| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USAFLS)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Adversarial professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional informant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-06-20 | N/A | Planned meeting between FBI agent and USAFLS attorney at 10:30. | West Palm Beach, FL (Implied) | View |
An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.
Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated May 27, 2008. The correspondence discusses Jeffrey Epstein's attempt to negotiate for less jail time than the agreed 18 months. The prosecutors note that the original deal was for 2 years, that he has already received a 'big break,' and crucially state that they have identified more victims since the agreement was made. A figure named 'Alex' is mentioned as being firm on not negotiating further.
This document is an email thread from May 27, 2008, between officials at the USAFLS (US Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida) regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that Epstein was requesting less jail time, but officials (referencing 'Alex') were firm on not negotiating further, noting that the deal had already been reduced from 2 years to 18 months and that they had identified more victims since the agreement.
An email chain from June 19, 2008, between the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The chain begins with attorney Brad Edwards offering to share information and meet with prosecutors. The government officials discuss Edwards' credibility, coordinate a meeting time, and discuss the status of the investigation, including waiting for a 'green light' from Washington D.C. and pressure from the Deputy Attorney General's office for an answer by Friday. They also mention interactions with defense attorney Roy Black.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 16-22, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted prosecutor. The correspondence details negotiations regarding a letter to 'Judge Davis' (a proposed special master) concerning the selection of legal representation for Epstein's victims. Key points of contention include whether Judge Davis would represent the victims directly, the criteria for the selected law firm, statutory compensation limits ($150k vs $50k), and the inclusion of language regarding discovery to test the veracity of victims' claims.
Forwards Edwards' email. Describes Edwards as a 'very good guy' but notes concern about allegations of misconduct. Suggests meeting him.
Confirms meeting time. Discusses Roy Black not calling back directly. Mentions pressure from DAG's chief of staff for an answer by Friday.
Proposes meeting tomorrow at 10:30 after getting a report. Mentions sending 'SW' (likely Search Warrant). Discusses waiting for 'green light' from DC and comments on Roy Black.
Edwards requests a meeting to share information and concerns. States he will be in the area meeting a client next week.
Spoke with [Redacted] Everyone is good for 10:00 this Friday morning. [Redacted] will be calling [Redacted] office
Absolutely, I'm available from 10 to 11 and after 11 have a conflict.
I'm available anytime
Update on victim interview, US Atty Gen visit, and Acosta presenting to DAG.
Reporting that Epstein wants to do less time; mentions original deal was 2 years, current agreement is 18 months, and new victims have been identified.
Discussion regarding an indictment meeting and stating that 'Alex' and the sender are not negotiating with Epstein anymore.
Detailed legal arguments regarding SOL, victims getting older, expiring grand jury, and need for swift justice.
Request for arguments to present to DAG against further delay.
Discussion of Epstein wanting less time (18 months vs 2 years) and identification of new victims.
Perfect. Enjoy your trip. We're in good shape (so far).
Confirming return on Saturday and meeting on Monday by 10:00.
Discussing meeting about the indictment. States '[Redacted] and Alex have been very clear that we are not negotiating with this guy any more in any way.'
Discusses Epstein wanting to do less time. Notes original deal was 2 years, reduced to 18 months, and that they have 'identified more victims'.
Note about being at sea with bad reception, heading to Berlin.
Notification that a victim's mother has filed a motion to intervene and stay civil proceedings against Epstein until the victim's 18th birthday, citing estrangement from the father who filed the suit.
Sender provides attachments of press coverage documents and discusses the release of PC affidavits after the State Attorney's Office shut down the case and the Chief deemed the investigation closed.
Sender apologizes for delay and states that [Redacted] will confer with Lanna about the facts she requested.
Request for recipient to call Judge Davis as soon as possible.
Strong objection to the government sending a notification letter to alleged victims; argues it violates the spirit of negotiations and legal statutes (Justice for All Act vs Section 2255); accepts selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg.
Requesting to send Jay (Lefkowitz) the proposed letter and redact names.
Insisting on concluding the vetting process for Podhurst and Josephsberg; stating statutory obligation to notify victims under Justice for All Act; setting deadline for objection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity