman, thanking the court and referencing an upcoming appearance scheduled for 'Thursday' (likely July 18, 2019). The document includes a standard electronic signature block and an ECF copy notation.
Judge Berman criticizes an opinion piece written by the recipient, stating it may have been construed as an effort to chill the rights of Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies to speak at a hearing.
Statement regarding the impact of sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein.
Asking to thank the Warden for his prompt response to the Judge's letter.
please thank the Warden for his prompt response to my letter.
Referenced inquiry asking if investigations cover the July 23 incident.
Judge Berman inquired whether the ongoing investigations into the August 10 incident would also cover the earlier July 23 incident.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity