new mexico
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Accuser 2
|
Location of incident |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Location of conduct |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Travel incident location |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Travel logistics |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Location of alleged conduct |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00014453.jpg
This document is a legal summation from a court case, outlining Ghislaine Maxwell's activities between 1995 and 2004. It details her role in recruiting, grooming, and exploiting several young women, including Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, for Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a timeline of abuse, financial transactions from Epstein to Maxwell totaling over $23 million, and the evolution of the abuse into a 'pyramid scheme' where victims were incentivized to recruit their friends.
DOJ-OGR-00014445.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the summation by Ms. Moe. The text details allegations of sexual abuse involving Epstein and Maxwell against minors named Jane, Annie, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, supported by evidence such as flight logs and FedEx records.
DOJ-OGR-00014440.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe. It details corroborating testimony from witnesses Janice Swain and David Mulligan (Annie's high school boyfriend) regarding what the victim, Annie, told them in the 1990s about a trip to New Mexico involving Maxwell and Epstein. The text highlights that Annie consistently described Maxwell buying her cowboy boots and sexually abusing her during a massage, a story she also told the FBI in 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00014439.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell filed on August 10, 2022. The text details an account involving a victim named Annie, stating that Maxwell and Epstein attempted to abuse her ('cuddle') in New Mexico, but she hid in a bathroom, causing Maxwell to lose interest. The prosecutor notes that Epstein subsequently paid for Annie to take a summer trip to Thailand, a fact corroborated by her mother and high school boyfriend, David Mulligan, despite the defense's attempt to use spotty border patrol records to dispute it.
DOJ-OGR-00014436.jpg
This document is a legal summation from a court case, filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony regarding a victim named Annie. It describes how Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein lured Annie to New Mexico under the false pretense of a scholarship trip, where Maxwell then engaged in grooming behaviors. The text recounts an incident at a movie theater where Epstein assaulted Annie, with Maxwell's full knowledge and complicity.
DOJ-OGR-00014428.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe (prosecution) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The speaker details two specific flights in May 1997 and April 1998 where a minor victim, 'Jane,' traveled with Epstein and Maxwell to New Mexico and New York. The speaker also rebuts the defense's argument that the 'Jane' listed in the flight logs was actually an adult personal assistant with the same first name, citing pilot and DMV testimony as proof.
DOJ-OGR-00014418.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, outlining the systematic method, or 'playbook,' used by Maxwell and Epstein to groom and abuse young girls. It details how they used isolation, false promises of gifts and opportunities, and relationship-building to manipulate victims like Annie, Jane, and Kate. The text specifically describes how Maxwell's actions escalated from grooming to direct sexual touching, highlighting her central role in the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe. She characterizes the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein as a sexual partnership, which afforded Maxwell a luxury lifestyle traveling between Epstein's many properties. To establish Maxwell's authority, Ms. Moe references the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former house manager, who stated Maxwell took control of the household immediately upon her arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00002875.jpg
This legal document, dated March 29, 2021, is a filing from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It clarifies the role of the FBI New York Office in an investigation conducted by the FBI Florida Office, stating that the New York office provided only 'ancillary support' by interviewing four witnesses between 2007 and 2008. The document asserts that this assistance did not make the New York office part of the prosecution team and that such inter-office cooperation is common.
DOJ-OGR-00008795.jpg
This legal document, dated December 27, 2021, is a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the jury in Ms. Maxwell's trial is confused. The author contends that the court's response to a jury note improperly allows them to consider conduct that occurred in New Mexico as a basis for conviction on counts requiring a violation of New York law. The filing cites legal precedent to argue that New York lacks jurisdiction over conduct occurring entirely out-of-state and that this issue could warrant vacating a potential conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00008793.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal submission to Judge Alison J. Nathan (dated Dec 27, 2021) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the jury must be instructed not to convict Maxwell on Count Four based on the victim 'Jane's' travel to New Mexico, as the indictment specifically charged travel to New York. The defense contends that a conviction based on the New Mexico events would constitute a 'constructive amendment' or 'variance' from the indictment, which is reversible error.
DOJ-OGR-00008757.jpg
This legal document outlines several overt acts related to Count Five of an indictment against Maxwell. It details the alleged recruitment and exploitation of a minor named Carolyn by Maxwell and Epstein between 2001 and 2004, including arranging travel, paying for sex acts, and encouraging her to recruit other girls. The document also mentions a separate incident involving another victim, Annie, in 1996, and explains the legal standard for proving an overt act in a conspiracy case.
DOJ-OGR-00008756.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 19, 2021. It outlines 'Instruction No. 36' regarding the 'overt act' requirement for conspiracy charges. The text explicitly lists alleged overt acts involving Maxwell and Epstein, including group sexual encounters with a minor ('Jane'), enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to 'Annie' in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008671.jpg
This legal document, part of an indictment, outlines several overt acts allegedly committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in furtherance of a conspiracy. The acts include the recruitment and sexual exploitation of a minor named Carolyn between 2001 and 2004, involving payments, encouragement to recruit others, and arranging appointments. The document also mentions a separate 1996 incident involving another victim, Annie, and clarifies the legal standard for proving an overt act in a conspiracy case.
DOJ-OGR-00008670.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the 'Third Element' of conspiracy, requiring an 'overt act,' and lists specific alleged acts including group sexual encounters involving Maxwell, Epstein, and a minor named Jane (1994-1997), an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to Annie in New Mexico (1996), and travel invitations to a minor named Carolyn (2001-2002).
DOJ-OGR-00017514.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The questioning focuses on the time Visoski's two young daughters spent with Ghislaine on a ranch in New Mexico, including horseback riding. Visoski confirms they trusted Ghislaine at the time and states they would 'absolutely not' have allowed their daughters to be with her if they had any inkling she was involved in helping Epstein sexually abuse young girls.
DOJ-OGR-00017480.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski confirms that Jeffrey Epstein gave him 40 acres of land on his New Mexico ranch to build a house and paid for the private high school tuition of Visoski's two daughters. Visoski also acknowledges that Epstein gave gifts to other employees as well.
DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms staying in a New York building with Dave Rogers and seeing other 'Epstein employees' there, specifically identifying Sarah Kellen in a '66th Street building'. The questioning concludes on this topic before shifting to a ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00014520.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for a defense team. Menninger argues against a previously established timeline concerning Annie Farmer, using flight logs and border patrol records to assert that Farmer's trips with Jeffrey and Ghislaine to New Mexico, and her subsequent trip to Thailand, occurred in 1997 when she was 17, not in 1996. The core of the argument is to discredit a narrative by highlighting discrepancies in dates and travel details.
DOJ-OGR-00014517.jpg
This document is page 117 of a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Menninger) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney argues against the credibility of a witness named Annie, highlighting inconsistencies between her testimony and statements made to the government in 2006 and 2020 regarding a trip to New Mexico and the nature of massages. The defense asserts that Epstein, not Maxwell, communicated with Annie's mother and that Maxwell was unaware of Epstein's hidden agenda.
DOJ-OGR-00014514.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. The speaker attempts to discredit two individuals: an unnamed woman by questioning her claims of secret flights and a $5 million payment from the government, and Annie Farmer by highlighting a court instruction that her alleged encounter with Epstein and Maxwell was not illegal as charged, and by noting that she was introduced to Epstein by her sister, Maria, who worked for him.
DOJ-OGR-00014505.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the witness 'Jane' originally had no memory of abuse in New Mexico in 2019 but fabricated or recovered a memory after being pressured by the government four times, characterizing this as 'suggestion.' The defense also highlights that Jane testified she does not recall ever being alone in a room with both Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein during the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014501.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger filed 08/10/22) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting inconsistencies in her testimony regarding dates, her age during specific trips (New York, New Mexico, Europe), and her communications with her mother regarding abuse versus other lawsuits. The text specifically mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and cites a 1997 flight log entry.
DOJ-OGR-00011700.jpg
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Pomerantz) opening statement in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor alleges that the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and facilitate the sexual abuse of multiple underage girls. Specific examples cited include the abuse of a girl named 'Jane' in New York and Florida, and the grooming and abuse of a 16-year-old girl at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00011694.jpg
This document is a page from the opening statement transcript by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the prosecution's intent to prove Maxwell's guilt and describes her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as his 'right hand,' 'best friend,' and 'closest associate.' It details Epstein's wealth, properties (Palm Beach, Manhattan, New Mexico, Paris, USVI), and private planes, noting that Maxwell shared in this lifestyle beginning in the early 1990s.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity