Manhattan
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00022733.tif
This document appears to be an index or glossary of terms, likely from a larger report or transcript, with corresponding page references. It lists various words and names, including 'London', 'Madison', 'Madrigal', and 'Lynn', along with their occurrences in the source material. The document also features the logo for MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES.
DOJ-OGR-00022694.tif
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview involving Ghislaine Maxwell, with questions posed by Todd Blanche and David Markus, and Diego Pestana. The discussion covers Maxwell's attendance at Chelsea Clinton's wedding with her then-boyfriend Ted Waitt, her visits to the White House with Jeffrey Epstein, her friendships with President Clinton and Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, and whether she met Piers Morgan and JFK Jr. Maxwell denies Epstein was at Chelsea Clinton's wedding and expresses uncertainty or lack of knowledge regarding some questions related to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00022630.tif
This document appears to be a page from an index or glossary, listing terms alphabetically from 'living' to 'marks' with corresponding page numbers. It includes names like Madison, Madrigal, Lou, Lynn, and Mann, as well as locations like London and Manhattan. The footer indicates it is from 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' and has a document number 'DOJ-OGR-00022630'.
DOJ-OGR-00022544.tif
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition where Ghislaine Maxwell is being questioned by Todd Blanche and Diego Pestana. The conversation revolves around whether Maxwell was friends with Piers Morgan, to which she replies that she met him at an event in Manhattan around 2012 or 2013 and had a nice conversation, stating she 'liked him' but doesn't recall if they had met before or if they were friends.
DOJ-OGR-00008513.jpg
This document is Instruction No. 40 regarding 'Venue' from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 17, 2021. It instructs the jury that the Government must prove, by a 'preponderance of the evidence,' that an act related to each charged crime occurred within the Southern District of New York, which includes several specified counties. The document clarifies that if the Government fails to meet this burden of proof for any specific charge, the jury must acquit the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, on that charge.
DOJ-OGR-00008507.jpg
This legal document, part of an indictment, details overt acts related to a criminal case against Epstein and Maxwell. It outlines specific instances between 1994 and 2004 where they allegedly conspired to recruit and sexually abuse several minors, identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn, in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The document describes methods of enticement, such as arranging travel and providing cash payments, and alleges that one victim, Carolyn, was also encouraged to recruit other girls.
DOJ-OGR-00001913.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, in which the government argues against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecutor highlights the defendant's unexplained wealth, lack of community ties, and willingness to live in hiding as flight risks. The government finds it 'extremely surprising' that the defendant has proposed a bail package with no security, has refused to provide financial details about herself or her spouse, and proposes to live in a transient luxury hotel in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00001871.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues against the defense's position that a co-conspirator committing similar crimes without the defendant constitutes exculpatory evidence under Brady. The Government cites multiple Second Circuit precedents to establish that evidence of a defendant's non-participation in other criminal events or lawful conduct on other occasions is irrelevant to disproving specific charged crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that recent public statements by the government have been prejudicial to her right to a fair trial. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss on July 2, 2020, following Maxwell's arrest, quoting her statements from the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of improper commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00001240.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (dated Dec 28, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text outlines proposed conditions including home detention, renunciation of foreign citizenship, and asset monitoring by a retired judge and former US Attorney. It compares her situation to the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, noting that he was granted bail despite being a foreign citizen arrested while attempting to leave the country on serious sexual assault charges, whereas Maxwell faces 26-year-old claims.
DOJ-OGR-00001040.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021, where a government representative argues against granting bail to a defendant. The government contends the defendant is a flight risk due to her unexplained wealth, lack of ties, and willingness to hide, pointing out that she has refused to provide financial details and has proposed an unstable living arrangement of staying indefinitely at a luxury hotel in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00000802.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490) detailing Jeffrey Epstein's classification as a Level III sex offender in New York. It highlights a hearing (cited as 2011 in the footnote but 2018 in the text body) where Judge Ruth Pickholz was 'shocked' that Assistant DA Jennifer Gaffney joined Epstein's defense in arguing to reduce his offender status. The Judge denied the application, maintaining his requirement to report to police every 90 days.
DOJ-OGR-00000800.jpg
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000789.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, details arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's bail. It outlines the government's allegations that Epstein's employees facilitated the trafficking of minors to his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach. The document also presents the defense counsel's counterarguments, asserting that Epstein is not a flight risk due to his history of returning to the U.S. after extensive travel and his willingness to provide full financial disclosure to the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00000787.jpg
This legal document outlines fourteen bail conditions proposed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team. The conditions include home detention in his Manhattan residence (valued at $77 million), electronic monitoring, and a substantial bond secured by his residence, private jet, his brother Mark's home, and his friend David Mitchell's investments. The proposal aims to guarantee Epstein's court appearance and mitigate any perceived danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000563.jpg
This document is page 53 of a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, concerning the detention hearing of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A defense attorney argues to the Judge that specific financial details ('values and accounts') and evidence of seizures should remain confidential to ensure Epstein's right to a fair and impartial jury in Manhattan, citing the enormous publicity surrounding the case. The speaker mentions opposing counsel Mr. Rossmiller at the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00000488.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 18, 2019, alleges that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to tamper with witnesses. The Government contends that shortly after the Miami Herald published an exposé on his 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein paid $100,000 and $250,000 respectively to 'Individual I' and 'Individual II', both described as potential co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes. The payments are presented as evidence of an attempt to influence potential witnesses in his ongoing case.
DOJ-OGR-00000485.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues for the detention of Mr. Epstein. It cites a Pretrial Services report that deems him a flight risk and a danger to the community, referencing his current sex trafficking charges, a 2008 conviction for prostitution-related felonies, and his status as a registered sex offender. The Government alleges Epstein is a "serial sexual predator" who created a vast network to exploit minors, and the document includes a footnote quoting Epstein distinguishing himself as an "offender" rather than a "predator."
DOJ-OGR-00000442.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution argues for the continued pre-trial detention of the defendant, citing the recent discovery of over $70,000 in cash, 48 loose diamonds, and a large diamond ring in a safe at the defendant's Manhattan residence. The government contends these assets demonstrate the defendant has the capability to flee the jurisdiction and should therefore not be released.
DOJ-OGR-00000434.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues that Epstein's finances are too complex to meet the court's 5pm deadline for a financial statement, citing his detention as an impediment. It proposes that the court accept the initial disclosure and, as a condition for granting bail, order a comprehensive forensic accounting of his finances to be conducted by Joel Podgor of the firm Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00000411.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing dated July 16, 2019, details allegations from an indictment against a defendant for sexual abuse of underage girls. The crimes allegedly occurred at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida, and involved facilitation by employees and associates. The document argues that the defendant, being 'extraordinarily wealthy' with multiple international residences and two private jets, is a significant flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000333.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Government filing to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein (the defendant). It highlights his extreme flight risk due to his sophisticated financial network, international residences (Paris, USVI), and recent travel history (over 20 international flights since 2018). The document also notes that since the indictment was unsealed, more victims have come forward and search warrants executed at his Manhattan home yielded a significant volume of nude photographs of young women and girls.
DOJ-OGR-00000329.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 12, 2019, arguing against Jeffrey Epstein's motion for pretrial release. The government portrays Epstein as an unrepentant serial sexual predator who poses a significant flight risk due to his vast wealth and the likelihood of a life sentence. The letter cites substantial evidence, including photographs found in his mansion and a history of witness manipulation, to support its request for continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000277.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 6) dated July 11, 2019, outlining proposed bail conditions for Jeffrey Epstein. It details a substantial bond package secured by his $77 million Manhattan home, his private jet, and properties owned by his brother Mark Epstein and friend David Mitchell. The document also notes that Epstein sold a second private jet in June 2019 and proposes strict house arrest conditions including 24/7 monitoring by trustees.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity