Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Minor Victim-2

Person
Mentions
139
Relationships
30
Events
41
Documents
68
Also known as:
Minor Victim-2 (Annie Farmer)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
30 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Perpetrator victim
10 Very Strong
7
View
person MAXWELL
Abuser victim
6
2
View
person MAXWELL
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Alleged abuser victim
6
2
View
person DETECTIVE RECAREY
No interaction
5
1
View
person Accuser-2
Alias
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Alleged perpetrator victim
5
1
View
person Respondent (Maxwell)
Alleged interaction denied
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim perpetrator
5
1
View
person BSF
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MAXWELL
Abusive
5
1
View
person defendant
Perpetrator victim
5
1
View
person witness
Alleged interaction
5
1
View
person MAXWELL
Groomer and victim
5
1
View
person Epstein
Abuser and victim
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Accuser defendant
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Alleged victim perpetrator
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Abuser victim
5
1
View
person Epstein
Abusive
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Alleged perpetrator and victim
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Abuser victim
5
1
View
organization BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
Legal representative
5
1
View
person USAO-SDFL
Witness investigator
5
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Groomer victim
5
1
View
person Minor Victim-1
Co victims grouped by age
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Trips taken by Minor Victim-2 with Epstein Unknown View
N/A Alleged crime Alleged instances of sexual abuse took place over a three-year period beginning approximately 27 ... N/A View
N/A Alleged act Ms. Maxwell allegedly "took Minor Victim -2 to a movie". N/A View
N/A Crime Epstein abusing Minor Victim-1 and Minor Victim-2. N/A View
N/A Massage Minor Victim-2 gave an unsolicited massage while topless. New Mexico View
N/A N/A Grooming and abuse Unspecified View
N/A N/A Minor Victim-2 trip to New York New York, NY View
N/A N/A First meeting between Minor Victim-2, Epstein, and Maxwell Unknown View
N/A N/A Recruitment of Minor Victim-2 to engage in sex acts with Epstein. Palm Beach Residence View
N/A Grooming MAXWELL began her efforts to groom Minor Victim-2 for abuse by Epstein. New Mexico View
N/A Grooming MAXWELL began efforts to groom Minor Victim-2 for abuse by Epstein, including providing an unsoli... New Mexico View
N/A Meeting MAXWELL interacted with Minor Victim-2 at Epstein's residence in New Mexico when the victim was u... New Mexico View
N/A Trip Minor Victim-2 had flown into New Mexico from out of state at Epstein's invitation for the purpos... New Mexico View
N/A Social activity While in New Mexico, MAXWELL and Epstein took Minor Victim-2 to a movie and MAXWELL took Minor Vi... New Mexico View
N/A Grooming In New Mexico, MAXWELL began her efforts to groom Minor Victim-2 for abuse by Epstein. New Mexico View
N/A Recruitment and sexual abuse JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited multiple minor victims (Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, Min... Manhattan, New York; Palm B... View
N/A Trip Minor Victim-2 flew into New Mexico from out of state at Epstein's invitation. New Mexico View
N/A Crime MAXWELL began efforts to groom Minor Victim-2 for abuse by Epstein. New Mexico View
N/A Meeting MAXWELL interacted with Minor Victim-2 at Epstein's residence. New Mexico View
N/A Trip Minor Victim-2 had flown into New Mexico from out of state at Epstein's invitation. New Mexico View
N/A N/A Took Minor Victim-2 to a movie Unknown View
N/A Grooming Request to identify dates when Ms. Maxwell allegedly groomed Minor Victim-2 to engage in acts of ... N/A View
N/A Grooming/interaction MAXWELL interacted with Minor Victim-2, who was under 18, at Epstein's residence. Minor Victim-2 ... Epstein's residence in New ... View
N/A Social activity/grooming While in New Mexico, MAXWELL and Epstein took Minor Victim-2 to a movie. New Mexico View
N/A Social activity/grooming While in New Mexico, MAXWELL took Minor Victim-2 shopping. New Mexico View

DOJ-OGR-00003055.jpg

This document is a page from a Government legal filing in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing that certain evidence (depositions from April and July 2016) would have been 'inevitably discovered' regardless of protective order modifications. A significant footnote details Judge Preska's refusal in the related civil case to keep Maxwell's testimony sealed, specifically highlighting testimony where Maxwell denied giving massages to Jeffrey Epstein or 'Minor Victim-2,' which forms the basis of perjury charges (Count Six).

Court filing (legal memorandum/brief)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00003010.jpg

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) outlines the Government's argument that the defendant has failed to prove prejudice regarding the unavailability of Detective Recarey and various unnamed 'Epstein employees.' The text argues that fading memories and lost witnesses do not automatically justify dismissing the indictment. A footnote clarifies that Minor Victim-2 was interviewed by the FBI, but not by Detective Recarey.

Court filing (legal memorandum/opinion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002992.jpg

This page is from a government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing against the defendant's motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations. The text asserts that the Ex Post Facto Clause is not violated because the limitations period had not expired for Counts One through Four when it was extended in 2003. Footnotes address the specific ages of Minor Victims 1, 2, and 3 in relation to the 2003 extension and discuss the 'Landgraf' Supreme Court precedent regarding legislative retroactivity.

Legal filing / court document (government response/opposition brief)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002977.jpg

This document is a page from a Government legal filing opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss her indictment. The Government argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida cannot logically grant Maxwell immunity for future crimes (specifically perjury) committed a decade later, nor grant her broader immunity than Epstein himself received. A footnote clarifies the scope of the original Florida investigation, noting that while Minor Victim-2 was interviewed then, Minor Victims 1 and 3 were not interviewed and did not speak to law enforcement until 2019.

Legal filing (government opposition brief/memorandum)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004739.jpg

This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 4, 2021, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to access the entirety of a diary written by Minor Victim-2. The court notes that the diary entries stopped shortly after the victim met Jeffrey Epstein and do not reference Maxwell or later trips with Epstein. The court rejects Maxwell's arguments based on Federal Rules of Evidence 106 and 612, stating that the journal's relevance is currently limited to potential impeachment.

Court order / legal filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg

This is page 2 of a court order filed on June 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Maxwell. The court is addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to subpoena the entire journal of 'Minor Victim-2.' The court rejects Maxwell's arguments, characterizing the request as a 'fishing expedition' and noting that impeachment material is generally not obtainable via Rule 17(c) subpoena prior to trial. The document also notes that 'BSF' (likely legal counsel for the victim) has stated the unproduced portions of the journal do not mention Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein.

Court order / legal filing (page 2 of 6)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004737.jpg

This document is a Court Order filed on June 4, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for specific items, including a victim's teenage diary, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The judge notes that while the victim's diary describes visiting Epstein in New York, there is no indication Maxwell is mentioned in the journal.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002855.jpg

This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002877.jpg

This legal document is a letter from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF objects to a subpoena issued by Maxwell's defense, arguing it is overly broad and lacks clarity on which victims require notice, while clarifying that the firm represents victims Annie Farmer (Minor Victim-2) and Virginia Giuffre. The firm states its intention to notify all Epstein victims it represents about the subpoena out of an abundance of caution.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002680.jpg

This document is a preliminary statement from a legal motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on February 4, 2021. The defense requests that the Court strike allegations related to 'Accuser-3' from the indictment, arguing that the alleged conduct occurred in England where Accuser-3 was above the age of consent and did not involve travel. The motion claims the government is improperly using these allegations to bolster its case regarding Mann Act violations involving 'Accuser-1' and Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005836.jpg

This document page discusses legal arguments regarding the admissibility of testimony from "Minor Victim-3" in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and a defendant. The text argues against the defense's claim that such testimony would be unfairly prejudicial or cause confusion regarding United Kingdom law, asserting that jury instructions will be sufficient.

Legal filing / court order page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg

This legal document is a court filing, page 50 of 84, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the defense's argument to dismiss allegations concerning "Minor Victim-3," claiming the defendant's conduct with her was lawful in the United Kingdom and that she was an adult when she was later abused by Epstein in the U.S. The defense contends the government mistakenly charged the defendant, believing Minor Victim-3 was a minor at the time of the alleged sex acts with Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005831.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against precluding the testimony of 'Minor Victim-3' in the trial of the defendant, Maxwell. The prosecution contends that even if the acts against this victim were uncharged, her testimony is crucial to establish a pattern of abuse, show the defendant's relationship with Epstein, and prove her knowing participation in a conspiracy. The document cites legal precedent to support delaying any decision to strike this evidence until after the government has presented its case at trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002858.jpg

This document is page 16 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations, including Maxwell encouraging 'Minor Victim-3' to massage Epstein in London (1994-1995) and inviting 'Minor Victim-4' to travel from Florida with Epstein (2001-2002). The page formally lays out 'COUNT FOUR,' charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002849.jpg

This document is a page from a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It alleges that defendant Ghislaine Maxwell induced and enticed several minor victims, including Minor Victim-1, whom she met at age 14. The text details how Maxwell, in concert with Epstein, groomed Minor Victim-1 between 1994 and 1997 at Epstein's residences by befriending her and normalizing abusive conduct.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002719.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 148-1) from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 4, 2021. It contains a list of specific legal requests (numbered 14-26) asking the government to provide particular details regarding allegations of grooming, sexual abuse, and interstate travel involving Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and three anonymous minor victims (Minor Victim-1, -2, and -3). The document references specific timeframes, including a conspiracy period from 1994-1997 and a specific travel incident in 1996.

Legal filing (request for particulars/interrogatories)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002718.jpg

This legal document, a "List of Particulars" filed on February 4, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, is a series of requests for the prosecution to provide specific details about allegations against Ms. Maxwell. The requests seek information such as dates, locations, and specific actions related to Ms. Maxwell's alleged involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the grooming and sexual abuse of individuals identified as Minor Victim-1 and Minor Victim-2. The document also requests clarification on alleged travel across state lines for the purpose of sexual encounters.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002705.jpg

This document is a legal filing from a court case dated February 4, 2021. The defense argues that the contents of a specific interview constitute exculpatory 'Brady material' and asks the Court to compel the government to produce any notes or reports from it, which are currently missing from discovery. The defense also notes its requests for the government to provide unredacted copies of two specific FBI reports that were part of the Miami FBI's investigation.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
1996-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Minor Victim-2 $0.00 Shopping trip provided by Maxwell to Minor Vict... View
As Sender
3
As Recipient
5
Total
8

Investigation interview

From: FBI
To: Minor Victim-2

The FBI previously interviewed Minor Victim-2.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Personal entries

From: Minor Victim-2
To: Self

Stopped writing shortly after meeting Epstein; contains no entries regarding later trips with Epstein.

Diary/journal
N/A
Communication Source

Personal Journal

From: Minor Victim-2
To: Self

Entries from before Minor Victim-2 met Epstein or Maxwell; defense seeks full access.

Diary
N/A
Communication Source

Personal experiences

From: Minor Victim-2
To: Self

Describes trip to NY, time with Epstein, visit to his residence, impressions of him.

Journal/diary
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling appointment

From: Employee-2
To: Minor Victim-2

Scheduling appointment for Minor Victim-2 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.

Telephone call
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: MAXWELL (implied)
To: Minor Victim-2

An unsolicited message was sent to Minor Victim-2, during which she was topless. MAXWELL encouraged her to massage Epstein.

Unsolicited message
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: Employee-2
To: Minor Victim-2

Scheduling appointment for sex acts with Epstein.

Call
2005-01-01
Communication Source

Personal Information

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Minor Victim-2

Maxwell discussed school, classes, and family with the victim.

Conversation
1996-01-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search