Annie Farmer

Person
Mentions
309
Relationships
111
Events
133
Documents
149

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
111 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Sigrid S. McCawley
Client
10 Very Strong
4
View
person Maria
Friend
9 Strong
4
View
person Maria Farmer
Friend
9 Strong
5
View
person Juror 50
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Victim abuser
8 Strong
3
View
person Juror No. 50
Communication
8 Strong
3
View
person Epstein
Acquaintance
8 Strong
3
View
person Sigrid McCawley
Client
7
3
View
person David Boies
Client
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim perpetrator
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Victim perpetrator
7
3
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim accused
6
2
View
person MAXWELL
Acquaintance
6
2
View
person Juror No. 50
Social media interaction
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
6
2
View
person MAXWELL
Abuser victim
6
2
View
person Maria Farmer
Siblings
6
2
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Abuser victim
6
1
View
person MAXWELL
Victim perpetrator
6
2
View
person Juror 50
Juror witness interaction
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Annie Farmer's sister
Family
6
1
View
person defendant
Accused of sexual abuse
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Trial A trial was held where Annie Farmer and 'Kate' testified. Virginia Giuffre did not testify. N/A View
N/A Interaction Multiple individuals allegedly interacted with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during the period of charg... N/A View
N/A Crimes/abuse Crimes committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein against Annie Farmer. New Mexico View
N/A Crime Ghislaine Maxwell sexually abused Annie Farmer when she was a child and procured other girls for ... N/A View
N/A Alleged incident Alleged physical contact occurred between Annie Farmer, Mr. Epstein, and Ms. Maxwell. New Mexico View
N/A Testimony Annie Farmer testified in court. Court View
N/A Trip Annie Farmer traveled to New York after Epstein purchased a ticket for her. New York View
N/A Discussions/interviews Annie Farmer describing the crimes to law enforcement and the media. N/A View
N/A Travel Annie Farmer went to New Mexico. New Mexico View
N/A Meeting Witness Annie Farmer met Epstein. New York View
N/A Witness testimony The upcoming testimony of witness Annie Farmer is discussed. It is established that she will not ... Court View
N/A Trial Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, at which Annie Farmer testified. N/A View
N/A Border crossing A record is discussed which reflects an actual border crossing by Annie Farmer in an immigration ... airport View
N/A Legal proceeding A future sentencing hearing where Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present in-person ... N/A View
N/A Meeting Annie Farmer met Jeffrey Epstein for the first time. New York View
N/A Massage Maxwell gave Annie Farmer a massage when she was 16 years old. N/A View
N/A Flight Jeffrey Epstein flew Annie Farmer to New Mexico. New Mexico View
N/A Court testimony Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... courtroom View
N/A Flight Mr. Epstein flew Ms. Farmer to New Mexico. New Mexico View
N/A Social media interaction Juror No. 50 'liked' a tweet by Ms. Farmer and then tweeted a response to her. Twitter View
N/A Disclosure to fbi Annie Farmer told the FBI that her story and the 'money piece' were not sexualized. N/A View
N/A Crime Child sexual abuse experienced by Jane, Carolyn, Kate, and Annie Farmer. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Government's case against Maxwell, which includes allegations of sexual abuse against multipl... N/A View
N/A N/A Annie Farmer sent to New Mexico ranch for an 'academically gifted' retreat. Epstein's ranch in New Mexico View

DOJ-OGR-00021068.jpg

This document, dated February 28, 2023, appears to be a legal filing summarizing trial testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights inconsistencies between trial testimony and pre-trial statements made by accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn' regarding Maxwell's presence and involvement in sexual abuse. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in 2007 FBI interviews or a 2008 lawsuit, despite implicating her at trial.

Court filing / legal brief (review of trial evidence)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020990.jpg

This legal document analyzes two counts from an indictment against an unnamed Defendant. Count Three alleges a conspiracy from 1994-2004 to transport minors across state lines for sexual activity, based on testimony from victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie Farmer. Count Five alleges a conspiracy from 2001-2004 for trafficking individuals for commercial sex acts, based on evidence related to Carolyn and Virginia Roberts. The Defendant argues, and the Court appears to agree, that Count Five is a subset of Count Three.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020966.jpg

This document is page 23 of a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing a motion regarding Juror 50's conduct. The Court concludes that Juror 50's failure to disclose sexual abuse history on his questionnaire was inadvertent rather than intentional deception. Furthermore, applying the 'McDonough' legal standard, the Court determines that even if the juror had answered accurately, he would not have been struck for cause, as evidenced by his credible responses during a post-trial hearing.

Court filing / legal opinion (page 23 of 40)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020965.jpg

This document is a page from a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) addressing the conduct of 'Juror 50.' The text analyzes whether Juror 50 intended to deceive the court by not disclosing his history of sexual abuse on a questionnaire in November 2021, despite discussing it in media interviews in January 2022. The Court considers his explanation that watching the victims testify inspired him to speak out, and that he believed using only his first name in interviews would maintain his anonymity among friends and family.

Court filing / legal opinion (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020964.jpg

This document is page 21 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) addressing post-trial arguments by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) regarding Juror 50. The Court analyzes whether Juror 50 was dishonest about his sexual abuse history, noting that while he claimed he rarely disclosed it, he later gave media interviews and contacted witness Annie Farmer. The Court recounts Juror 50's explanation that he did not believe his family or friends would discover his abuse despite the media attention.

Court order / legal opinion (united states district court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020911.jpg

This document contains pages 43 and 44 of a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023. The text records the questioning of an individual (likely a juror) regarding their social media interactions with witness Annie Farmer and their failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse on a jury questionnaire. The respondent explains they thought the questionnaire did not ask about their 'personal abuse' and admits to making a 'huge mistake' in their interpretation.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020905.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated February 28, 2023, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Everdell are arguing before the Judge that a specific juror (referred to as 'he') demonstrated bias and dishonesty by publicly discussing his own history of sexual abuse and his role in the trial on Facebook and to victim Annie Farmer, despite claiming during selection he didn't want to share that history. The Court agrees to ask the juror to reconcile his claim of privacy with his public media engagement.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020871.jpg

This document appears to be a court exhibit containing excerpts from media interviews (MailOnline, The Independent) with a juror named 'David' following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. David explains that the jury was swayed by the 'pattern' of grooming established by multiple accusers (Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Carolyn), despite the defense's attempts to challenge memories via expert Loftus. He specifically notes that while accuser Kate's testimony could not be used for charges due to UK laws, it was crucial for establishing the grooming methodology.

Court filing / news article excerpt
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.

Court docket sheet / case log (sdny cm/ecf)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020722.jpg

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.

Court docket sheet / case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg

This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.

Court docket / legal case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020475.jpg

This document is a court docket log from June 24-26, 2022, relating to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders permitting victims Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre to make in-person statements at sentencing. The docket also records communications regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials at the MDC, defense motions regarding victim impact statements from Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, and the denial of Maxwell's request to redact victim statements.

Court docket / legal case log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016278.jpg

A court transcript page from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies about reclaiming a pair of boots she had kept at her mother's house after being interviewed by agents in 2006/2007. She also details a six-week service trip to Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996 before the prosecution introduces Government Exhibit 103.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016265.jpg

This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies about her reluctance to go to New Mexico to see Jeffrey Epstein due to a prior incident in a New York movie theater, stating she only felt comfortable going because her mother told her Maxwell (whom she viewed as Epstein's romantic partner) would be present. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, raises a hearsay objection regarding the mother's statement, which the judge overrules with a limiting instruction.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016264.jpg

This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct testimony of Annie Farmer. Farmer describes arriving at a large property in New Mexico (presumed to be Zorro Ranch) characterized by a desert landscape and a western movie set. She testifies to meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell there, describing Maxwell as an attractive woman in her thirties, and subsequently identifies Maxwell in a photograph (Government Exhibit 115).

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016263.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that in the spring of 1996 (likely April), she flew commercially to New Mexico for a weekend trip, noting that she did not pay for the ticket and thanked Jeffrey Epstein for it upon arrival. She describes being met at the airport by a driver holding a sign with her name who drove her to 'the ranch.'

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016244.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of Annie Farmer (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Farmer testifies about a one-week trip to New York after Christmas in 1995, where she stayed with her sister. She confirms meeting Jeffrey Epstein twice during this trip but states she did not meet Ghislaine Maxwell on that specific occasion. The testimony concludes with the introduction of Government Exhibit 101, which Farmer identifies as her high school photo from her junior year.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016239.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Annie Farmer by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer identifies the defendant in the courtroom as a person named Maxwell, who she states gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. She also provides background information, stating she lived in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley, at that time.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002198.jpg

This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.

Legal correspondence / victim statement
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002198(1).jpg

This legal document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan, which includes a statement from Annie Farmer. Farmer, identifying herself as a victim, vehemently opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, characterizing Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who has lived a parasitic lifestyle. The statement argues that releasing Maxwell would prevent justice for her and other victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021756.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was intended to provide broad immunity to co-conspirators. It cites a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report where Epstein's counsel stated Epstein wanted to be the sole person to take blame. The document also notes that at the time of the agreement, the Government believed it lacked specific evidence against individuals like Ms. Maxwell, despite having interviewed accusers.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg

This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on July 27, 2023, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should be considered a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text cites legal precedents regarding plea agreements and asserts that the NPA's immunity for 'potential co-conspirators' extends to Maxwell for offenses between 2001 and 2007. A footnote highlights that Florida investigators interviewed victims Carolyn, Virginia Roberts, and Annie Farmer, establishing an overlap between the Florida investigation and the SDNY trial.

Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021668.jpg

This page from a 2023 court filing details the sexual abuse of two victims, 'Kate' and Annie Farmer. It describes how Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated Epstein's abuse of Kate in Palm Beach by providing a schoolgirl outfit and normalizing the encounter, and how Epstein groomed Annie Farmer at his Manhattan townhouse before she was sent to his New Mexico ranch in 1996.

Court filing / appellate brief (case 22-1426)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021649.jpg

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated June 29, 2023. It outlines the structure of the filing, which includes the government's case detailing the alleged sexual abuse of six individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, and Melissa) and a legal argument regarding whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement bars the prosecution of Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
3 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
3 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Annie Farmer $0.00 Payment for trip to Thailand and Vietnam View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Annie Farmer $0.00 Purchase of a travel ticket (implied flight) fo... View
N/A Received Epstein Victim Co... Annie Farmer $0.00 Claim/Application submitted to the Epstein Vict... View
As Sender
22
As Recipient
25
Total
47

Response to annie farmer

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Farmer

The document states that Juror No. 50 tweeted directly to Ms. Farmer in response, but the content is not provided.

Tweet
N/A

Social meeting

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Annie Farmer

Epstein invited them into his home, served champagne, talked, and asked about her plans.

Meeting
N/A

Public statements

From: Annie Farmer
To: Public/Media

Witness questioned about telling the truth during public interviews.

Interview
N/A

Gratitude for juror's disclosure

From: Annie Farmer
To: ["Public"]

Annie Farmer expressed gratitude for the juror who disclosed his own trauma, for the other women who testified, and for other survivors.

Tweet
N/A

Sharing of an interview with Juror 50

From: Annie Farmer
To: Juror 50

On Twitter, Annie Farmer shared an article that contained an interview with Juror 50.

Social media interaction
N/A

Sharing of an interview with Juror 50

From: Annie Farmer
To: Juror 50

On Twitter, Annie Farmer shared an article that contained an interview with Juror 50.

Social media interaction
N/A

No Subject

From: Scotty
To: Annie Farmer

Thanking Annie Farmer for her bravery and stating her story was critical to the verdict.

Tweet (reply)
N/A

Article sharing

From: Juror (Witness A)
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked Annie Farmer for sharing her story; commented on an article Farmer shared.

Social media comment (twitter)
N/A

Travel to New York

From: Maria Farmer
To: Annie Farmer

Maria told Annie to come to New York.

Verbal instruction
N/A

Article sharing

From: Annie Farmer
To: Public (Twitter)

Farmer shared an article containing an interview with Juror 50.

Social media post
N/A

Telling my story

From: The Juror
To: Annie Farmer

Thanks for telling my story.

Social media post/message
N/A

Trip to New York

From: Maria Farmer
To: Annie Farmer

Maria told Annie that Epstein was interested in helping her with education and purchasing her ticket.

Conversation
N/A

Investigation

From: Florida Investigators
To: Annie Farmer

Investigative interview

Interview
N/A

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Farmer

Direct communication via Twitter.

Social media message
N/A

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked her for sharing her story.

Social media comment
N/A

Trip Funding

From: Annie Farmer
To: Mulligan

Annie told Mulligan that her trip to Thailand was paid for by Jeffrey Epstein.

Conversation
N/A

Possession of boots

From: agents
To: Annie Farmer

Agents asked Farmer if she still had the boots.

Interview
N/A

Unknown

From: Juror No. 50
To: Annie Farmer

Juror No. 50 used Twitter to communicate directly to Annie Farmer.

Social media/direct communication
N/A

Twitter post

From: Annie Farmer
To: public

Referenced in defense memorandum.

Social media
N/A

Unknown

From: The Juror
To: Annie Farmer

Mr. Everdell references a post the juror made to Annie Farmer.

Social media/online post
N/A

Appreciation for travel

From: Annie Farmer
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Farmer thanked Epstein for paying for her ticket upon arrival in New Mexico.

Verbal
N/A

Trip to New Mexico

From: Narrator's Mother (Mom)
To: Annie Farmer

Mother told Annie that Maxwell would be in New Mexico with Epstein.

Conversation
N/A

Jury service appreciation

From: Annie Farmer
To: ["Unnamed Juror"]

Annie Farmer posted a Tweet thanking the juror for their jury service.

Tweet
N/A

Thanking a victim

From: Unnamed Juror
To: Annie Farmer

A juror told Annie Farmer, a victim in the case, "Thanks for telling my story" after the trial.

Verbal communication
N/A

Support for sharing her story

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Juror 50 posted a comment on social media to Annie Farmer, a witness in the case, in which he “thanked her for sharing [her] story.”

Social media comment
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity