[Redacted] (USAFLS)

Person
Mentions
12
Relationships
6
Events
1
Documents
6

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
6 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Alex Acosta
Business associate
3
3
View
person Roy Black
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jay Lefkowitz
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (USAFLS)
Business associate
1
1
View
person Roy Black
Adversarial professional
1
1
View
person BRAD EDWARDS
Professional informant
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2008-06-20 N/A Planned meeting between FBI agent and USAFLS attorney at 10:30. West Palm Beach, FL (Implied) View

EFTA00014128.pdf

An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00014067.pdf

Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00013920.pdf

This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated May 27, 2008. The correspondence discusses Jeffrey Epstein's attempt to negotiate for less jail time than the agreed 18 months. The prosecutors note that the original deal was for 2 years, that he has already received a 'big break,' and crucially state that they have identified more victims since the agreement was made. A figure named 'Alex' is mentioned as being firm on not negotiating further.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00013919.pdf

This document is an email thread from May 27, 2008, between officials at the USAFLS (US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that Epstein was requesting less jail time, but officials (referencing 'Alex') were firm on not negotiating further, noting that the deal had already been reduced from 2 years to 18 months and that they had identified more victims since the agreement.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00013871.pdf

An email chain from June 19, 2008, between the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The chain begins with attorney Brad Edwards offering to share information and meet with prosecutors. The government officials discuss Edwards' credibility, coordinate a meeting time, and discuss the status of the investigation, including waiting for a 'green light' from Washington D.C. and pressure from the Deputy Attorney General's office for an answer by Friday. They also mention interactions with defense attorney Roy Black.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00013619.pdf

This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
72
As Recipient
66
Total
138

Re: Jeffrey Epstein

From: Roy Black
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Explaining he is in the mountains with bad cell service, will find landline at 4 to call.

Email
2008-07-30

Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Roy Black

Dear Roy: Are you available this afternoon to discuss the Epstein matter? Please let me know what time works best for you.

Email
2008-07-30

RE: Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Sounds good

Email
2008-07-30

Re: Jeffrey Epstein

From: Roy Black
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

I am out of town. What is it about?

Email
2008-07-30

Re: Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Roy Black

Asking if Roy is available to discuss the Epstein matter that afternoon.

Email
2008-07-30

RE: Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Roy Black

Clarifying the topic: 'Hi Roy -- It relates to the performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement.'

Email
2008-07-30

FW: Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

FYI -- I was going to respond that it relates to the performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. What do you think?

Email
2008-07-30

RE: New York Post

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Thanks. Did you finish the letter to Tein?

Email
2008-07-21

New York Post

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

FYI. This came out this morning. Includes link to NY Post article about Epstein plea.

Email
2008-07-21

RE: New York Post

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Yes. Sorry, I forgot to scan it in. It went to Tein and Goldberger on Friday.

Email
2008-07-21

Funny epstein story

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Discussion regarding Epstein's lawyers failing to respond to service in 4 federal suits, potentially risking $200 million in default judgments.

Email
2008-07-17

Read: RE: Epstein's Court Filings

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [REDACTED]

Automated read receipt indicating the recipient opened an email titled 'RE: Epstein's Court Filings'.

Email read receipt
2008-07-17

Read: Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights A...

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Unknown (Recipients no...

Subject line indicates a read receipt or notification regarding a PDF document titled 'Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act.pdf re Epstein'. Marked High Importance and Urgent Priority.

Email
2008-07-07

Epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Detailed report on conversations with victims' lawyer regarding the plea deal and a meeting with the Sheriff's office regarding jail conditions and work release.

Email
2008-07-03

RE: Epstein Investigation

From: Ted
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

I will get you the names tomorrow. Thanks. Spencer, please see me.

Email
2008-07-02

RE: Epstein Investigation

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Ted

I will do so. Look forward to hearing from you.

Email
2008-06-30

Epstein Investigation

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Ted

Providing email address and contact information; thanking Ted for assistance.

Email
2008-06-30

RE: Epstein Investigation

From: Ted
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Thanks

Email
2008-06-30

RE: Epstein Investigation

From: Ted
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Thanks [REDACTED]. I will get back to you. p.s., Tell [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] hello for me. Both are good friends for mine.

Email
2008-06-30

Epstein Investigation

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Ted

Dear Ted: Here is my e-mail address and contact information. Thank you for your assistance.

Email
2008-06-30

<no subject>

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Email containing attachment 'GRAND_JURY_PRESENTATION_PART_III.docx'. The body of the email is redacted.

Email
2008-06-29

epstein

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Email containing attachment 'Principal_Submission.pdf'. Importance marked as Normal.

Email
2008-06-26

FW: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star

From: John Roth (ODAG)
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Notes the volume of material dropped on him and suggests waiting until Monday to call Lefkowitz.

Email
2008-06-20

FW: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star

From: [Redacted] (USAFLS)
To: Alex Acosta

fyi

Email
2008-06-20

FW: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star

From: Alex Acosta
To: [Redacted] (USAFLS)

Pls print

Email
2008-06-20

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity