| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Trafficker victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Defendant victim |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Victim accused |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Recruiter victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness-3
|
Witness victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness-4
|
Witness victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-5
|
Recruitment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-6
|
Recruitment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Groomer victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
his victims and other young females
|
Recruiter recruited |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Witness accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Victim prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Groomer recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified girls under 18
|
Recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Alleged victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Recruitment and sexual exploitation | Epstein and MAXWELL recruited Minor Victim-4 to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach... | Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | Crime | MAXWELL and Epstein invited Minor Victim-4, who was under 18, to travel from Florida to a place o... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Epstein and MAXWELL both encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-4 to recruit other girls to engage i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Denial of motion to compel immediate disclosure of Minor Victim-4's prior statements. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anticipated trial where evidence regarding victims and terms like 'rape' will be used. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Minor Victim-4 | Court | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | MAXWELL and Epstein invited Minor Victim-4, then under 18, to travel from Florida to another loca... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Meeting | MAXWELL met Minor Victim-4 at Epstein's Palm Beach Residence when Minor Victim-4 was approximatel... | Epstein's Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Confirmatory identification procedure | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Deposition | Minor Victim-4 was deposed in a civil lawsuit where she stated the defendant scheduled her massag... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where the Government is requesting special measures for how minor victims and witnesses a... | court | View |
| N/A | Flight | The defendant sent gifts from New York to Florida for Minor Victim-4. | From New York to Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | The defendant encouraged Minor Victim-4 to bring other young females to massage Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Minor Victim-4 was recruited to provide Epstein with sexualized massages. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Minor Victim-4 was interviewed in connection with the USAO-SDFL's investigation. The interview fo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | An upcoming trial where the Government expects four Minor Victims to testify. The jury will hear ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An investigation conducted by the USAO-SDFL, during which Minor Victim-4 was interviewed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Photo identification | Minor Victim-4 was shown a photo book with 20 photos and identified a photo of the defendant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Minor Victim-4 was interviewed by the FBI and, according to the defense, did not implicate the de... | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | N/A | USAO-SDFL Investigation | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-01 | N/A | Government meetings including review of a photo book with 20 photos. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-01-31 | Interviews | Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end o... | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Multiple Government meetings with Minor Victim-4. | Unknown | View |
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on May 25, 2021, likely by the prosecution. It argues that the 'S2 Indictment' was filed timely and not delayed for strategic reasons, explaining that interviews with 'Minor Victim-4' were delayed until early 2021 due to COVID-19 travel constraints. The text refutes the defendant's motion to dismiss based on pre-indictment delay.
This document is page 18 of a Government filing (Document 295) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on May 25, 2021. The Government argues that Maxwell's motion to dismiss charges based on pre-indictment delay should be denied because she failed to prove prejudice or improper tactical motives by the prosecution. The text specifically addresses the 'S2 Indictment,' noting that new charges involving 'Minor Victim-4' were added based on new evidence unavailable previously, refuting claims of bad faith delay.
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a defendant's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of an indictment. The document asserts that the charges, which involve the sexual abuse of a minor, are timely filed under the statute of limitations (18 U.S.C. § 3283) because the victim is still alive. It also states that the court has previously rejected the defendant's legal arguments regarding the applicability of the statute and its retroactivity.
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 295) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines the arguments to be made in the filing, which address several motions from the defendant, including arguments related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, double jeopardy, pre-trial delay, and the disclosure of statements from 'Minor Victim-4'.
This document is page 71 of a court filing (Document 397) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a legal argument by the prosecution opposing a defense motion to suppress an identification made by Minor Victim-4. The text argues that the victim's identification is reliable because she had multiple personal interactions with the defendant between 2001 and 2004, and concludes by asking the court to deny the defense's motion.
This legal document argues that the photo identification of a defendant by 'Minor Victim-4' was valid and not suggestive. It establishes that the victim had prior personal knowledge of the defendant from interactions between 2001 and 2004, and that the photo identification procedure was conducted cautiously. The document refutes the defense's claim that the defendant's photo was unduly suggestive because it looked like a 'mug shot' or was different from the others.
This document is a Preliminary Statement from a Government memorandum filed on October 29, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against thirteen motions in limine filed by the defense, asserting the admissibility of expert testimony, evidence regarding Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, co-conspirator statements, and the use of the terms 'victim' and 'rape' during trial. The Government also notes it will not introduce evidence of the defendant's flight or false statements in its case-in-chief unless the defense opens the door.
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed by the prosecution ('Government') arguing against the defense's desire to introduce evidence related to a past charging decision from a Florida investigation. The prosecution contends this evidence is irrelevant, cumulative, and would invite the jury to speculate, creating a 'bizarre spectacle' that distracts from the actual evidence of the current trial. The document cites case law to support its position that the jury should only consider the evidence presented in this specific case, not the prosecutorial decisions made in other jurisdictions.
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against the defense's attempts to introduce certain evidence. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein is irrelevant to the current case and that the fact the defendant was not charged by the USAO-SDFL after a Florida investigation is not admissible to challenge the credibility of Minor Victim-4. The document suggests that introducing these elements would mislead the jury and open the door to rebuttal from the government about the circumstances of the prior investigation.
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) discusses the court's ruling on the anonymity of 'Minor Victim-4' during trial. The court rejects the defense's argument that using the victim's real name is necessary for impeachment or to address allegations of suborning perjury. The ruling allows the defense to use the victim's first name and show unredacted exhibits to the jury, but prohibits saying the victim's last name out loud in court.
This document is page 15 of a Government filing dated October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It discusses the Government's proposal to protect the identities of Minor Victims 1, 3, 4, and 6 through the use of pseudonyms or first names only during testimony. The text explicitly links the 'intimate details of childhood sexual abuse' to both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein.
This is page 14 of a court filing (Document 383) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concerns a Government motion requesting that 'Minor Victim-4' be allowed to testify using only her first name to minimize loss of privacy and dignity, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). The document also introduces a section regarding 'Minor Victim-6', but the subsequent text is heavily redacted.
This is page 13 of a legal filing (Document 383) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text discusses 'Minor Victim-4,' arguing that the defense's attempts to attack her credibility based on statements made to the USAO-SDFL are irrelevant to her privacy interests regarding her upcoming testimony. Large portions of the page are redacted.
This document is the table of contents for a legal motion filed by the government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The motion outlines arguments to protect the privacy of minor victims by allowing testimony under pseudonyms and sealing exhibits. It also seeks to preclude the defense from introducing what the government deems irrelevant evidence and improper arguments, including prior investigations of the defendant and the government's alleged motives.
This document is page 17 of 54 from a court filing (Document 380) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the sealing of exhibits containing the names or last names of specific minor victims (Minor Victim-1, 3, 4, 6) and Witness-1 to prevent harassment and protect privacy, citing various legal precedents. A footnote also argues that courtroom sketch artists should be precluded from drawing the faces of victims.
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a motion from the Government requesting protective measures for witnesses and minor victims in a criminal case. The Government asks the Court to allow several witnesses to testify using pseudonyms or first names only to protect the identities of the minor victims they are testifying about. The motion also requests that a non-testifying minor victim be referred to by her first name only in open court.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 380 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 29, 2021. In it, the Government requests that the Court implement protective measures for several minor victims and related witnesses, such as using pseudonyms or first names only during trial and sealing exhibits containing their full names. The filing argues that these measures are necessary to protect the victims from harassment and are legally permissible limitations on the defendant's Confrontation Clause rights.
This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government requests that the Court allow certain minor victim witnesses to testify under pseudonyms or first names to protect their privacy during the upcoming trial, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The motion details the expected testimony of 'Minor Victim-4' regarding her recruitment by 'Minor Victim-5' and her subsequent recruitment of 'Minor Victim-6'.
This legal filing details the government's interactions with Minor Victim-4, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) between 2001 and 2004. It highlights that the defendant personally paid the victim following sexual encounters with Epstein and outlines the victim's interviews with the FBI in 2007 and prosecutors in 2020 and 2021. The document also mentions a photo identification procedure conducted in June 2021.
This document is a page from a Government legal filing (dated Oct 29, 2021) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government rebuts defense accusations regarding discovery violations, stating they provided co-conspirator statements 'unusually early' (seven weeks before trial). Additionally, the Government argues against suppressing the identification of the defendant by 'Minor Victim-4,' asserting that the victim knew the defendant personally for decades.
This document is the Table of Contents (page 2 of the brief, page 3 of the PDF) for a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines legal arguments by the Government opposing Defense motions, specifically concerning the identification of the defendant by 'Minor Victim-4', the admission of government exhibits, and the use of the terms 'Victims' and 'Rape' during the trial.
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2021, details the Government's investigative actions concerning "Minor Victim-4" and the "defendant." It outlines a series of interviews with Minor Victim-4, conducted via video and in-person between summer 2020 and January 2021, alongside further investigative steps. The document asserts that a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) was timely presented to a grand jury in late March, refuting the defense's claims of intentional delay or that the indictment acknowledges the strength of pretrial motions.
This document is a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 9, 2021, regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that the timing of a superseding indictment (S2) was based on new evidence—specifically involving 'Minor Victim-4'—rather than improper motives, and opposes any delay to the trial scheduled for July 2021. The letter also asserts that the new charges reinforce the Court's previous decisions to deny bail to Maxwell.
This document is page 20 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Seven, a perjury charge against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging she gave false testimony during a deposition on April 22, 2016. The indictment specifically quotes her denial of any knowledge regarding Jeffrey Epstein's alleged scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-01-01 | Received | The Defendant (Gh... | Minor Victim-4 | $0.00 | Payment following sexual encounters with Epstein. | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Received | Epstein's employe... | Minor Victim-4 | $0.00 | Gifts, including lingerie, sent from Manhattan ... | View |
Interview regarding abuse; government argues it is a 'rough transcript' with errors.
Messages left by Minor Victim-4, referenced in message pads seized from Epstein’s Palm Beach residence.
Messages left by Minor Victim-4, referenced in message pads seized from Epstein’s Palm Beach residence.
Phone calls made by an Epstein employee to Minor Victim-4, reflected in phone records.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Phone calls made by an Epstein employee to Minor Victim-4, reflected in phone records.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
The defendant called Minor Victim-4 to schedule massage appointments with Epstein.
The S2 Indictment describes conversations between the defendant and Minor Victim-4 related to the trafficking scheme.
Epstein's employees, including MAXWELL, called Minor Victim-4 from New York to schedule appointments for her to massage Epstein.
Epstein's employees, including Maxwell, sent gifts such as lingerie from an address in the Southern District of New York to Minor Victim-4's residence.
Two preliminary interviews conducted via video due to COVID-19 constraints.
Offer to assist obtaining a passport for travel (declined).
The Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
The Government conducted multiple in-person interviews with Minor Victim-4, concluding near the end of January 2021.
Minor Victim-4 did not agree to be interviewed by the Government until July 2020.
Minor Victim-4 did not agree to be interviewed by the Government until July 2020.
The Government conducted two preliminary interviews with Minor Victim-4 via video teleconference in the summer of 2020.
The Government conducted two preliminary interviews with Minor Victim-4 via video teleconference in the summer of 2020.
Interview regarding interactions with Epstein and description of the defendant.
Call to schedule massage appointment.
Call to schedule massage appointment.
In or about April and May of 2004, another employee of Epstein's called Minor Victim-4 to schedule appointments.
Package sent from Manhattan to Florida.
Epstein caused a package to be sent by Federal Express from Manhattan to Minor Victim-4 in Florida in or about October of 2002.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity