| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USAFLS)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Adversarial professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional informant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-06-20 | N/A | Planned meeting between FBI agent and USAFLS attorney at 10:30. | West Palm Beach, FL (Implied) | View |
An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.
Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated May 27, 2008. The correspondence discusses Jeffrey Epstein's attempt to negotiate for less jail time than the agreed 18 months. The prosecutors note that the original deal was for 2 years, that he has already received a 'big break,' and crucially state that they have identified more victims since the agreement was made. A figure named 'Alex' is mentioned as being firm on not negotiating further.
This document is an email thread from May 27, 2008, between officials at the USAFLS (US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that Epstein was requesting less jail time, but officials (referencing 'Alex') were firm on not negotiating further, noting that the deal had already been reduced from 2 years to 18 months and that they had identified more victims since the agreement.
An email chain from June 19, 2008, between the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The chain begins with attorney Brad Edwards offering to share information and meet with prosecutors. The government officials discuss Edwards' credibility, coordinate a meeting time, and discuss the status of the investigation, including waiting for a 'green light' from Washington D.C. and pressure from the Deputy Attorney General's office for an answer by Friday. They also mention interactions with defense attorney Roy Black.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
Explaining he is in the mountains with bad cell service, will find landline at 4 to call.
Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? Please let me know what time works best for you.
Sounds good
I am out of town. What is it about?
Asking if Roy is available to discuss the Epstein matter that afternoon.
Clarifying the topic: 'Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement.'
FYI -- I was going to respond that it relates to the performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. What do you think?
Thanks. Did you finish the letter to Tein?
FYI. This came out this morning. Includes link to NY Post article about Epstein plea.
Yes. Sorry, I forgot to scan it in. It went to Tein and Goldberger on Friday.
Discussion regarding Epstein's lawyers failing to respond to service in 4 federal suits, potentially risking $200 million in default judgments.
Automated read receipt indicating the recipient opened an email titled 'RE: Epstein's Court Filings'.
Subject line indicates a read receipt or notification regarding a PDF document titled 'Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act.pdf re Epstein'. Marked High Importance and Urgent Priority.
Detailed report on conversations with victims' lawyer regarding the plea deal and a meeting with the Sheriff's office regarding jail conditions and work release.
I will get you the names tomorrow. Thanks. Spencer, please see me.
I will do so. Look forward to hearing from you.
Providing email address and contact information; thanking Ted for assistance.
Thanks
Thanks [REDACTED]. I will get back to you. p.s., Tell [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] hello for me. Both are good friends for mine.
Dear Ted: Here is my e-mail address and contact information. Thank you for your assistance.
Email containing attachment 'GRAND_JURY_PRESENTATION_PART_III.docx'. The body of the email is redacted.
Email containing attachment 'Principal_Submission.pdf'. Importance marked as Normal.
Notes the volume of material dropped on him and suggests waiting until Monday to call Lefkowitz.
fyi
Pls print
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity