new mexico
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Accuser 2
|
Location of incident |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Location of conduct |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Travel incident location |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Travel logistics |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Location of alleged conduct |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00011659.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that under New Mexico law, the sexual activity in question was not illegal because it lacked force or coercion, and requests that jury instructions reflect this distinction. The Court agrees to consider how best to clarify this for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00011658.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Mr. Everdell), and the Judge regarding jury instructions for a Mann Act conspiracy count. The specific issue involves whether sexual conduct was illegal under New Mexico law versus New York law, and the age of consent regarding a specific witness.
DOJ-OGR-00011657.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Mr. Rohrbach and the presiding judge. The conversation centers on the legal definition of 'illegal sexual activity' within an indictment, specifically whether events in New Mexico and the intent for activity in New York satisfy the requirements of the Mann Act for conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'. The judge expresses concern about potential jury confusion over the complex legal points being argued.
DOJ-OGR-00011655.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between the government (represented by Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge. The discussion centers on whether the potential illegality of sexual conduct in New Mexico can be used as evidence for an enticement charge under New York law. The judge expresses skepticism about the government's approach, pointing out that the charges were not filed under New Mexico law and cautioning against confusing the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00011654.jpg
This document is page 33 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the jury must be carefully instructed regarding testimony about 'Accuser 2' and 'Accuser 3' to avoid convicting Maxwell based on 'New Mexico activity' rather than New York law violations. The Court (Judge) acknowledges the need for clarification regarding the 'enticement' charge versus the sexual activity itself.
DOJ-OGR-00011653.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the government's proposed jury instructions are confusing and contrasts them with the defense's position. The argument centers on jurisdiction and the age of consent, specifically regarding 'Accuser 2' and acts committed in New Mexico that were allegedly legal under New Mexico law at the time, versus how they are treated under New York conspiracy law.
DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's decision to overrule objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge cites trial testimony from witnesses named Annie, Jane, Virginia, and Carolyn as evidence supporting the characterization that Maxwell and Epstein isolated minor girls and developed a multi-level recruitment scheme. The scheme allegedly began with Maxwell recruiting Virginia, who then recruited Carolyn, who in turn recruited others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019378.jpg
This document is a biographical article profiling Jeffrey Epstein (circa 2006), detailing his rise from a blue-collar background to immense wealth and high-society connections. It highlights his relationships with figures like Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexner, his acquisition of lavish properties in New York, Palm Beach, and New Mexico, and his donations to scientific research and political campaigns. The article also alludes to legal controversies, including a SEC probe, a Citibank loan default, and his association with Ponzi schemer Steven Hoffenberg.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019376.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping contained within House Oversight records (019376). It details Jeffrey Epstein's political contributions of over $100,000 to prominent Democrats including John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. The article primarily focuses on the Palm Beach police investigation into Epstein, describing his mansion's security (gargoyles, hidden cameras), his powerful connections (Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew), and police surveillance of teenage girls entering the property for alleged sexual favors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019364.jpg
This document is an FBI filing of a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated July 25, 2006. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein for felony solicitation of prostitution, noting he was booked and released on a $3,000 bond. It mentions his properties in Palm Beach, Manhattan, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands, and lists Alan Dershowitz as a friend.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019055.jpg
An FBI FD-302 report documenting an interview with a current employee of Jeffrey Epstein (likely a pilot for NES LLC) conducted on November 27, 2006. The interviewee details Epstein's travel habits between New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, notes that Epstein has not visited Palm Beach since Hurricane Wilma (2005), and identifies accommodations used by flight staff. The employee claims Epstein strictly prohibits alcohol and smoking on his aircraft and states they have never seen women or girls under the age of twenty on the flights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018930.jpg
This document is a press clipping from the House Oversight Committee records describing Jeffrey Epstein's political contributions and the early stages of the criminal investigation against him. It highlights over $100,000 in donations to prominent Democratic politicians (including John Kerry and Hillary Clinton) and details Palm Beach police surveillance of his mansion regarding allegations of sexual activity with minors. The text explicitly links Epstein to powerful friends including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022051.jpg
This document is an excerpt (Chapter 64) containing a legal declaration by Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed on January 19, 2015. It details allegations that she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz for sex starting when she was 16 years old. The text lists specific locations for these encounters including New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, the Virgin Islands, and Epstein's plane, and mentions her attempt to escape via a trip to Thailand.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022025.jpg
The document describes an attempt by Rodriguez to sell stolen information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, including lists of underage girls and famous contacts, to a lawyer for $50,000. The lawyer contacted the FBI, leading to a sting operation where Rodriguez met an undercover agent, admitted to possessing the stolen items, and was subsequently detained.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021985.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich' or similar investigative work) included in a House Oversight file. It details the lifestyle of Jeffrey Epstein, his travel habits, and the high-profile nature of his parties in New York. Specifically, it focuses on Nadia Marcinkova, describing her as a girlfriend of Epstein and alleging, based on Palm Beach police statements, that she was a willing accomplice in the sexual assault of underage females. The partial text on the left page references Jean-Luc Brunel and legal motions filed in 2015 regarding depositions and his association with Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017730.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017728.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017971.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, primarily from Virginia Roberts' affidavit. It covers alleged sexual encounters, denials from those accused, legal actions including defamation lawsuits and settlements, and a brief mention of Epstein's sentencing hearing. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the allegations and the legal aftermath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017968.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article, filed as a court exhibit, detailing Virginia Roberts' (Giuffre) allegations regarding her recruitment by Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago and subsequent trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes how Roberts was groomed, forced to recruit other girls, and trafficked to powerful figures for the purpose of blackmail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017942.jpg
This document is page 8 of a civil complaint filed on April 16, 2019, involving Plaintiff Roberts (Giuffre) and Defendant Alan Dershowitz. It outlines factual allegations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, stating that Roberts was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein while under 18 and abused between 2000 and 2002 at various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. The document also lists residential addresses for both Dershowitz and Epstein in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017814.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article from April 2019, filed as an exhibit in a House Oversight committee record. It details the legal battle between the Miami Herald and Ghislaine Maxwell regarding sealed court documents, mentions Epstein's cooperation with the FBI ('valuable consideration'), and describes his lifestyle and sex offender registration status across different states. It includes quotes from Maxwell's lawyer attacking Virginia Roberts' credibility and a former prosecutor questioning Epstein's lenient treatment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017805.jpg
This document is a court filing containing a printout of a Miami Herald article detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text describes how Roberts was recruited as a teenager at Mar-a-Lago, groomed for sexual purposes, trafficked to various locations, and allegedly used as part of a blackmail scheme involving powerful figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017801.jpg
This document is a printout of a November 2018 Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case and marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp. The article details Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 sentencing, where despite facing a potential federal life sentence for abusing underage girls, he received a lenient 18-month state sentence due to a non-prosecution agreement signed by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta. It highlights the extraordinary privileges Epstein received during incarceration, including work release for 12 hours a day and a private jail wing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017645.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 874) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critically analyzes the 'Advisory Committee's' narrow interpretation of the Act, contrasting it with the broad legislative intent expressed by Senators Kyl and Feinstein to ensure victims are treated with fairness and due process. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee from the files of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein, likely relevant to arguments regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027832.jpg
This document is a message log from June 29, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. They discuss watching a 'Masterpiece' and coordinate a travel itinerary involving the 'Island' (July 8), Paris (July 16-30), and the New Mexico ranch (August). This correspondence occurred just one week prior to Epstein's arrest on July 6, 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity