The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A request is made for an in camera conference to address confidentiality concerns. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a protective order for discovery materials in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a repo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 532 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-01 | Court filing | The Government filed this letter in response to a court order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-01-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a request for a 30-day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Legal filing | Submission of a statement in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-11-30 | Legal request | A request was made to the Court to file redacted versions of letters related to a bail applicatio... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-14 | Legal filing | A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of... | S.D.N.Y. (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding redactions and sealing of documents i... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Legal filing | A motion was filed with the court on behalf of Ms. Maxwell requesting changes to her detention co... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-29 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document (Page 3 of 5) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008226.jpg
This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government writes to inform the Court of a recent, relevant decision by Judge Crotty in the case of U.S. v. Schulte, where a motion to dismiss an indictment, similar to the one filed by Ghislaine Maxwell, was denied. The Government argues this decision supports their position in the Maxwell case.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Rule...
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) writes to the court to object to a subpoena from defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF argues the subpoena is overly broad and lacks specificity regarding which victims require notice, but agrees that service on the firm constitutes adequate notice for the victims it represents. The firm clarifies it represents Minor Victim-2 (Annie Farmer) and Virginia Giuffre, but not Minor Victims 1 or 3.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Listing of 12 reply memoranda to be filed regarding motions to dismiss and suppress evidence, along with procedural details regarding redactions and sealing.
Filing of Reply Memoranda with Redactions
A letter explaining the procedure for submitting reply memoranda, some of which contain confidential information and require redaction. The author proposes submitting both redacted and unredacted versions to the Court and government for review before public filing.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Cover letter listing 10 reply memoranda being filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding various motions to dismiss, suppress evidence, and sever trials.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government opposition to defendant's third motion for release on bail.
Request for deadline extension
Requesting the deadline for filing the defendant's reply be moved to Monday, March 15, 2021.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the Government to the Court providing an update on defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Update regarding defendant's conditions of confinement at MDC.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government responds to a court order and a letter from MDC legal counsel regarding the defendant's access to a laptop for discovery review on weekends. The Government states it has no objection but defers to the MDC's policies on inmate management.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government responds to a court order regarding defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The Government states it does not object to her request for weekend laptop access but defers to the MDC's policies, arguing she already has ample access.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits this letter in response to the Court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions. The Government agrees with the defendant's proposals, stating the redactions are necessary to protect an ongoing investigation, grand jury secrecy, and the privacy of victim-witnesses.
Regarding filing of motions and redactions
Explanation of procedure for filing motions containing Confidential Information, including emailing unredacted versions to the Court and government for review before public docketing.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn wrote to Judge Nathan requesting that she vacate a January 15, 2021 order concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The MDC argues that Maxwell has been provided with sufficient access, including a laptop for 13 hours a day and extensive contact with her legal counsel.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification of filing 12 pretrial motions with accompanying exhibits on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The MDC requests that the Court vacate its January 15, 2021 order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery, arguing that her current access (laptop for 13 hours/day, 5 days/week, plus discovery computers and extensive legal calls) is sufficient.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The MDC requests the court vacate a January 15, 2021 order concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery, arguing that she has been provided with significant time and resources (a laptop and computers) to review materials and communicate with her counsel.
Request for Ms. Maxwell to have laptop access on weekends...
A letter from Christian Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting that the court order the Bureau of Prisons to grant his client, Ms. Maxwell, access to her laptop on weekends and holidays to review the millions of discovery documents for her defense.
Request for laptop access (implied)
Requesting the Court order the BOP to allow Ms. Maxwell access to a laptop for discovery review on weekends and holidays.
Request for Ms. Maxwell to have laptop access on weekends...
A letter from Christian Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting that the court order the Bureau of Prisons to grant his client, Ms. Maxwell, access to her laptop on weekends and holidays to review the millions of discovery documents for her defense.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting court order for Bureau of Prisons to allow Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays.
Request for laptop access
Requesting court order for BOP/MDC to allow Ms. Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting court order for BOP to allow Maxwell 7-day access to discovery laptop.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for court order regarding laptop access for discovery review.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for a 30-day extension to file a notice of appeal regarding the denial of bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity