The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A request is made for an in camera conference to address confidentiality concerns. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a protective order for discovery materials in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a repo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 532 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-01 | Court filing | The Government filed this letter in response to a court order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-01-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a request for a 30-day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Legal filing | Submission of a statement in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-11-30 | Legal request | A request was made to the Court to file redacted versions of letters related to a bail applicatio... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-14 | Legal filing | A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of... | S.D.N.Y. (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding redactions and sealing of documents i... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Legal filing | A motion was filed with the court on behalf of Ms. Maxwell requesting changes to her detention co... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-29 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document (Page 3 of 5) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008226.jpg
This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension to file joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request to file motions in limine with proposed redactions to protect victim privacy.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of motions in limine under seal with proposed redactions to protect victim privacy.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits this letter to explain the process for delivering legal mail to the defendant at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), in response to a Court Order.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government's response regarding the deadline for filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to Court's Order regarding delivery of defendant's legal mail at the MDC.
Deadline for Filing Motion under Federal Rule of Evidence...
Request to confirm November 15, 2021 as the deadline for filing a Rule 412 motion, citing recent discovery disclosures and procedural rules.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits its estimate for the length of its case-in-chief, projecting approximately four weeks. This is in response to the Court's Order of October 5, 2021, which directed parties to estimate when the jury would begin deliberations.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire; request to file under seal to avoid media prejudice.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Legal submission bringing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in the Bill Cosby case to the court's attention, arguing it supports dismissing counts against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitted to the Court to draw attention to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in the William Henry Cosby Jr. case, arguing it provides support for Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges based on a non-prosecution agreement.
Motion to dismiss based on Cosby precedent
Argument that the government is violating due process by reneging on the NPA, citing the vacating of Bill Cosby's conviction.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of unsealed copies of Exhibits D, E, F, and G related to Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress, pursuant to a court order.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitted to the Court to draw attention to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in the William Henry Cosby Jr. case, arguing it provides support for Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges based on a non-prosecution agreement.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Update regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement at the MDC.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submitted a letter to Judge Nathan providing an update on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, detailing her extensive access to discovery materials and other amenities.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file a joint letter regarding the pretrial schedule.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to Court Order regarding flashlight usage in security checks at MDC.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for court order directing MDC to accept defense-prepared hard drives for Maxwell's discovery review.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to defense letter regarding superseding indictment timing and opposition to trial adjournment.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media playback equipment (VCR, cassette player, etc.) to the courthouse for an evidence view involving the defendant.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Update regarding defendant's conditions of confinement and discovery review access.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits this letter regarding the defendant's application to subpoena records from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The Government requests that the Court direct the defendant to provide the Government with a copy of the proposed subpoena and that any materials produced in response be shared with the Government.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government notifies the Court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment (S2) against Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter aims to identify differences between the S1 and S2 indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter to the Court clarifying a previous statement. It acknowledges that while the current Prosecution Team was not involved in the prior 'Florida Investigation', new information suggests the FBI New York Office may have participated in it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity