Manhattan
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00021623.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement from an individual identified as M6SQmaxS1, written for a legal proceeding. The 48-year-old speaker describes attending Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in Manhattan and reflects on how their life was derailed for over two decades after meeting Maxwell, who they state "fed me to Jeffrey Epstein."
DOJ-OGR-00021208.jpg
This document provides a background on Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his career path from a teacher to a financier at Bear Stearns, his immense and mysterious wealth, and his various properties. It then focuses on the high-profile legal team he assembled to defend against allegations of sexual misconduct in Florida, including attorneys Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, and Gerald Lefcourt. The text also notes a conflict of interest that arose when Epstein hired Jack Goldberger, whose law partner was married to the Assistant State Attorney on the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019492.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that her right to a fair trial has been prejudiced by public statements made by the prosecution. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss following Maxwell's July 2, 2020 arrest, quoting her statements to the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of prejudicial commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00019086.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers recounts their personal history, stating they met Jeffrey Epstein while living near Columbus, Ohio, then lived in Manhattan for a year before moving to West Palm Beach in 1994. The testimony also establishes that Epstein maintained residences in both New York and Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00017085.jpg
This document is a single page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues that crimes took place within the jurisdiction of the Southern District of New York, citing trips to Manhattan by victims 'Jane' and 'Annie,' packages sent from Manhattan, and phone calls made by Maxwell to 'Carolyn' to schedule sexualized massages.
DOJ-OGR-00016675.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The witness states they work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on the New York/New Jersey HIDTA task force in Manhattan. Aznaran explains that CBP is a federal law enforcement agency formed from two legacy agencies, the INS and U.S. Customs Service, and that they have been employed there since July 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00016575.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It shows the conclusion of the cross-examination of a witness, Espinosa, who confirms working at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan office but not his homes. Following this, the defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, calls the next witness, Raghu Sud, to the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00016523.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness named Espinosa identifies Ghislaine Maxwell in the courtroom and testifies about her six-year employment with Jeffrey Epstein's company. Espinosa states she primarily worked at the office located at 457 Madison in Manhattan, but occasionally worked at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence toward the end of her employment, totaling about one or two weeks over six years. She explicitly denies ever working out of Epstein's Manhattan residence.
DOJ-OGR-00016519.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Espinosa describes a multi-stage job interview process. The witness recounts a unique interview with Ghislaine Maxwell that took place in a limousine driving around Manhattan. Following that, Espinosa had a final interview with Jeffrey Epstein, who made the ultimate decision to offer the witness a job the next day.
DOJ-OGR-00009189.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a Reuters article printed on January 26, 2022. It details the controversy surrounding juror 'Scotty David' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who revealed in an interview that he was a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he may not have disclosed during jury selection (voir dire). The U.S. Attorney's office wrote to Judge Alison Nathan requesting an inquiry into his service, potentially threatening the verdict. The text also details testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding payments from Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009188.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) containing a printout of a Reuters article dated January 5, 2022. The article details how juror Scotty David swayed fellow jurors during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial by sharing his own history of childhood sexual abuse to validate the imperfect memories of accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn.' The document highlights the internal deliberations of the jury that led to Maxwell's conviction on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00009104.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. It captures the voir dire examination of Juror No. 50, where the court questions the prospective juror about their age (35), residence (Manhattan), education (bachelor's in finance), and employment history as an executive assistant in finance.
DOJ-OGR-00009026.jpg
This document is a court filing (Page 25 of 66) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on 02/24/22. It presents a screenshot of Twitter activity involving 'Scotty David' (identified in the text as Juror No. 50), who interacted with witness Annie Farmer and journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The legal commentary notes that Juror No. 50 changed his handle to '@NycSsddd' and attempted to delete a tweet to Ms. Farmer shortly after sending it.
DOJ-OGR-00031401.jpg
This document is a Palm Beach Post newspaper article from November 16, 2007, discussing the controversial legal case against Jeffrey Epstein for soliciting underage girls. The article critiques the justice system and State Attorney Barry Krischer, suggesting Epstein's wealth might lead to a lenient plea deal, and names his high-profile legal team including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr. A handwritten note indicates the article was faxed to the State Attorney's Office and filed as part of the official case record.
DOJ-OGR-00031398.jpg
A 2007 Palm Beach Post editorial faxed to the State Attorney's office in 2008, criticizing the potential leniency of the judicial system toward Jeffrey Epstein. The article outlines the allegations involving underage girls, the involvement of high-profile defense attorneys like Dershowitz and Starr, and the controversial decision by State Attorney Barry Krischer to send the case to a grand jury rather than filing charges directly. It expresses concern that Epstein's wealth is buying him a favorable plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00031278.jpg
This document, an excerpt from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, lists top donors who contributed at least $50,000 to Democratic Governor-elect Bill Richardson's campaign. Notable donors include Jeffrey E. Epstein and Cap II, each giving $50,000, as well as several political action committees and corporations contributing larger amounts. The document also provides background on Epstein, mentioning his ownership of J. Epstein & Co. and the Zorro Ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00017245.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, outlines allegations of overt acts in a conspiracy case. It describes how between 2001 and 2004, Epstein's employees sent gifts, including lingerie, to a woman named Carolyn and that Epstein, Maxwell, or employees called her to schedule massages for Epstein. The document concludes with a legal argument explaining that to convict Ms. Maxwell of conspiracy, the prosecution only needs to prove that any member of the conspiracy committed an overt act, not necessarily Maxwell herself.
DOJ-OGR-00013951.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of Ms. Espinosa's testimony, confirming she worked at Jeffrey Epstein's Madison Avenue office but never at his homes or Palm Beach property. Following her dismissal, defense attorney Mr. Everdell calls the next witness, Mr. Raghu Sud, who is sworn in.
DOJ-OGR-00013899.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding from August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. She testifies that during her six years of employment with Jeffrey Epstein's company, her primary workplace was an office at 457 Madison in Manhattan. She also states that she worked at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence for a total of about one to two weeks, but never worked at Jeffrey Epstein's residence in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00013895.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa describes a unique hiring process involving a preliminary interview with Ghislaine Maxwell conducted in the back of a limousine driving around Manhattan. Following this successful 'test,' Espinosa was permitted to meet with Jeffrey Epstein at his office for a final interview and subsequently received a job offer.
DOJ-OGR-00013615.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness describes their family's difficult financial situation during their teenage years, noting their parents were divorced and their mother, a sales rep for Owen Company, supported the family with little help. The witness also provides details about their older sister, Maria Farmer, who lived in Manhattan and worked as a painter after completing graduate school.
DOJ-OGR-00013398.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers discusses a flight log, detailing "flight number one" on an HS125-700 aircraft (N404CB) from Wilmington, DE, to Teterboro, NJ, which was a repositioning flight after the aircraft was purchased. Rodgers also states that when they began working for Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein lived in an apartment in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00013389.jpg
This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers describes a large townhouse in Manhattan where Ms. Maxwell lived and discusses the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein between 1991 and 2004, stating it was initially romantic but later ceased to be. The witness also explains that Ms. Maxwell would provide notice of Mr. Epstein's upcoming flights via beeper and later cell phone, typically 24 hours to three days in advance.
DOJ-OGR-00013385.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large apartment in Manhattan, located at 59th Street near Columbus Circle, and testifies that Ms. Maxwell moved from there to a studio apartment in late 1991 or early 1992. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the relevance of the questioning, which is then debated in court.
DOJ-OGR-00010723.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, filed as part of a legal case. The author describes the severe, long-term physical (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) and psychological trauma they endured, and their journey toward healing through therapy. The arrests of Epstein and Maxwell provided a sense of validation, prompting the author to attend Maxwell's trial in Manhattan to seek justice and closure for the abuse that derailed their life for over two decades.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity