| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USAFLS)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Adversarial professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional informant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-06-20 | N/A | Planned meeting between FBI agent and USAFLS attorney at 10:30. | West Palm Beach, FL (Implied) | View |
An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.
Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated May 27, 2008. The correspondence discusses Jeffrey Epstein's attempt to negotiate for less jail time than the agreed 18 months. The prosecutors note that the original deal was for 2 years, that he has already received a 'big break,' and crucially state that they have identified more victims since the agreement was made. A figure named 'Alex' is mentioned as being firm on not negotiating further.
This document is an email thread from May 27, 2008, between officials at the USAFLS (US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that Epstein was requesting less jail time, but officials (referencing 'Alex') were firm on not negotiating further, noting that the deal had already been reduced from 2 years to 18 months and that they had identified more victims since the agreement.
An email chain from June 19, 2008, between the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The chain begins with attorney Brad Edwards offering to share information and meet with prosecutors. The government officials discuss Edwards' credibility, coordinate a meeting time, and discuss the status of the investigation, including waiting for a 'green light' from Washington D.C. and pressure from the Deputy Attorney General's office for an answer by Friday. They also mention interactions with defense attorney Roy Black.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
Discussion regarding Epstein's belief that Jan 4th is the plea/sentencing date, not Dec 16th. Expecting clarity from Judge Davis.
Clarification that December 14th is a Friday and the 16th is a Sunday.
Confirming that the Court will handle plea and sentencing on Jan 4 for agreed-upon counts.
Sender provides the 'latest and hopefully final version' of a letter addressed to Judge Davis.
Internal discussion clarifying intention to assign decision to select lawyer to Judge Davis, not for him to represent the girls directly.
Stating Judge Davis issue is a non-starter. Discussing concessions on letter language regarding firm size, 150k limit, and testing victim claims.
Asking why Judge Davis is a 'non-starter' and stating understanding he was willing to serve.
Clarifying intention to assign decision to select lawyer to Judge Davis, not for him to represent girls personally.
Lefkowitz responding that he will review materials. Questions why Judge Davis is a 'non-starter' as attorney representative.
Forwarding email chain with 'Fyi'.
Detailed response listing concessions made regarding the letter to Judge Davis (removing paragraph 4, adding footnote re: 150k limit, modifying discovery language). States 'Judge Davis issue is a non-starter'. Demands deal by COB next day.
Lefkowitz raising concerns about the draft language: prefers Judge Davis to represent women directly, objects to requirement for large firm for multiple trials, discusses 150k vs 50k limit, insists on discovery to test 'alleged victims' claims.
Raising concerns about draft language: prefers Judge Davis to represent women, objects to firm size requirement, discusses 150k vs 50k limit, wants discovery to test victim claims.
Asking for confirmation that the date change will not affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
Confirming the change of plea will take place on November 20.
Discussing that Jay Lefkowitz's availability shouldn't dictate the plea date and asking to confirm the date change won't affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
Confirming the change of plea will take place on November 20.
Confirming 'That is correct' (regarding the sentence start date not being affected).
Sending proposed letter to special master (attachment: 071015 Special Master Letter2.wpd).
Requesting time to speak.
Counter-proposal regarding the settlement language, specifically removing a clause restricting communication with the third party.
Proposed draft language for the settlement agreement regarding the appointment of independent third-party attorneys.
Discussing a draft letter to Judge Davis and confirming the 'final number of victims'.
Forwarding a proposed letter to Judge Davis for review.
Providing revised Paragraph 1 language after speaking with Alex Acosta.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity