| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Edouard Philippe
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Ma
|
Sponsorship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sawires family
|
Seller buyer |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sawires sold shares in Orascom-Mobinil to France Telecom and offloaded cement holdings. | Egypt | View |
This document is an Austrian passport (No. N 0376775) issued on May 21, 1982, to 'Marius Robert Fortelni,' a manager allegedly residing in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The passport features a photograph of Jeffrey Epstein, indicating it was an alias document used by him. It contains numerous entry and exit stamps from 1982 and 1983, primarily for France (Charles de Gaulle, Orly, Nice), the UK (Heathrow), and Spain (Malaga), as well as a business visa for Saudi Arabia issued in Vienna.
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Exhibit 120-2) authored by attorney William Julié. It outlines legal arguments regarding extradition requests between the United States and France, specifically focusing on the 'nationality protection' clause in the 1996 Extradition Treaty and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. The text argues that extradition should not be granted if the person sought holds French nationality at the time of the offense.
This document is a formal statement from Philippe Jaeglé of the Office for the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, explaining that under Article 3 of the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France refuses to extradite its nationals to the United States. It clarifies that while France extradites nationals within the EU due to political integration and shared human rights standards (European arrest warrant), it has never deviated from the non-extradition principle for countries outside the EU. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a court filing header dated December 18, 2020.
This legal document, signed by Philippe JAEGLE of the French Office of International Criminal Mutual Legal Assistance, outlines France's policy on the extradition of its nationals. It states that based on a 1996 bilateral treaty, France systematically refuses to extradite French citizens to the United States, a principle that applies to all non-EU countries. However, an exception exists within the European Union, where the European Arrest Warrant mandates extradition between member states, overriding the principle of non-extradition of nationals.
This is page 14 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00001159) of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues against bail, citing the defendant's flight risk, wealth, and ability to frustrate extradition from France or the UK. A critical footnote reveals that in 2018, the defendant and her spouse established a trust account where they both falsely listed their marital status as 'single' on bank forms.
This document is an exhibit filed on December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It is a formal statement from Philippe Jaeglé of the French Office for International Mutual Assistance, clarifying that under the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France systematically refuses to extradite its own nationals to the United States. The text distinguishes this policy from intra-EU extradition rules.
This legal document, filed in a U.S. court case, is a statement from Philippe Jaegle of the French Office of International Mutual Legal Assistance. It explains that under French law and its 1996 extradition treaty with the U.S., France systematically refuses to extradite its own nationals. The document contrasts this with the system within the European Union, where, due to a high level of integration and shared legal standards, member states cannot refuse extradition of their nationals to other member states solely on the basis of nationality.
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae (CV) or professional biography submitted as an exhibit in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the subject's experience providing legal advice to high-profile international figures, including members of the Saudi Royal family and the Italian State, as well as their memberships in various international legal associations. The spelling of 'Irak' and 'Lybia' suggests the author may be European/French.
This document is a legal memorandum signed by Philippe Jaeglé of the French Office for the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. It explicitly clarifies that under the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France 'systematically refuses' to extradite its own nationals to the United States, noting this is a principle deviated from only within the European Union. This document is significant in the context of the Epstein case as it outlines the legal barrier that prevented the US from extraditing French associates like Jean-Luc Brunel.
This document discusses the bilateral extradition treaty between the United States and France signed on April 23, 1996. It outlines the principle of non-extradition of nationals and its application within the European Union framework, as well as the exceptions and conditions related to extradition requests.
This document appears to be a page (39) from a larger report or book included in a House Oversight production (Bates stamp 031872). The text provides a geopolitical history of Israel's military strategy and foreign relations from 1948 through 1967, detailing its shifting alliances with the Soviet Union, France, and the United States to ensure national security.
This document is page 37 of a historical or geopolitical text (likely a book or academic paper) included in a House Oversight production. It analyzes British naval strategy regarding the Suez Canal and India, the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire during WWI, and the subsequent division of the Middle East into territories like Palestine, Trans-Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. While part of a document set likely related to an investigation involving Epstein/Maxwell (given the footer), the specific content of this page is strictly historical analysis.
This document appears to be a page from a report (Appendix 2) analyzing Chinese (PRC) influence operations in Europe, specifically detailing activities in France and Germany. It highlights Huawei's financial sponsorships of French academic institutions, PRC control over Chinese-language media in France, and the promotion of pro-China narratives by specific French intellectuals. The section on Germany notes that while Chinese influence is sophisticated, it is hindered by public skepticism stemming from the Tiananmen Square massacre and targets younger professionals and EU stability.
This document, identified as page 158 of Appendix 2 from a House Oversight production, analyzes Chinese political influence and civil society operations in France around 2017-2018. It details the extradition of a PRC citizen, the cultivation of former French politicians like Dominique de Villepin by Chinese interests, and the rise of NGOs like the France-China Foundation supported by figures such as Jack Ma and Edouard Philippe. While part of a larger dataset often associated with investigations, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from the participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It functions as a directory, listing high-profile attendees alphabetically (from Cantor to Childs), including their job titles, organizations, and associated countries. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a collection of evidence reviewed by the US House Committee on Oversight.
This document is a page from the participant list of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists attendees alphabetically by surname, specifically covering the 'B' section (Bajaj to Benoit-Godet). The list includes high-profile figures such as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, and journalist Maria Bartiromo, detailing their titles, organizations, and countries of origin. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017063.
This is page 804 of a legal opinion from the Federal Supplement (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, though the case name is not explicitly at the top). It details the court's decision to grant the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's motion to dismiss a complaint based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The text also discusses standards for Personal Jurisdiction and the New York Long-Arm Statute, citing various legal precedents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.
This document is page 782 from a court opinion discussing subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It outlines the legal standards for immunity of foreign states, citing precedents like *Saudi Arabia v. Nelson* and *Virtual Countries v. Republic of South Africa*, and details the burden of proof required for plaintiffs to challenge a foreign state's immunity.
This document appears to be page 305 from an academic book or paper titled 'Morality Games,' marked with a Bates stamp from a House Oversight investigation (likely related to Epstein's academic funding or connections). The text discusses game theory models regarding social norms, sanctions, and enforcement, using examples such as the Obama administration's reaction to Syrian chemical weapons, the 'one-drop' rule, and workplace discrimination (specifically mentioning CEOs preferring attractive female secretaries).
This document is an article from The Guardian by Michael Boyle, dated April 2, 2011, analyzing President Obama's rationale for the military campaign in Libya. Boyle critiques the strategy as muddled, highlighting the shift from defensive operations to active involvement in a civil war with US, British, and French forces, and the coordination of CIA officers with Libyan rebels. The article also mentions the consideration of sending weapons to the rebels, reflecting a high level of ignorance about the conflict.
This document outlines economic developments in Arab countries starting in the 1990s, focusing on the rise of mobile networks, privatizations, and the emergence of Arab multinationals. It details how powerful families and governments controlled investments and revenue, citing examples like the Trabelsi, Materi, Ezz, Sawires, Makhlouf, and Hariri families as local partners, and mentions key figures like Najib Mikati and companies like Orascom and MTN. The text also touches on the impact of the 1986 oil price crash and the influence of the International Monetary Fund and European Commission on these economies, as well as real estate ventures inspired by the 'Dubai miracle'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity