Manhattan

Location
Mentions
761
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
344
Also known as:
Manhattan, New York City Manhattan, NY Manhattan, New York Lower Manhattan Downtown Manhattan Manhattanite Manhattan’s Upper East Side 71st Street between Fifth and Madison Avenues, Manhattan Lower East Side, Manhattan Sutton Place, Manhattan Manhattan home East 65th Street, Manhattan, New York Upper East Side of Manhattan Midtown Manhattan New York City (implied by Manhattan) Pearl Street, Manhattan Northern Manhattan Manhattan residence Epstein's Manhattan residence Manhattan residence / NYC house Manhattan apartment 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY (Epstein's Manhattan Townhouse) Manhattan house 500 Pearl St. (Manhattan) Epstein's 71st St House (Manhattan) Manhattan house (Epstein property) MCC Manhattan Manhattan mansion (Epstein's residence) Metropolitan Correctional Center (Manhattan) Manhattan apartment / New York Mansion

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00010706.jpg

This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Document 675) from June 2022 arguing for the importance of allowing victims to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. It quotes Victim Impact Statements from two survivors, 'Sarah' (from England) and 'Elizabeth' (from Philadelphia), who describe the therapeutic value of the trial and the validation of their trauma after decades of silence. The document asserts that public victim statements serve the broader interest of building confidence in the justice system regarding the Maxwell conspiracy.

Court filing (legal brief/memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010137.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists the publications of Stephen Gillers. The list includes books and articles he authored, co-edited, or contributed to between 1973 and 2011. The publications cover various legal topics, including the FBI, government secrecy, legal ethics, and law practice, and involve collaborations with several other editors and publishers.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009867.jpg

This Reuters news article, dated January 5, 2022, reports on the jury deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex abuse trial. A juror, Scotty David, revealed that some jurors initially doubted the credibility of two accusers, Jane and Carolyn. David explained that he shared his own experience of childhood sexual abuse to help the other jurors understand the nature of memory and trauma, which ultimately swayed them and led to a unanimous guilty verdict on December 29, 2021.

News article
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009795.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) recording the voir dire process. The Court is questioning Juror No. 50, a 35-year-old Manhattan resident who works as an executive assistant in finance and has held that role since graduating college in 2008.

Court transcript (voir dire / jury selection)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009717.jpg

This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022. It contains a screenshot of the Twitter profile for 'Scotty David' (Juror No. 50), showing tweets from Annie Farmer and Lucia Osborne-Crowley discussing the juror's disclosure of his own trauma during an exclusive interview. The text below the image notes that Juror No. 50 changed his handle to '@NycSsddd' and attempted to delete a tweet sent to Ms. Farmer shortly after sending it.

Court filing / legal exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00003182.jpg

This legal document outlines the aftermath of a November 2018 Miami Herald report concerning Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It details a February 2019 court ruling that found the government violated victims' rights, leading to the recusal of the U.S. Attorney's Office. The document then describes Epstein's subsequent federal indictment and arrest in New York in July 2019, and the resignation of government official Acosta following a press conference where he defended his role in the original NPA.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00003009.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the admissibility of certain evidence in the case against Epstein. It cites multiple legal precedents establishing that proof of lawful conduct on some occasions is irrelevant to disproving a specific criminal charge. The document applies this to the Epstein case, asserting that a prior investigation's findings about his conduct in the 2000s are irrelevant to the current charges from 1994-1997, and notes that two key victims were only interviewed for the first time in late 2019.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025478.jpg

This document is an email chain from December 6, 2019, within the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) discussing a media inquiry from the NY Daily News. The inquiry focuses on the conditions and staff morale at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The reporter's questions cover topics such as funding for facility improvements, staffing levels, policy changes, and officer attrition rates, suggesting an investigation into systemic issues at the facility.

Email
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014624.jpg

This legal document outlines specific actions taken between 2001 and 2004 as part of a conspiracy charge. It details how Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other employees sent gifts (including lingerie) to a woman named Carolyn and repeatedly called her to schedule massages for Epstein. The document concludes with a legal clarification that for a conspiracy conviction, it is sufficient to prove that any member of the conspiracy committed an overt act, not necessarily the defendant (Ms. Maxwell) herself.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011761.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Visoski. Visoski describes visiting Mr. Epstein's office at Madison Avenue and 51st Street in Manhattan approximately once a week between 1994 and 2004. The primary purpose of these visits was to submit expense reports and receive reimbursement checks, though the witness also spoke with other employees about travel plans and provided a physical description of the small office.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011757.jpg

This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski identifies Juan Alessi and Janusz as house managers for Mr. Epstein in Palm Beach between 1994 and 2004. The witness also states they frequently visited Epstein's Manhattan residence at 9 East 71st Street to handle luggage before flights.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011751.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies about their employment with "Mr. Epstein," listing numerous residences they visited, including properties in Manhattan, Palm Beach, New Mexico, Paris, and two islands in St. Thomas. The witness recalls their first visit to the Palm Beach residence was in 1991 and states they visited that location frequently to handle luggage.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002830.jpg

This legal document, page 9 of a court filing dated March 24, 2021, details a court's analysis of a dispute between the defendant, Schulte, and the Government over the proper 'relevant community' for jury selection. The court sides with the Government, ruling that the appropriate jury pool is the White Plains master wheel, which draws from all counties in the Southern District, rather than just those that supply jurors to Manhattan where the trial is to be held. This decision is based on legal precedent and the statutory composition of the judicial district.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017395.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies about working for Ms. Maxwell in the 2000s, describing visits to her Manhattan brownstone to handle luggage, sign expense reports, and install a home theater on the sixth floor. The witness also provides a layout description of the brownstone's lower levels.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025473.jpg

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons email thread from December 6, 2019, coordinating a response to a New York Daily News inquiry. The reporter asked detailed questions about low morale, funding, hiring surges, and staff attrition at MCC Manhattan following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and the subsequent charges against guards for falsifying documents. The proposed responses from the BOP are almost entirely redacted under deliberative process privileges.

Email thread / government record (foia)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025469.jpg

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email chain from December 6, 2019, discussing a media inquiry from the NY Daily News. A reporter is writing a story about staff morale and conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following the Epstein case and is requesting a response by the close of business for a story set to run over the weekend. The email forwards the reporter's query and an updated response for review.

Email
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025465.jpg

This document is an email chain from December 6, 2019, among Bureau of Prisons personnel discussing a media inquiry from the NY Daily News. The inquiry concerns a story about morale and conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York following the Jeffrey Epstein case. The reporter has already spoken with an AFGE union official and a defense attorney and is requesting a response by the end of the day.

Email
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00025444.jpg

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email chain dated December 6, 2019, coordinating a response to a media inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter asks six specific questions regarding facility conditions, staff morale, hiring practices, and policy changes at MCC New York following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and subsequent charges against guards for falsifying documents. The proposed responses to these questions are entirely redacted under exemption (b)(5).

Email chain / media inquiry
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002861.jpg

This document is page 19 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It details overt acts including Epstein sending a package via FedEx to Minor Victim-4 in Florida in 2002, and Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or employees calling the victim between 2001 and 2004 to schedule massages. The page also introduces Count Six, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor between 2001 and 2004.

Court filing (indictment)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002836.jpg

This legal document is a portion of a brief arguing against a defendant named Schulte's challenge to the jury selection process. The argument asserts that Schulte fails to prove 'systematic exclusion' because the alleged underrepresentation of minority jurors was due to external factors, not the jury selection system itself, citing multiple legal precedents. Schulte's specific claim that the Government sought an indictment in White Plains to avoid the more diverse jury pool of Manhattan is presented as the core of his foreclosed allegation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002825.jpg

This document is page 4 of a legal filing dated March 26, 2021, likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeline and context of jury selection in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It outlines the procedural mechanics of the 'Jury Plan,' detailing how master jury wheels are constructed from voter registration lists in specific NY counties (Manhattan, Bronx, Westchester, etc.) to ensure proportionate representation. A footnote clarifies qualification criteria for jurors, including English proficiency, citizenship, and exemptions for hardship or occupation.

Legal filing / court order (page 4 of 20)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014464.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York, citing evidence related to several counts, including trips to Manhattan by individuals named Jane and Annie, and Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule 'sexualized massages' in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005212.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's ability to receive a fair trial has been compromised by extensive negative publicity. The publicity stems from Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 case, the subsequent investigation by the Department of Justice's OPR, and the resignation of Alex Acosta. The document further contends that the trial's location in New York, a venue for other high-profile sex abuse cases involving figures like Andrew Cuomo, Harvey Weinstein, and R. Kelly, contributes to a biased environment.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002725.jpg

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is a request for the production of documents related to defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It seeks all communications concerning the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, including those between various government agencies and Epstein's lawyers. The request also demands communications from meetings in 2016 and 2018 where attorneys for Epstein's victims urged the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to launch a criminal investigation into both Epstein and Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity