| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Parse
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peter Skinner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wayne A. Reaud
|
Geographic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Altorelli
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Estate
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Cunningham
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel H. Weiner
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-13 | N/A | Cooley LLP announced hiring of former NY federal prosecutor. | New York | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Extended deadline for the 'Negotiation Period'. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Deadline of extended Negotiation Period. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-08 | N/A | Date of a public statement made by Blackfords/Prince Andrew's team regarding cooperation, which S... | Public Statement | View |
| 2020-05-04 | N/A | Nixon Peabody confirmed cancellation of summer program. | USA | View |
| 2019-10-01 | N/A | Filing of Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) 2019-43693 regarding persons associated with Jeffrey E... | New York | View |
An email chain from July 16, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP. Weinstein requests a call with a redacted recipient to provide an update on Epstein's New York property. The recipient replies confirming the proposed time works.
This document is an email chain dated July 8, 2020, involving a Partner and Chair of White Collar Defense at the law firm Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP. The participants are scheduling a call regarding the 'Epstein estate'. The specific identities of the senders and recipients are redacted.
An email exchange dated November 1, 2019, regarding 'Epstein estate subpoenas.' Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP requests a quick chat with redacted recipients before sending discussed documents to give them a 'heads up.' The recipient replies confirming they will call in a moment.
This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome, the lawyer representing Prince Andrew, spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ explicitly requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Bloxsome claims the Prince desires to cooperate, tensions escalate when U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' leading Bloxsome to accuse the DOJ of breaching confidentiality agreements.
This document contains a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (representing Prince Andrew, the Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in July 2020. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding a request for Prince Andrew to sit for a voluntary interview concerning the Epstein investigation. Key points of contention include the confidentiality of the proceedings, allegations of media leaks by US officials (specifically Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss), and the legal mechanisms of the interview (voluntary vs. compelled via MLAT). The SDNY proposes a two-week confidential negotiation period to resolve the impasse.
This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.
This document is an email chain from September and October 2020 between Marc A. Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The SDNY requested a specific deposition transcript from a 2009 lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein involving a plaintiff represented by Jack Scarola. Weinstein coordinated with Scarola to ensure there were no protective orders preventing disclosure before providing the transcript to the SDNY on behalf of the Epstein Estate.
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, legal counsel for Prince Andrew, in January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While Prince Andrew's lawyers claim he desires to cooperate, they delay the interview to handle 'preliminary issues,' leading to public tension when US Attorney Geoffrey Berman tells the press there has been 'zero co-operation,' provoking an angry rebuttal from Blackfords.
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
This document contains email correspondence between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP regarding a cooperating witness (Mr. [Redacted]). The emails arrange proffer interviews via WebEx and discuss the witness's potential testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in November 2021. Key topics of interest for the prosecution include Epstein's relationship with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, specifically whether Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP agents in exchange for bypassing standard immigration processing for himself and his guests.
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Glen McGorty (Crowell & Moring) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), spanning October 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of 'proffer' interviews for a witness (Mr. [Redacted]) who is cooperating with the government's investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. Key topics of the interviews include the witness's knowledge of Epstein's interactions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees in the Virgin Islands, specifically regarding favors, bypassing customs processing, and trips to Epstein's island. The emails also confirm the witness's willingness to testify at Ms. Maxwell's trial.
This document is an email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Gary Bloxsome, a partner at Blackfords LLP in London, dating from July 28 to August 10, 2020. The correspondence details negotiations for a 'voluntary interview' (proffer) of Bloxsome's unnamed client regarding the client's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on communications and knowledge of sexual activity with women or girls. Key points of negotiation include the scope of immunity (SDNY offering limited use immunity versus the broader protections of an MLAT compelled interview) and the specific legal ramifications of providing false statements under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
An email from Daniel Cundy (Blackfords LLP) dated August 9, 2020, providing legal reference materials following a phone call. The email attaches extracts regarding Financial Conduct Authority procedures and criminal law fraud procedures. The text discusses legal protections regarding compulsory powers in MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) requests, citing *United States v. Allen* and *Kastigar v. United States* (protection against self-incrimination).
This document contains an email chain between Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (representing the Epstein Estate) and officials at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) from January 24-27, 2020. The correspondence primarily concerns the production of documents related to Epstein's prior trusts and wills in response to a Grand Jury subpoena, specifically referencing Bates numbers GJ_000198 through GJ_000459. Additionally, the emails discuss the US Virgin Islands Attorney General's motion to intervene in the estate administration and a clarification regarding a public announcement involving 'Geoff' and state look-back civil suit laws.
Attorney Robert Lewis emails prosecutors in the Epstein case to inform them that New York Times reporter Mike McIntire is aggressively pursuing his client, a potential witness and former employee. Lewis notes that the reporter claims Epstein's flight logs contradict the client's deposition testimony in the Maxwell case. Lewis asserts that Epstein's flight documentation is 'incomplete, if not materially inaccurate' and mentions his client destroyed personal documents pursuant to a prior settlement agreement.
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between Marc Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request for a 2009 deposition transcript of a plaintiff represented by attorney Jack Scarola in a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Weinstein coordinates with the SDNY and Scarola to ensure no protective orders prevent the disclosure before ultimately providing the transcripts.
This document is a series of emails between Glen McGorty (Crowell & Moring LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding scheduling and preparation for WebEx interviews/proffers with a client (name redacted). The emails discuss logistics, executed proffer agreements, and specific topics the FBI intends to cover, including interactions with CBP employees in the Virgin Islands and Jeffrey Epstein. Key dates mentioned range from October to November 2020.
An email dated November 9, 2020, from Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP to a redacted recipient, copied to Andrew Tomback. The email concerns warranty deeds filed for Epstein's Palm Beach and New Mexico properties, which the sender states they believe to be fabricated.
This document is an email chain from October and November 2020 between Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys (representing a redacted witness) and the SDNY US Attorney's Office. The correspondence coordinates a second proffer interview for the witness, scheduled for November 12, 2020, which will include FBI agents. The focus of the interview is specifically on the witness's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, including whether CBP employees helped Epstein avoid standard entry processing and if Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP staff. A specific CBP employee in St. Thomas is mentioned as having the witness listed in their phone contacts.
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Jill Greenfield of the law firm Fieldfisher and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a call and the preparation for an interview with a client of Greenfield's who is a potential witness/victim in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDNY attorney provides a specific list of seven question categories to guide Greenfield's discussion with her client, covering topics such as the client's background, recruitment, employment duties, travel, specific instances of sexual abuse by Epstein or Maxwell, knowledge of other underage victims, and any contact from the accused during federal investigations.
This document is an email chain from April 15, 2019, between Peter Skinner (likely representing Boies Schiller Flexner) and a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor). The correspondence concerns a Grand Jury subpoena served on BSF regarding the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The redacted sender provides a sealed order granting BSF permission to turn over 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery materials to the Grand Jury, while explicitly noting this order does not apply to the 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein' litigation.
This document is an email chain from July 16, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and recipients identified as Alex, Alison, and Maurene. The discussion concerns scheduling a call to provide an update on the 'Epstein NY property' likely related to the administration or sale of the estate following Jeffrey Epstein's death.
This email thread from December 2019 is between a government official (Alex) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). They discuss the logistics of providing search warrant returns/inventories from the 'now-defunct criminal case' to the estate trustees, specifically regarding properties in New York and the island. The emails also coordinate a future meeting to discuss resolving the government's potential forfeiture claims against the estate.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity