Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Moe

Person
Mentions
1588
Relationships
122
Events
654
Documents
778
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
122 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
26
View
organization The government
Representative
17 Very Strong
21
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
13
View
organization The government
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
8
View
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
228
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
11 Very Strong
13
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mrs. Hesse
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person JANE
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Maguire
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
28
View
person the Judge
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person Jane
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person MR. COHEN
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Special Agent Maguire
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional adversarial
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Drescher
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Business associate
8 Strong
4
View
person Mr. McHugh
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Trial Resumption Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Discussion of Jury Instructions Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government meeting with witness Brian. Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the duration of the conspiracy Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Jane' regarding prior statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court discussion regarding jury deliberations and note interpretation Courtroom View
N/A N/A Afternoon Court Session during Jury Deliberations Courtroom View
N/A N/A Afternoon session of sentencing hearing begins. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Hearing/Sidebar Courtroom View
N/A Trial An ongoing trial where testimony is being heard and discussed. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the 'business record exception' and admissibility of phone logs/notes. Courtroom View
N/A Trial The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where this summation was delivered. Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Legal filing A discussion about filing a brief on the 900 series for the witness Maguire. The court mandates i... N/A View
N/A Court proceeding An attorney is arguing against a 'leadership enhancement' for Maxwell, citing trial testimony to ... Courtroom View
N/A Legal argument A discussion in court about whether a conspiracy continued through all of 2004 and into 2005. N/A View
N/A Court hearing A legal argument took place regarding the admissibility of evidence, specifically photographs, an... Courtroom View
N/A Legal motion The government, represented by Ms. Moe, moved to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlyin... Courtroom View
N/A Trial A criminal trial where Ghislaine Maxwell is the defendant, and Ms. Moe is delivering a summation. courtroom View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing to discuss scheduling for an upcoming trial, including setting deadlines and hear... Southern District Court View
N/A Trial A trial where expert testimony was heard from Dr. Rocchio and testimony from Matt. N/A View
N/A Meeting The Court instructs the parties to confer to try and reach a resolution on the privilege issue. Unknown View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness PATRICK McHUGH, including direct, cross, and redirect. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness KELLY MAGUIRE, including direct and cross. N/A View
N/A Trial A summation is being given in a criminal trial where the defense has attacked the credibility of ... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Legal argument A discussion in court between MS. MOE and THE COURT about whether a conspiracy was still ongoing ... Courtroom (implied) View

DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a government attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the legal end date of a conspiracy, with the government arguing it extended through 2004 and into 2005. The judge expresses concern that the evidence cited by the government is 'post conspiracy' because it falls after the date in the indictment and, crucially, after a person named Carolyn turned 18, an event upon which the conspiracy's continuation was legally dependent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
124
As Recipient
13
Total
137

Sentencing Guidelines / Supervisory Role

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe argues that trial evidence proves Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, satisfying the requirement for an organizer/leader enhancement.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing recommendation

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Requesting an above-guideline sentence to hold the defendant accountable and send a message that no one is above the law.

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling and Sealing

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe updates the court that the prosecution anticipates resting their case 'this week' and discusses sealing a document containing pseudonym identities.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photographs

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether photographs corroborate a witness's blind description of a residence interior given the time lapse.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Verification of facts

From: Ms. Moe
To: agents

Conferring with the agent involved in breaching the door to verify information.

Consultation
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding travel records

From: Ms. Moe
To: Mr. Sud

Clarifying the start date of travel bookings (1999) and the date range of records in exhibit RS-1 (1999-2006).

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Scheduling Concerns

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe argues the request is premature but states that if the defense rests the week of the 20th, the jury should be permitted to deliberate.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding clarification of New York vs New Mexico law in jury charges.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing arguments

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Prosecution opening statement regarding sentencing recommendation for Ghislaine Maxwell.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Post-testimony discussion

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["Jane's attorney"]

Ms. Moe spoke with Jane's attorney following Jane's testimony, reminding him of something.

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Discrepancy in conspiracy end date

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe states that if the conspiracy end date mentioned by the court (July 2004) differs from the sentencing transcript, they will submit a letter to the Court.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Potential discrepancy in conspiracy end date

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe states that if a review of exhibits shows a different date than the sentencing transcript, 'we will submit a letter to the Court'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Potential discrepancy in conspiracy end date

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe states that if a review of exhibits shows a different date than the sentencing transcript, 'we will submit a letter to the Court'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Duration of a criminal conspiracy

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

MS. MOE argues to the Court that a conspiracy was still active at the end of 2004, citing Carolyn's testimony about visiting Epstein's house as evidence.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Duration of a criminal conspiracy

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

MS. MOE argues to the Court that a conspiracy was still active at the end of 2004, citing Carolyn's testimony about visiting Epstein's house as evidence.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: MS. MENNINGER
To: Ms. Moe

Ms. Menninger reports to the court that "Ms. Moe and I spoke briefly."

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Jane's testimony

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["Jane's attorney"]

Ms. Moe spoke with Jane's attorney following Jane's testimony, recalling that she told and reminded him of something (the details are cut off).

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Copy of notes

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["Chambers"]

Ms. Moe suggests that during the court break, they will send an email containing a copy of the notes to the judge's chambers.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Discrepancy in conspiracy end date

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe states that if the conspiracy end date from the exhibits differs from the sentencing transcript, she will submit a letter to the Court.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Testimony of Special Agent Maguire regarding their FBI ro...

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["Special Agent Maguire"]

Ms. Moe questions Special Agent Maguire about their employment at the FBI, their assignment to the C20 child exploitation and human trafficking task force, their specific job responsibilities, and their involvement in an FBI operation on July 6, 2019.

Direct examination
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["Mr. Glassman"]

Ms. Moe refers to a note she made about a conversation with Mr. Glassman, which she argues cannot be an exhibit at trial.

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

End date of a conspiracy and post-conspiracy evidence

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe argues that trial evidence shows a conspiracy continued through 2004 and into 2005. The Court challenges this, suggesting the evidence is for post-conspiracy conduct as it exceeds the date of Carolyn's 18th birthday, a key element of the charge.

Court hearing dialogue
2023-06-29
Communication Source

Anonymity Order Confirmation

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

MS. MOE asks the Court to confirm that the anonymity order for the witness Kate, particularly regarding sketch artists, is in effect.

Court dialogue
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Response to argument

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe, when asked to respond to Mr. Everdell's point, declines to offer a verbal rebuttal and states that they rest on their previously submitted briefing on the issue.

Court proceeding
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Objection to Offense Level Calculation

From: Ms. Moe
To: unnamed judge

Ms. Moe objects to the judge's calculation under guideline 3D1.4, stating that 5 units should add 4 levels, not 5.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search