Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror judge |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50’s counsel
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50's mother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror 50's stepbrother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Spodek
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 gave press interviews after the verdict, stating he was a survivor of child sexual abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 interview with Daily Mail. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations in US v. Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations and Verdict | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 filling out the juror questionnaire. | Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Juror 50. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 voir dire/questionnaire completion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Limited Hearing | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deliberations | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial completion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding false testimony by Juror 50 | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing where Juror 50 may be a witness | The Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing on potential juror misconduct regarding Juror 50. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rule 33 Motion Ruling | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voir dire process where Juror 50 allegedly omitted information. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 gave interviews admitting identification with witnesses. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding Juror 50. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 Motion to Intervene | US District Court SDNY | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed information. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50's experience of being sexually abused | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The trial for which the juror is being screened, requiring attendance from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. | Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020966.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing a motion regarding Juror 50's conduct. The Court concludes that Juror 50's failure to disclose sexual abuse history on his questionnaire was inadvertent rather than intentional deception. Furthermore, applying the 'McDonough' legal standard, the Court determines that even if the juror had answered accurately, he would not have been struck for cause, as evidenced by his credible responses during a post-trial hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00020965.jpg
This document is a page from a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) addressing the conduct of 'Juror 50.' The text analyzes whether Juror 50 intended to deceive the court by not disclosing his history of sexual abuse on a questionnaire in November 2021, despite discussing it in media interviews in January 2022. The Court considers his explanation that watching the victims testify inspired him to speak out, and that he believed using only his first name in interviews would maintain his anonymity among friends and family.
DOJ-OGR-00020964.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing post-trial arguments by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) regarding Juror 50. The Court analyzes whether Juror 50 was dishonest about his sexual abuse history, noting that while he claimed he rarely disclosed it, he later gave media interviews and contacted witness Annie Farmer. The Court recounts Juror 50's explanation that he did not believe his family or friends would discover his abuse despite the media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00020963.jpg
This page is from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 1, 2022, addressing arguments by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) regarding Juror 50. The Court analyzes Juror 50's failure to disclose sexual abuse by a stepbrother on his jury questionnaire (Questions 48 and 49). The Court finds Juror 50's explanation—that he skimmed the questionnaire and did not consider his abuser to be 'family' at the time—to be credible and not an act of deliberate concealment.
DOJ-OGR-00020962.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding a challenge to the credibility of a juror, identified as Juror 50. The defendant, Maxwell, argued the juror's testimony was "self-serving" and "rehearsed," and that his explanation for an incorrect answer on a questionnaire was not plausible. The Court rejects these arguments, finding the juror's preparation for testimony to be reasonable and his explanation for the questionnaire error credible, ultimately expressing satisfaction with his answers.
DOJ-OGR-00020961.jpg
This legal document details a court's analysis of whether a juror, identified as Juror 50, intentionally provided false answers on a jury questionnaire regarding his own history of sexual abuse. The Court finds Juror 50's explanation—that it was an inadvertent mistake he only realized during a post-trial interview with the Daily Mail—to be credible and more logical than the Defendant's claim of perjury. The court is not persuaded by the Defendant's arguments and appears to be ruling in favor of the juror's credibility.
DOJ-OGR-00020960.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes the testimony of a prospective juror, Juror 50. It argues that the juror was distracted by a recent romantic breakup and the busy environment of the courthouse, which affected his focus while completing the jury questionnaire. The document asserts that the juror's personal history of sexual abuse was not a primary consideration for him at the time, and that he did not believe he would be selected for the jury anyway.
DOJ-OGR-00020959.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court ruling in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), addressing potential juror misconduct. The Court analyzes Juror 50's failure to disclose past sexual abuse on a questionnaire, concluding that the errors were not deliberate but rather the result of rushing and carelessness. The judge credits Juror 50's testimony, citing his calm demeanor, consistency, and the fact that he testified under a grant of immunity with the threat of perjury.
DOJ-OGR-00020954.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the Court's assessment of 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during voir dire; the juror testified that this history did not affect his impartiality. The document also notes the denial of a defense request to stay the ruling pending the release of a documentary featuring said juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020953.jpg
This document is a court order from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330) detailing the testimony of 'Juror 50' regarding inaccuracies in his jury questionnaire. Juror 50 admitted to being a victim of childhood sexual abuse by a stepbrother but claimed his failure to disclose this was an inadvertent mistake caused by rushing, distraction, and misunderstanding the questions. The text outlines his justifications, including technical issues, a recent breakup, and a belief that the sheer volume of jurors made his specific answers less critical.
DOJ-OGR-00020951.jpg
This legal document details post-verdict issues in a criminal case where the defendant was found guilty. A week after the verdict, the Government notified the Court that a juror, identified as Juror 50, gave press interviews claiming to be a victim of sexual abuse, a fact he had denied on his jury questionnaire. The Government requested a hearing on the matter, which the Defendant subsequently opposed in a letter to the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020946.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court order (Document 653) filed on April 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's finding that 'Juror 50' did not deliberately provide false testimony on his jury questionnaire but rather rushed through it carelessly. The Court concludes that Juror 50 was not biased, can serve impartially despite being a survivor of sexual abuse, and would not have been struck for cause even if he had disclosed his history accurately.
DOJ-OGR-00020943.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, identified as page 29 of Document 638 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. It contains a handwritten note identifying "Juror ID: 50" on an otherwise blank, lined page. The page also includes header information for another case, 22-1426, and a Department of Justice document identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00020941.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a juror questionnaire or notes page, identified as page 27 of 29 in Document 638 from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The page is mostly blank ruled lines but contains a handwritten notation identifying "Juror ID: 50". The header also references another case, 22-1426, and the footer includes a Department of Justice Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00020938.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, identified as being completed by Juror 50. The document was filed on March 9, 2022. In response to the final question, the juror indicated that they do not wish for any of their answers to be kept confidential from the Judge, counsel, or the Defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020935.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The prospective juror, identified as Juror 50, indicates that neither they nor a family member have ever been involved in activism related to sex trafficking or similar crimes. The juror also states they would have no difficulty assessing the credibility of a law enforcement witness fairly.
DOJ-OGR-00020934.jpg
This document is a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed as part of a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on March 9, 2022. The juror answers questions about their ability to remain impartial in a trial involving sex crimes against underage girls, laws about sexual consent, and federal sex trafficking laws. In all instances, the juror indicates that these factors would not prevent them from being a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020932.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire from a legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 indicates they have not formed an opinion about Ms. Maxwell that would impede impartiality, but they have heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN, specifically regarding his death and that he was in jail awaiting trial. The juror denies ever publicly stating or posting opinions about either individual.
DOJ-OGR-00020931.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire for a case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 indicates they have previously heard of Ms. Maxwell from CNN.com, recalling that she was Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriend. The juror states they have not formed an opinion on Ms. Maxwell's guilt or innocence.
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020928.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The prospective juror denies having any association with the NYPD and states they have no opinion of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, or former Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss that would impede their ability to be a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020927.jpg
This document is page 15 of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The juror indicates they have no professional, business, or social association with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00020926.jpg
This document is page 12 of a juror questionnaire from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 indicates they have not had monetary disputes with the government and do not have close relations working in law enforcement or the justice system, suggesting they can serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020925.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire, identified as Juror ID 50, from a legal case filed on March 9, 2022. The juror denies that they or any close relations have ever been the subject of an investigation, a victim of a crime, or a party to a legal dispute with the United States government or its agencies, including the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00020924.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire, identified as Juror ID 50, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and filed on March 9, 2022. The potential juror indicates that neither they nor any close relations have ever been subpoenaed for an investigation or arrested/charged with a crime.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Court Order
Order directing an inquiry into Juror 50.
Jury Service
Juror 50 discussed the questionnaire, stating he 'flew through' it and didn't recall the sexual abuse question.
Guidance regarding media statements
Juror 50 called the Jury Department asking for guidance due to statements he had given to media outlets, inquiring if he needed an attorney and if he could get a copy of his questionnaire.
Jury service and questionnaire
Reuters interviewed Juror 50 on or about January 5, 2022, where he discussed his jury service and stated he 'flew through' the questionnaire and did not recall being asked about personal experiences with sexual abuse.
Juror 50's past sexual abuse
Juror 50 gave interviews to The Independent and The Daily Mail stating that he was sexually abused as a minor, which contradicted his answer on a juror questionnaire.
Request for guidance regarding media statements
Juror asked for guidance regarding statements given to media and if he needed an attorney.
Response to inquiry
Informed juror the Court could not provide guidance or access to the questionnaire.
Post-trial statements
Juror 50 stated that he was sexually abused as a minor.
Request for guidance/attorney
Juror 50 asked for guidance regarding media statements and inquired if he needed an attorney.
Response to inquiry
Informed Juror 50 the Court could not provide guidance or his questionnaire.
Ghislaine Maxwell Juror Breaks Silence To The Independent...
Juror 50 stated that memories of abuse can be 'replayed like a video' and discussed the verdict.
Post-trial interview
Juror 50 discussed his experience and abuse history without using his full name.
N/A
Juror 50 thanked Farmer for sharing her story.
Comment on a post about sharing a story
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post, calling her 'brave enough to come forward' and 'thank[ing] her for sharing her[] [story] as well.' He explained he had 'randomly seen' the post and 'felt like [he] wanted to comment.'
Post-verdict interview
Juror stated he was a survivor of child sexual abuse.
Social Media Usage
Statement regarding deleting social media due to a breakup.
Voir Dire
During oral voir dire, Juror 50 affirmed he could be fair and impartial and follow the Court's instructions.
Voir Dire
During oral voir dire, Juror 50 affirmed he could be fair and impartial and follow the Court's instructions.
Voir Dire
Juror 50 stated he used social media but had deleted apps due to a relationship breakup.
Voir Dire
Juror confirmed he could decide the case based on facts and evidence.
Voir Dire
Juror 50 stated he 'just got out of a relationship and I didn’t want to see anything regarding them'.
Jury Questionnaire
Juror 50 filled out the questionnaire, admittedly 'flying through' it.
Question 49
Juror 50 answered a question regarding his history, which the court notes he did not read closely.
Personal experience with sexual abuse
After the verdict, Juror 50 gave interviews to the media where he allegedly discussed his personal experience(s) with sexual abuse.
Juror's personal history of abuse
Following the verdict, Juror 50 gave press interviews in which he stated that he was a survivor of child sexual abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity