The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A request is made for an in camera conference to address confidentiality concerns. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a protective order for discovery materials in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a repo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 532 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-01 | Court filing | The Government filed this letter in response to a court order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-01-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a request for a 30-day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Legal filing | Submission of a statement in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-11-30 | Legal request | A request was made to the Court to file redacted versions of letters related to a bail applicatio... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-14 | Legal filing | A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of... | S.D.N.Y. (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding redactions and sealing of documents i... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Legal filing | A motion was filed with the court on behalf of Ms. Maxwell requesting changes to her detention co... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-29 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document (Page 3 of 5) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008226.jpg
This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government's submission regarding the protective order, responding to defendant's letter of July 27, 2020.
Protective Order regarding victim identities
Argument against the defendant's demand to publicly name victims and support for the Government's Proposed Order to protect victim privacy.
Protective Order Dispute
Argument regarding the public naming of victims and protective orders.
Protective Order Dispute
Argument regarding the naming of victims and the scope of the protective order in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Opposition to Defense Proposal)
Argument against defense counsel's request to publicly identify victims and witnesses.
Proposed Protective Order
Requesting the Court enter Ms. Maxwell's proposed protective order.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for the Court to enter a protective order regarding discovery materials and outlining disputes with the government regarding witness restrictions and victim identification.
Victim/Witness Identities in a protective order
A legal argument regarding the terms of a protective order in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case, specifically concerning the ability of the defense to publicly reference alleged victims and witnesses who have already identified themselves publicly.
Protective Order / Victim Identities
Argument regarding the scope of a protective order concerning victim/witness identities, specifically regarding those who have already spoken publicly.
Protective order for discovery materials in the case agai...
A legal filing arguing for a protective order on discovery materials, specifically requesting that restrictions on the use of these materials apply not only to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, but also to the government's potential witnesses and their counsel.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government request for time to respond to defense counsel's motion for a protective order.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to the judge requesting the entry of a proposed protective order and outlining two remaining disputes with the government regarding its terms.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 27
Signature page of a legal submission respectfully submitted by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A request to the Court to issue an order prohibiting the Government, its agents, and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements about the case to protect Ghislaine Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
Request for order prohibiting extrajudicial statements
Argument that comments by Boies and McCawley violate rules and prejudice Maxwell's trial.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1(a) and protection of trial process
Argument regarding the restriction of public dissemination of information by lawyers and agents to ensure a fair trial.
Prejudicial statements by government and witness counsel
Argument that comments by Sweeney, Boies, McCawley, and Edwards violate local rules.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the Government to the Court proposing a briefing schedule for the defendant's detention hearing and renewing a request to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Proposal for scheduling arraignment and bail hearing; confirmation of contact with client.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity