The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
|
Professional judge court |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A request is made for an in camera conference to address confidentiality concerns. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a protective order for discovery materials in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Inquiry into Juror 50's potential bias due to childhood sexual abuse and his statements to a repo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, for which Annie Farmer's victim impact statement is provided. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-25 | Court filing | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, filed a letter to t... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 532 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Document filing | Cohen & Gresser LLP submitted a letter to the United States District Court. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-02-01 | Court filing | The Government filed this letter in response to a court order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-01-08 | Legal filing | Filing of a request for a 30-day extension of time to file a notice of appeal. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Legal filing | Submission of a statement in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-11-30 | Legal request | A request was made to the Court to file redacted versions of letters related to a bail applicatio... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-14 | Legal filing | A letter was filed with the court arguing against the government's request to delay disclosure of... | S.D.N.Y. (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-21 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding redactions and sealing of documents i... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter in opposition to the defendant's requests. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Legal filing | A motion was filed with the court on behalf of Ms. Maxwell requesting changes to her detention co... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-29 | Legal filing | Filing of a legal document (Page 3 of 5) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008226.jpg
This legal document, dated December 5, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's apartment. The author contends the photos, taken in 2019, cannot be proven to accurately represent the apartment's state during the charged conspiracy, which ended in 2004. The document highlights that the government's case for the photos' relevance relies solely on the testimony of a witness, "Jane," who described the apartment's interior based on her memory from an alleged visit in the mid-1990s.
Legal Filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Signature page of a legal correspondence or motion.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for redactions to defendant's letter motion and sealing of Exhibit 1 regarding testimony of Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman.
Admissibility of extrinsic evidence to prove a witness's ...
A legal argument asserting that extrinsic evidence is permissible to prove a witness's (Jane's) prior statement because she denied its substance during testimony, despite acknowledging the '3500 material' reflected it. The document also notes that counsel missed a deadline to identify all such statements.
Right to call witnesses in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
This document is the final page of a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan asserting Ms. Maxwell's constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel alerting the court regarding questions to be asked of attorneys Scarola, Edwards, and Glassman, arguing these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification that the Government refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government writes to the Court to request an order directing the defense to provide a list of witnesses it plans to call the following week, by 10:00 a.m. on December 13, 2021.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits a jointly proposed limiting instruction for the jury regarding Government Exhibit 52, as ordered by the Court.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government writes to the Court about its plan for questioning Witness-3 regarding sexual activity with Epstein. They intend to follow the Court's order by eliciting only basic information, but are concerned the jury might infer a lack of credibility from the lack of detail, referencing the defense's opening argument.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense response to government's letter regarding the admissibility of the '900 series photos'.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 525
Arguments regarding the exclusion of 'highly mobile' evidence (massage tables, artwork) and 2019 photographs.
Admissibility of interior photographs of Mr. Epstein's ap...
This document is a letter to a judge arguing against the admissibility of interior photos of Mr. Epstein's apartment, stating they do not accurately reflect the apartment's condition during the time of the charged conspiracy and that the government is improperly relying on Jane's testimony to corroborate them.
Evidentiary Objections
Arguments against admitting photos of vibrators, stuffed animals, and interior shots of Epstein's apartment.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government submits a letter motion to admit photographs from Jeffrey Epstein's New York house as evidence, arguing they are relevant because they corroborate the testimony of a witness known as 'Jane'.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notice that parties have agreed to a testimonial stipulation regarding Michael Dawson and request he be released from returning to court.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for permission to file a reply brief in support of the Government's motion to preclude the testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Motion requesting the Court determine that Minor Victims' birth certificates are self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence to avoid calling custodians to testify.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for clarification on cross-examination limits regarding witness professions and restrictions on courtroom sketch artists.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Government seeking clarification on cross-examination limits regarding witness professions and barring sketch artists from drawing witness likenesses.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Joint letter regarding protections for witness identities at trial, voir dire procedures, jury instructions, and sealed exhibits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Joint letter regarding protections for witness identities at trial, including nomenclature, voir dire procedures, jury instructions, and sealed exhibits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of joint request to charge and proposed verdict sheet, explanation of redactions, and submission of Exhibit A under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 under seal and plans to notify alleged victims' counsel.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
The Government seeks clarification regarding when parties will receive prospective jurors' names, requesting this occur no earlier than November 16, 2021.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification that Maxwell's Omnibus Response to Government's Motions in Limine was filed under seal to allow time for redaction review.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity