SEC
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
Administrative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Frank Gaffney Jr.
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Records request |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Street.com
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
TheStreet.Com
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Intelligence asset handler implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jamil Nazarali
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
CME
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Investigator information provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIA
|
Investigative transactional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Drysdale Government Securities
|
Corporate structure |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. forces
|
Advisory training |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Siegel
|
Employment contributor |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Inter agency coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Deceptive association |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Christopher Dilorio
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Chris Dilorio
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
CMS
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
VeriSign, Inc.
|
Consultant assistance provider |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Party to agreement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | SEC Investigation (implied) | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | SEC decision not to bring charges regarding the resignation/incident. | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Smuggling of 3,000 tons of construction materials per day | Egypt-Gaza border tunnels | View |
| N/A | N/A | Release of House Internal Security Committee blacklist | Washington D.C. / National | View |
| N/A | N/A | SEC Complaint Filing | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's designation as a sex offender | New York | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Target date for NTP (National Transformation Program) objectives. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | SEC lawsuit against Elon Musk regarding 'funding secured' tweet. | US | View |
| 2018-01-03 | Legal case | The case of SEC v. Blaszczak, No. 17-CV-3919 (AJN), 2018 WL 301091, was decided, granting a motio... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | SEC charges against Phillip Frost for pump-and-dump schemes (referenced in email). | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | SEC dropped probe into Apollo month after firm aided Kushner company (referenced in email). | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Electricity prices increased by weighted average of close to 20%. | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case. | Manhattan | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Legal decision | Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue the case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine M... | Manhattan | View |
| 2014-06-11 | N/A | Harold Simmons Foundation files with SEC to sell 2.5 million shares. | N/A | View |
| 2011-06-22 | N/A | SEC adopted final rules implementing new exemptions from the registration requirements of the Inv... | United States | View |
| 2010-06-15 | Legal ruling | A ruling was issued in the case SEC v. Boock in the Southern District of New York. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2009-02-01 | N/A | Internal investigation into Snowden's suspicious computer activities. | Washington | View |
| 2008-07-01 | N/A | E*TRADE reached a $1 million settlement with the SEC regarding CIP failures. | USA | View |
| 2008-03-05 | N/A | Request initiated for certified corporate records from Delaware. | Miami / Dover, DE | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case citation for SEC v. TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001). | N/A | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Legal case | SEC v. The Street.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir.2001) | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1998-02-24 | N/A | Michael Milken consented to entry of final judgment in SEC v. Michael R. Milken et al. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 1991-03-11 | N/A | SEC instituted proceeding barring Milken from association with brokers/dealers. | N/A | View |
| 1990-04-24 | N/A | Milken consented to judgment concurrently with plea agreement covering criminal violations. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002351.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a court filing (Document 134) in the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal authorities and articles referenced in the main brief, including a New York Daily News article about federal prosecutors declining to pursue Epstein and Maxwell in 2016, and a New York Times piece by Norman Mailer. It also cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOJ-OGR-00002351(1).jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The page is a table of authorities, citing two newspaper articles, a federal rule of civil procedure, and a constitutional amendment. The articles reference a 1980 piece by Norman Mailer and a 2020 report that Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00002129.jpg
This document is a table of contents for a legal analysis prepared by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the steps of the French extradition procedure and analyzes the potential outcome of an extradition request from the United States for Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on French law and the extradition treaty between the two countries.
DOJ-OGR-00002114.jpg
This document is the Curriculum Vitae of David Perry QC, a prominent UK barrister specializing in extradition law. It outlines his extensive career, including roles as Treasury Counsel and a judge, and highlights his expertise in extradition matters. A key event detailed is his co-authorship of a major 2011 independent review for the UK Home Office on the nation's extradition arrangements, which concluded that the 2003 UK-US treaty was fair and did not need renegotiation.
DOJ-OGR-00002006.jpg
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William Julié (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001809.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Government is failing to meet discovery obligations, specifically regarding 28 boxes of material from Florida and files from Georgia, and that the proposed timeline impairs Maxwell's ability to prepare for the July 2021 trial. The text highlights concerns about witness statements, the age of the claims (26 years), and the difficulty of securing out-of-country testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00030512.jpg
A letter from attorney Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek dated February 17, 2006. Fronstin submits evidence attempting to discredit a witness/accuser (whose name is redacted) by documenting thefts at Victoria Secret and providing a receipt for a sex toy purchase to demonstrate the individual was over 18 and acting voluntarily. The letter also alleges that Detective Recarey is spreading misinformation regarding the Epstein investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019434.jpg
This legal document, dated September 24, 2020, argues that the government strategically chose not to intervene to prevent the unsealing of Ms. Maxwell's depositions. The filing suggests this inaction allows the government to later claim any violation of a prior ruling was harmless. It supports its argument by citing legal precedents, such as 'Louis Vuitton' and 'SEC v. Boock', which warn of the dangers for defendants who waive their Fifth Amendment rights during civil discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00009062.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that the court should strike all filings made by 'Juror No. 50.' The argument posits that the juror, as a non-party, lacks standing and that the filings are an improper attempt at discovery, not 'judicial documents' entitled to public access. Alternatively, it requests that the juror's filings remain sealed pending the outcome of Ms. Maxwell's motion for a new trial, which is based on the same juror's alleged dishonesty during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00031289.jpg
This document, page 16 of 28 from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, is a financial record listing contributions from various individuals and organizations. The contributions range from $5,000 to $7,576 and are associated with donors from various industries including business, law, real estate, and security across the United States. The document is part of a public records request dated May 7, 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00031279.jpg
This document is a printout from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated December 7, 2002, listing campaign contributions to Democratic Governor-elect Bill Richardson. It explicitly lists Jeffrey E. Epstein as a donor of $50,000, identifying him as an investor from Stanley (New Mexico). The document also notes that contributions included in-kind donations such as the use of airplanes for the campaign.
DOJ-OGR-00031236.jpg
This document is a printout from the Albuquerque Tribune Online dated December 7, 2002, listing campaign contributions to Governor-elect Bill Richardson. It explicitly lists a $50,000 donation from Jeffrey E. Epstein, identifying him as an 'Investor' based in 'Stanley' (New Mexico). The document also notes that donations included in-kind services such as the use of airplanes for the campaign.
DOJ-OGR-00019652.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal brief (likely a reply brief) filed on October 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Case 20-3061). It argues that the appellate court has jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to review Judge Nathan's order regarding a criminal protective order. The text notes that Maxwell is scheduled for trial in July 2021 and explicitly seeks permission to share specific information (which is redacted in the text) with Judge Preska and the appellate court under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00003039.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated April 16, 2021, discussing legal precedents concerning the modification of protective orders in the face of a grand jury subpoena. It cites several Second Circuit cases, including Martindell and Davis, to argue that a grand jury's broad investigative powers often outweigh a party's reliance on a protective order, particularly for pre-existing documents. The text emphasizes that the need for a grand jury to gather evidence in a criminal investigation is a powerful reason to permit modification of such orders.
DOJ-OGR-00002943.jpg
This document is page 9 of 239 from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations alphabetically from 'Miller v. Pate' to 'SEC v. TheStreet.com'. Each entry includes the case name, its legal reporter citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
DOJ-OGR-00020048.jpg
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William Julié, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00002875.jpg
This legal document, dated March 29, 2021, is a filing from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It clarifies the role of the FBI New York Office in an investigation conducted by the FBI Florida Office, stating that the New York office provided only 'ancillary support' by interviewing four witnesses between 2007 and 2008. The document asserts that this assistance did not make the New York office part of the prosecution team and that such inter-office cooperation is common.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.jpg
This document is a March 2017 legal newsletter from Sadis Goldberg LLP. It features two main articles: one by Samuel J. Lieberman discussing a Supreme Court ruling (Salman v. U.S.) that makes it easier to prosecute insider trading involving gifts of information to family/friends, and another by Daniel G. Viola discussing the impact of the new Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule on financial advisers. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019771.jpg
This document is page 283 from a book (indicated by the filename 'Epst_...' likely referring to author Edward Jay Epstein) titled 'Snowden's Choices,' bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text analyzes Edward Snowden's motivations, characterizing him as a calculating defector who used stolen NSA secrets on thumb drives as 'bait' or currency to secure protection from Chinese and Russian intelligence services. It details his CIA training at Fort Peary and argues that his choice of Russia contradicts a desire for civil liberties, suggesting his primary goal was escaping American retribution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019733.jpg
This document appears to be page 245 from a book titled 'A Single Point of Failure', seemingly included in a House Oversight production related to an Epstein investigation (indicated by the 'Epst' filename prefix). The text details the geopolitical maneuvering surrounding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Russia in June 2013, including tracking by the NSA, comments by President Obama, and intelligence strategies regarding 'false flag' operations and obscuring success. It discusses the involvement of US, Chinese, and Russian intelligence services.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019701.jpg
This is page 213 of a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename 'Epst' and ISBN) marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text details the NSA's reliance on private contractors/ex-hackers for system administration and the security vulnerabilities created by moving sensitive data to networks to avoid 'stove-piping,' citing General Hayden and FBI Director Mueller. It lists major contractors including Booz Allen Hamilton and Microsoft who managed classified systems by 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687.jpg
This document is a page (p. 199) from a book, likely titled 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' (based on the filename ISBN), which was included in a House Oversight Committee document production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687). The text provides a historical overview of the rise of the National Security Agency (NSA), detailing its origins in WWII cryptography (breaking Enigma and Purple ciphers), its formal establishment by President Truman in 1952, and its dual mission of protecting US communications while intercepting foreign intelligence during the Cold War. The footer indicates the file was processed or printed on September 30, 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019654.jpg
This document appears to be page 166 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets', likely included in a House Oversight production file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019654). The text details Edward Snowden's time in the Moscow airport transit zone, the control exerted over him by the Russian FSB, and commentary from Russian officials and former KGB agents asserting that Snowden likely shared US intelligence with Russia. While the file name includes 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein), the text content is exclusively about the Snowden intelligence leak.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Paid | SEC | CMS Monitoring | $14.21 | Invoice #52339 for security monitoring services... | View |
| 2019-07-10 | Paid | SEC | CMS Monitoring | $14.00 | Outstanding balance on Invoice #51160 reference... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity