Manhattan
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000276.jpg
This document is page 3 of a defense filing arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's release on bail pending trial. It asserts that Epstein has complied with all sex offender registration requirements for 10 years, argues he is not a danger to the community, and proposes strict release conditions including home detention in Manhattan, GPS monitoring, and the surrender of his passport. The defense specifically disputes a government claim that Epstein holds three active passports, stating he had only one which has been surrendered.
DOJ-OGR-00020889.jpg
This Reuters news article reports on the perspectives of jurors from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Juror Scotty David describes how another juror, Carolyn, was influenced by a fellow juror's story of growing up in a similar socioeconomic background, leading her to believe girls in her neighborhood could have been victimized by people like Epstein and Maxwell. David also states his own conviction that Maxwell was complicit and not merely a scapegoat for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020887.jpg
This Reuters article, dated January 5, 2022, reports on the jury deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. A juror, Scotty David, revealed that some jurors initially doubted the credibility of two accusers' memories. David, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse himself, shared his personal experience with the jury, which helped them understand trauma's effect on memory and ultimately led to a unanimous guilty verdict against Maxwell on December 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020869.jpg
This document is a court exhibit (A-243) containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent. It features an interview with Scotty David, a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who discusses why the jury found the victims credible and the verdict justified. David reveals his own history as a sexual abuse survivor, explaining how his personal experience helped him understand how victims process traumatic memories.
DOJ-OGR-00020761.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on April 16, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court summarizes its rulings, denying Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges based on Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, untimeliness, vagueness, and grand jury venue issues. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury counts, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking/Mann Act charges.
DOJ-OGR-00020754.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment, filed on March 29, 2021, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or his employees arranged for "Minor Victim-4" to provide massages for Epstein. The page also outlines COUNT SIX, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor for recruiting and transporting a person under 18 for commercial sex acts in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere during the same period.
DOJ-OGR-00018973.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large townhouse in Manhattan, the nature of the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein between 1991 and 2004 as changing from romantic to not romantic, and the process by which Ms. Maxwell would provide 24-72 hours notice for flights on Mr. Epstein's planes via beeper or cell phone.
DOJ-OGR-00018968.jpg
This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers describes his interactions with Ms. Maxwell between 1991 and 2004, which included communicating by beeper and cell phone, and seeing her at an office and on Mr. Epstein's airplanes. The witness details personally visiting four of Ms. Maxwell's New York City residences (on 59th, 84th, and 65th Streets, plus a studio on the Upper East Side) to annually service first aid kits for her.
DOJ-OGR-00018537.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of FBI Special Agent Maguire. Maguire testifies about his role as the search team leader for the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence, located at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan, on July 6, 2019. He explains the duties of a search team leader and confirms his squad provides operational support to other agents' cases.
DOJ-OGR-00016240.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court transcript (Document 759, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. The witness testifies about her family's financial struggles during her youth, her mother's employment at Owen Company, and introduces her older sister, Maria Farmer, who was a painter living in Manhattan at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00016139.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The prosecutor outlines the evidence to be presented, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's wealth, luxury properties (Palm Beach, Manhattan, NM, Paris, USVI), and private planes. It specifically defines the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein as intimate partners starting in the early 1990s, transitioning to 'best of friends' and closest associates.
DOJ-OGR-00002365(1).jpg
This document is page 18 of a court filing (Document 134) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government/prosecutor engaged in misconduct similar to the 'Chemical Bank' precedent, specifically by misleading the court regarding previous meetings with a firm and encouraging an investigation despite protective orders. The document contains significant redactions regarding the judge's specific comments and rulings.
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government's prior representations about its investigation were false. It details how attorneys from Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, providing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies highlights his firm's conviction that they could prove a "massive sex trafficking ring" was in operation.
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
This legal document page, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government was aware of information beyond public filings when it began its investigation. It cites a February 29, 2016 meeting where attorneys from Boies Schiller urged AUSA Amanda Kramer to investigate Epstein and Maxwell, and a later approach in summer 2016 by David Boies himself asking the government to consider perjury charges against Maxwell. The document includes a quote from Boies stating they had evidence of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(2).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's representations about when it began its investigation were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from the law firm Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, citing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies details the extensive evidence they claimed to possess about a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's claims about when its investigation began were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from Boies Schiller met with AUSA Amanda Kramer on February 29, 2016, to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. Furthermore, it states that David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury, quoting Boies on the extensive evidence they had of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002351.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a court filing (Document 134) in the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal authorities and articles referenced in the main brief, including a New York Daily News article about federal prosecutors declining to pursue Epstein and Maxwell in 2016, and a New York Times piece by Norman Mailer. It also cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOJ-OGR-00002351(1).jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The page is a table of authorities, citing two newspaper articles, a federal rule of civil procedure, and a constitutional amendment. The articles reference a 1980 piece by Norman Mailer and a 2020 report that Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00002331.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, arguing for the dismissal of her indictment. The defense claims a Sixth Amendment violation due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors in the selection pool and alleges the government rushed her arrest for publicity reasons to coincide with the anniversary of the Epstein indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002327.jpg
This legal document is an argument on behalf of defendant Ms. Maxwell, challenging the composition of the grand jury that indicted her. It cites an analysis by jury expert Jeffrey Martin from a similar case, United States v. Balde, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons in the White Plains jury wheel. The argument posits that since Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same system, her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community was violated.
DOJ-OGR-00002327(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It cites a parallel case, U.S. v. Balde, and an expert analysis by Jeffrey Martin, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the White Plains jury wheel. Because Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same pool, the document contends this analysis applies to her case as well.
DOJ-OGR-00021948.jpg
This document is page 7 of 8 from a court filing (Document 9) dated November 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (related to the prosecution of Epstein's guards, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas). It displays a map outlining the jurisdictional boundaries of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Eastern District of New York (EDNY), listing the specific counties included in each district. There are handwritten notes in the bottom right corner that appear to read 'DNO' and 'EDPA'.
DOJ-OGR-00021940.jpg
This document is page 9 of a 10-page court filing from November 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It is part of an "Advice of Penalties" form and consists of a map and a list defining the counties that fall under the jurisdiction of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York federal courts. The document is marked with a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating it was produced as part of a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021909.jpg
This legal document, filed on November 19, 2019, is page 2 of a filing related to the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein. It identifies the defendants, correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, and details their employment history at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The document specifies Noel's work shifts on August 8, 9, and 10, 2019, leading up to the discovery of Epstein's body after he committed suicide.
DOJ-OGR-00021664.jpg
This legal document describes the close personal and financial relationship between Maxwell and Epstein over more than a decade, highlighting their shared lavish lifestyle across multiple properties. It details Maxwell's role as supervisor of Epstein's households, where she imposed strict rules on staff to create a 'culture of silence' to protect their criminal activities. A key example is her directive to a manager, Juan Alessi, on how to interact with Epstein, underscoring her authority and the secretive nature of the household operations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity