Trove
Sign In Sign Up

SEC

Organization
Mentions
711
Relationships
25
Events
28
Documents
316
Also known as:
Citadel Securities Inc. SIFMA (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association) CMBS (Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (HKSFC) 000 Merrill Lynch Securities, Moscow OOO Merrill Lynch Securities, Moscow (Russia) Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission Russian Security Services Signals Security Agency Army Security Agency Chinese security services Chinese Security Services Hong Kong Security Services Security Studies Program The Center for Security Policy New York Prosecutors Global Security State Prosecutors Signal Security Agency CIA Office of Security United States Prosecutors Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) Secretary of Finance of Mexico House Internal Security Committee prosecutor's offices in Florida Pub. Prosecution Serv. Can. Saudi Electricity (SEC) Secretary of State U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Federal Prosecutors in Florida International Security magazine Amish sect German Parliament (Second Chamber) SecondMarket Hong Kong Security Bureau Bank Secrecy Act Advisory Group Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (Comissão de valores Mobiliários / CVM) Second Life Bard High School Early College schools (BHSEC) Washington D.C. Prosecutor Florida Second District Court of Appeal Delaware Secretary of State Syrian Security Forces Bard High School Early College (BHSEC) Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security Egyptian security authorities Munich Security Conference domainsinseconds.com PRC’s Ministry of State Security Securities and Futures Bureau (Taiwan) Securities and Exchange Board of India Israel Securities Authority Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Russian security services Council for Political and Security Affairs Palestinian Security Forces Manhattan federal prosecutors Commonwealth Secretariat Prosecutor General AKAL Security Homeland Security Corporation Institute for National Security Studies Syrian Security Forces / Army Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe The Second City Center for Security Policy Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force Wexner's security staff Center for a New American Security Egyptian security apparatus Securities and Futures Commission (Hong Kong) Securities and Commodities Authority Securian Ventures Drysdale Securities Corporation OOO Merrill Lynch Securities Podhurst Orseck Florida Division of Securities secureserver.net Kunia Regional Security Operations Center Secretary of State's Office Morphisec CITIC Sec. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n Iraqi Security Forces Broidy's security firm Violent Crime Section Center for Climate and Security FamilySecurityMatters.org Fraud Section Washington D.C. Prosecutors eSpeed Securities, Inc. CITIC Sec SECURITY (SC) Biotech sector (NBI Index) Stanley Security Solutions Violent Crimes Section CrimSec Security Industry Authority (UK) Mossack Fonseca Benham Securities Palm Beach County Prosecutor's Office Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Sparta Security Services Ltd Global Security Advisors Victoria Secret California Secretary of State PricewaterhouseCoopers International Ltd. Dept Homeland Security FBIHQ Violent Crime Section VCS (Violent Crime Section) All Armed Security, Inc. Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. Office of Homeland Security TSA (Transportation Security Administration) FBI Violent Crime Section STG (Security Threat Group) Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Southern District of Florida (Court/Prosecutors) State and federal prosecutors Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) Secretary of State of the State of Delaware ACSC (Australian Cyber Security Centre) FSB (Federal Security Service) Violent Crimes Against Children Section Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Court of Appeals (Second Circuit implied) Aqua Securities, L.P. eSpeed Government Securities, Inc. Securities and Futures Bureau Exec Sec (Executive Secretariat)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
25 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Franklin D. Roosevelt
Administrative
6
1
View
person Frank Gaffney Jr.
Professional
6
2
View
organization MIA
Records request
5
1
View
organization The Street.com
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization TheStreet.Com
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Edward Snowden
Intelligence asset handler implied
5
1
View
organization Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC)
Business associate
5
1
View
person Jamil Nazarali
Employee
5
1
View
organization CME
Unknown
5
1
View
organization MIA
Investigator information provider
5
1
View
organization MIA
Investigative transactional
5
1
View
person Drysdale Government Securities
Corporate structure
5
1
View
person U.S. forces
Advisory training
5
1
View
person Bill Siegel
Employment contributor
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
5
1
View
location USANYS
Inter agency coordination
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Deceptive association
1
1
View
location USANYS
Professional interagency
1
1
View
person Christopher Dilorio
Adversarial
1
1
View
person Chris Dilorio
Adversarial
1
1
View
organization CMS
Client
1
1
View
organization VeriSign, Inc.
Consultant assistance provider
1
1
View
location USANYS
Inter agency cooperation
1
1
View
person defendant
Party to agreement
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A SEC Investigation (implied) N/A View
N/A N/A SEC decision not to bring charges regarding the resignation/incident. USA View
N/A N/A Smuggling of 3,000 tons of construction materials per day Egypt-Gaza border tunnels View
N/A N/A Release of House Internal Security Committee blacklist Washington D.C. / National View
N/A N/A SEC Complaint Filing N/A View
N/A N/A Epstein's designation as a sex offender New York View
2020-01-01 N/A Target date for NTP (National Transformation Program) objectives. Saudi Arabia View
2018-09-01 N/A SEC lawsuit against Elon Musk regarding 'funding secured' tweet. US View
2018-01-03 Legal case The case of SEC v. Blaszczak, No. 17-CV-3919 (AJN), 2018 WL 301091, was decided, granting a motio... S.D.N.Y. View
2018-01-01 N/A SEC charges against Phillip Frost for pump-and-dump schemes (referenced in email). N/A View
2017-01-01 N/A SEC dropped probe into Apollo month after firm aided Kushner company (referenced in email). N/A View
2016-01-01 N/A Electricity prices increased by weighted average of close to 20%. Saudi Arabia View
2016-01-01 N/A Federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case. Manhattan View
2016-01-01 Legal decision Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue the case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine M... Manhattan View
2014-06-11 N/A Harold Simmons Foundation files with SEC to sell 2.5 million shares. N/A View
2011-06-22 N/A SEC adopted final rules implementing new exemptions from the registration requirements of the Inv... United States View
2010-06-15 Legal ruling A ruling was issued in the case SEC v. Boock in the Southern District of New York. S.D.N.Y. View
2009-02-01 N/A Internal investigation into Snowden's suspicious computer activities. Washington View
2008-07-01 N/A E*TRADE reached a $1 million settlement with the SEC regarding CIP failures. USA View
2008-03-05 N/A Request initiated for certified corporate records from Delaware. Miami / Dover, DE View
2001-01-01 Legal case Legal case citation for SEC v. TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001). N/A View
2001-01-01 Legal case SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001) 2d Cir. View
1998-02-24 N/A Michael Milken consented to entry of final judgment in SEC v. Michael R. Milken et al. U.S. District Court for the... View
1991-03-11 N/A SEC instituted proceeding barring Milken from association with brokers/dealers. N/A View
1990-04-24 N/A Milken consented to judgment concurrently with plea agreement covering criminal violations. U.S. District Court for the... View

056.pdf

This document is a legal response filed on June 26, 2009, by the attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff argues against Epstein's motion to dismiss, specifically contesting his claim that multiple violations of sexual exploitation statutes should be merged into a single count with a single penalty. The response asserts that 18 U.S.C. § 2255 allows for separate civil remedies and damages (minimum $150,000) for each distinct violation of a predicate offense.

Legal pleading (response to defendant's motion to dismiss)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

053.pdf

Legal filing from June 12, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team withdraws seven specific arguments previously made in a Motion to Dismiss regarding the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, including arguments about the plaintiff's minority status and predicate offenses. The defense states it will now rely solely on arguments regarding count merger and subparagraph D.

Legal filing (notice of withdrawal of arguments)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

048.pdf

This document is a legal motion filed on June 9, 2009, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 requesting an extension of time and page limits to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The request is based on an upcoming court hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, in a related case (Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein) which addresses potential breaches of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The document includes certificates of conference and service, listing legal counsel for both parties, including Bruce Reinhart as counsel for a co-defendant named Sarah.

Legal motion
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

041.pdf

This document is a Motion for Limited Appearance filed on June 4, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert D. Critton, Jr. moves for the admission of Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis LLP to appear as co-counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes certificates of service to opposing counsel and a certificate of good standing for Lefkowitz from the District of Columbia court.

Legal motion (motion for limited appearance/pro hac vice) and proposed order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

038.pdf

This document is a Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert C. Josefsberg, representing Plaintiffs Jane Doe 101 and 102, requests to move a hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, because he will be attending his 50th College Reunion in Hanover, New Hampshire. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal teams associated with Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and various plaintiffs in related cases.

Legal motion (motion to reschedule hearing)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

035.pdf

This document is a legal reply filed on May 29, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs argue for the right to proceed anonymously, citing fears of harassment, public humiliation, and Epstein's alleged intent to intimidate victims by exposing their identities. The document lists numerous related cases and provides a service list of attorneys representing various parties, including Bruce Reinhart representing co-defendant Sarah Kellen.

Legal pleading (reply in support of motion to proceed anonymously)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

028-02.pdf

This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.

Legal correspondence / preservation of evidence letter
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

026.pdf

This document is a Motion for Limited Appearance filed on May 21, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:09-CV-80591-KAM). Robert D. Critton, Jr. requests the court to admit Michael D. Shumsky of Kirkland & Ellis LLP as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists legal counsel for both the plaintiff (Jane Doe 101) and the defendant, along with their contact information.

Court filing - motion for limited appearance
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

025.pdf

This document is a legal motion filed on May 21, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida case Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Local counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. requests the court to admit Jay P. Lefkowitz (of Kirkland & Ellis LLP) pro hac vice to represent Jeffrey Epstein. The document outlines Lefkowitz's qualifications, confirms payment of the admission fee, and provides service information for all counsel of record.

Legal motion (federal district court)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

021.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 18, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers requested permission to exceed the standard 20-page limit for their upcoming motion to dismiss, citing complex legal issues regarding the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §2255 and its applicability to the alleged conduct. Plaintiff's counsel agreed to this request via telephone.

Legal motion (motion to exceed page limitation)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

016.pdf

This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on May 11, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys oppose the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously, arguing that Epstein's due process rights to conduct discovery—specifically issuance of third-party subpoenas to medical providers and employers—require the use of the plaintiff's legal name. The filing asserts that the plaintiff's privacy interests do not outweigh the presumption of open judicial proceedings and Epstein's right to defend himself against allegations of sexual exploitation and coercion.

Legal pleading (response in opposition to motion to proceed anonymously and motion to compel/identify plaintiff)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

015.pdf

This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on May 7, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON). Attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike of the law firm Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman formally enter their appearance as counsel for the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing counsel for the Plaintiff (Jane Doe No. 101) and co-counsel for the Defendant.

Legal document (notice of appearance)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

014-01.pdf

This document is a 'Motion to Proceed Anonymously' filed on April 17, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff, represented by Podhurst Orseck, P.A., requests to use a pseudonym because she was sexually abused by Epstein as a minor and wishes to avoid further psychological trauma and public humiliation. The motion notes that Epstein already knows her identity from the related criminal investigation and cites precedents where other victims (Jane Does 1-7, etc.) were granted anonymity.

Legal motion (motion to proceed anonymously and incorporated memorandum of law)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

012.pdf

Legal filing from May 4, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team accepts consolidation of multiple civil cases for depositions but opposes general consolidation for all discovery, arguing that individual cases have distinct facts and defenses that would be confused by a blanket consolidation. The document lists numerous related case numbers (e.g., 08-80119, 08-80381, 09-80469) and requests clarification on the court's previous orders regarding case management.

Legal pleading (response in opposition and motion to clarify)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

011.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 4, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's counsel requests an extension until May 26, 2009, to respond to the complaint filed on April 17, 2009. The reasons cited include the burden of other cases naming Epstein as a defendant and a conflicting state court trial scheduled for mid-May involving the defense counsel.

Legal motion (unopposed motion for extension of time)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

010.pdf

This document is a 'Notice of Striking Docket Entry' filed on May 4, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A., notifies the court that a previous docket entry was filed without a signature and has been re-filed correctly. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing numerous attorneys involved in this case and related cases against Epstein, including Bruce Reinhart (defense), Jack Scarola, and Brad Edwards.

Legal notice / court filing
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

008.pdf

This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 101 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009. The plaintiff agrees to the court's order to consolidate ten separate cases filed by various Jane Does and C.M.A. against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery. The document includes a service list detailing the contact information for attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and the defendant.

Legal filing (response to court order)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

002.pdf

Summons in a Civil Case issued on April 17, 2009, by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-80591 (Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein). The document summons Jeffrey Epstein, noted as being located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, to answer the complaint within 20 days. It lists Epstein's defense counsel (Spicer, Goldberger, Critton) and the plaintiff's attorneys (Josefsberg and Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A.).

Legal summons (civil case)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

001.pdf

This document is a civil complaint filed on April 17, 2009, by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff alleges that in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student, she was recruited and transported to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was sexually assaulted under the guise of giving massages. The complaint asserts causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding coercion, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and transport of child pornography.

Civil complaint and demand for jury trial
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

EFTA00038925.pdf

This document contains a series of invoices and handwritten notes from a house manager (likely named Paula) for Jeffrey Epstein's West Palm Beach property between 2003 and 2005. The records detail hours worked, payments received (including cash from Ghislaine Maxwell), and coordination of maintenance, staff, and guests. Notable details include instructions to schedule repairs when Epstein and Maxwell are not present, ground transport to Jet Aviation, and specific mentions of Maxwell's desk and requirements.

Invoices/timesheets and handwritten correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00038548.pdf

An email dated February 17, 2021, outlining investigative follow-up steps. The sender instructs the recipient to contact Victoria's Secret and FedEx regarding their document retention policies, review images for a redacted individual, and follow up with ALAT (likely Assistant Legal Attaché) to obtain UK travel records for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00038251.pdf

This document is an FBI Child Sex Tourism Travel Advisory and Import Form dated September 2016, notifying the Legal Attaché in Paris of Jeffrey Epstein's travel to France. It details his itinerary aboard private aircraft N212JE, his stay at 22 Avenue Foch, and his status as a convicted Child Sex Offender, noting his scheduled return on October 5, 2016.

Fbi import form (fd-1057) / child sex tourism travel advisory
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00038143.pdf

An internal FBI email dated November 24, 2020, from a Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) in the Crimes Against Children and Human Trafficking Unit. The email requests updates on the Epstein/Maxwell investigation on behalf of FBI Executive Management.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037840.pdf

This document is an email dated September 14, 2019, from the former Chief of the Palm Beach Police Department (name redacted) to an FBI Special Agent (name redacted). The sender, writing from Global Security Advisors, states they have information 'germane' to the investigation of Epstein's coconspirators and requests a phone call to share details the FBI may not be aware of.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037472.pdf

This document is an internal FBI email thread from June 22, 2020, between an SSA in the Crimes Against Children and Human Trafficking Unit (CACHTU) and an SSA in the FBI New York field office. The agents discuss an upcoming conference call with the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein case. Significantly, the emails explicitly mention 'likely charges for indictment and the plan to locate Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), indicating this correspondence occurred shortly before her arrest.

Fbi email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$28.21
2 transactions
Net Flow
-$28.21
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2019-08-15 Paid SEC CMS Monitoring $14.21 Invoice #52339 for security monitoring services... View
2019-07-10 Paid SEC CMS Monitoring $14.00 Outstanding balance on Invoice #51160 reference... View
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search