| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Social media interaction |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Communication |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim accused |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Social media interaction |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Siblings |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror witness interaction |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer's sister
|
Family |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Accused of sexual abuse |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer meets Jeffrey Epstein at his home before going to a theater production. | Epstein's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage incident | New Mexico Ranch | View |
| N/A | N/A | Incident in a movie theater | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 communicated with Annie Farmer. | View | |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged assault where Ghislaine Maxwell touched Annie Farmer's breasts during a massage. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to Thailand and Vietnam | Thailand and Vietnam | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview with agents regarding evidence (boots) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer traveled to Thailand. | Thailand | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Mulligan and Annie Farmer began dating. | Unknown (High School contex... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Annie Farmer | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Running of TECS reports for three individuals. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer's prom (depicted in photo Exhibit 102). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse in Epstein's residences | New Mexico, London, U.S. Vi... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Purchase of cowboy boots for Annie Farmer | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to Thailand and Vietnam funded by Epstein | Thailand, Vietnam | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual assault where Maxwell touched Farmer's breasts during a massage. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror posted on social media about serving on the jury and communicated with witness Annie Farmer. | Twitter (Online) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer arrives at the New Mexico ranch. | New Mexico Ranch (Zorro Ranch) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grooming of Annie Farmer | Unknown (incident involving... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Mulligan's Wedding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer visits Manhattan townhouse; Epstein grooms her while watching a movie. | Manhattan townhouse, New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annie Farmer sent to New Mexico ranch for an 'academically gifted' retreat. | Epstein's ranch in New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 (Scotty David) changed his Twitter handle and deleted a tweet to Annie Farmer. | View | |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' trial testimony | Court | View |
| N/A | Crime | Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly sexually abused Annie Farmer as a child and procured other girls for ... | N/A | View |
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Mulligan. The questioning establishes that Mulligan had spoken to The New York Times about the case and that an individual named Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. The transcript concludes with attorney Ms. Pomerantz beginning her redirect examination by referencing a previous question from defense counsel about Mulligan's conversations with 'Annie'.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to recall Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.' The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to the questioning as leading, but the Court allows the line of inquiry to proceed.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer. In the testimony, Farmer affirms she has not coordinated her testimony with other witnesses or been told what to say. She states her purpose for testifying is to hold Ghislaine Maxwell accountable for harm caused. The questioning then pivots to Farmer's application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of Annie Farmer. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her desire to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, followed by a redirect examination by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz asking about the impact of Farmer's experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. The page concludes with Farmer beginning to describe her experiences as 'upsetting and confusing'.
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Government on June 22, 2022, provides background on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed co-conspirator (the defendant). It outlines the timeline of the investigation, starting in November 2018, and details the indictments against Epstein and the defendant, which involved the abuse of several victims identified as Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, and Carolyn. The document asserts that the investigation was prompted by investigative journalism and not by civil litigants.
This document is a Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 670, filed 06/22/22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines sections pertaining to a criminal case, including background, charges, summary of proof at trial concerning the sexual abuse of multiple individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Melissa), pre-sentence report and sentencing guidelines, discussion on the defendant's conduct warranting imprisonment, and financial penalties. The document details various sentencing enhancements and arguments related to the defendant's sentence.
This document contains excerpts from an interview with a juror named David following the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed as a court exhibit. David explains that while the jury could not convict based on accuser 'Kate's' testimony due to UK age of consent laws, her testimony was crucial in establishing Maxwell's grooming 'pattern' involving boundary confusion and massage. David also defends his own responses to the pre-trial questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
This legal document argues that a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, engaged in a post-trial publicity tour, including a documentary interview, potentially for financial gain. The government's public filing of a letter (Docket No. 568) to stop the juror's media appearances is presented as a strategic move to prevent further scrutiny of the juror's conduct, which could have provided grounds for a new trial for the defendant, Ms. Maxwell.
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, is part of Ms. Maxwell's defense, arguing against the reliability of her accusers' memories. It highlights similarities between the claims of accusers (Jane, Carolyn, Kate, Annie Farmer) and those of Juror No. 50, who also claims to be a victim of abuse. The document focuses on Juror No. 50's assertion that his memory can be 'replayed like a video,' directly contradicting the expert testimony of Dr. Loftus, who stated that memory is a constructive process, thereby questioning the validity of such memory claims and suggesting potential juror bias.
This document is a court filing (Page 25 of 66) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on 02/24/22. It presents a screenshot of Twitter activity involving 'Scotty David' (identified in the text as Juror No. 50), who interacted with witness Annie Farmer and journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The legal commentary notes that Juror No. 50 changed his handle to '@NycSsddd' and attempted to delete a tweet to Ms. Farmer shortly after sending it.
This document is a court filing (Exhibit) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed on February 24, 2022. It displays a screenshot of Twitter interactions involving Juror No. 50 (Scotty David), journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley, and witness Annie Farmer. The document highlights that Juror No. 50 publicly communicated with a witness (Farmer) on Twitter, stating her testimony was critical to the verdict, and used a Twitter handle matching his name given in press interviews.
This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It shows screenshots of tweets from Lucia Osborne-Crowley, who announced an exclusive interview with a juror ('Scotty') from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, and a responsive tweet from Annie Farmer expressing gratitude. The document states that Juror No. 50 subsequently 'liked' Farmer's tweet and then tweeted directly at her, indicating a direct social media interaction between a juror and a witness/survivor.
This legal document outlines the defense's argument that it was hindered by the unavailability of old records. Specifically, incomplete travel records from Shoppers Travel prevented them from challenging the testimony of witnesses Annie Farmer and Jane regarding their travel with Epstein. Furthermore, the lack of bank and credit card records from the 1990s and 2000s meant the defense could not contest the government's claims about a $30 million payment from Epstein to Ms. Maxwell or verify other key dates.
This legal document discusses the significance of flight records in a trial, arguing that contemporaneous passenger manifests and travel records were crucial for verifying accusers' timelines. It highlights the inadequacy of the flight logs kept by David Rodgers, which were incomplete and used generic identifiers. The document also references testimony from Cimberly Espinosa and Annie Farmer regarding travel arrangements made by Epstein, including flights for accuser 'Jane' when she was 16 and a trip for Annie Farmer to New Mexico.
This page of a court document discusses the legal arguments regarding the conspiracy charges against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. It argues that despite violating different statutes, the actions constituted a single criminal agreement to groom and abuse minors, rather than separate independent conspiracies, and analyzes the interdependence between the counts.
This document is an index of examinations from a legal proceeding, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses WILLIAM BROWN, ANNIE FARMER, DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN, and JANICE SWAIN by various attorneys, including Mr. Rohrbach, Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, referencing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony establishes that Annie Farmer is the middle child of Maria Farmer (born in 1969) and introduces Annie Farmer's birth certificate into evidence as Government Exhibit 13.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Ms. Sternheim concludes her questioning of witness Mr. Mulligan, establishing that he spoke to the New York Times to corroborate a story and that Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. Ms. Pomerantz then begins a redirect examination regarding Mulligan's memory of conversations with Annie.
This document contains a page from the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Mulligan in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Mulligan testifies that he dated Annie Farmer in high school during the fall/winter of 1996. He confirms that Annie Farmer told him she went to Thailand in the summer of 1996 and that the trip was paid for by Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on clarifying details regarding Jeffrey Epstein's anatomy and specific actions he took while in bed with the witness, amidst procedural objections from defense attorney Ms. Menninger.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer testifies that she does not need a journal or paper to remember Ghislaine Maxwell touching her breasts during a massage because it was a 'very distressing event.'
This document is a transcript page from the direct examination of Annie Farmer (A. Farmer) in the case US v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony confirms that in the summer of 1996, when Farmer was 17 years old, Jeffrey Epstein paid for her trip to Thailand and Vietnam. Government Exhibit 103, a photo of Farmer in Thailand, was admitted into evidence without objection.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer. Farmer testifies that she spoke to Jeffrey Epstein by phone 2-3 times after a trip to New York and subsequently met him in person in New Mexico in April 1996. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibit 102, a photo of Farmer getting ready for prom, to establish her physical appearance during the spring of 1996.
This document is a page from the court transcript of Annie Farmer's direct testimony (Case 1:20-cr-00330). She describes meeting Jeffrey Epstein at his 'very grand' home in the city, noting his casual demeanor and the stark contrast between his large residence and her sister's small apartment. She recalls sitting across a large wooden desk from him in a library room before his driver took them to a theater production.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies that her sister, Maria, told her about a trip to New York where Jeffrey Epstein was interested in helping Annie with her education and was purchasing her travel ticket. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on hearsay grounds, but the objection is overruled by the Court.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Annie Farmer | $0.00 | Payment for trip to Thailand and Vietnam | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Annie Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket (implied flight) fo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein Victim Co... | Annie Farmer | $0.00 | Claim/Application submitted to the Epstein Vict... | View |
Direct communication via Twitter.
Investigative interview
Epstein invited them into his home, served champagne, talked, and asked about her plans.
Witness questioned about telling the truth during public interviews.
Mother told Annie that Maxwell would be in New Mexico with Epstein.
Farmer thanked Epstein for paying for her ticket upon arrival in New Mexico.
Annie Farmer posted a Tweet thanking the juror for their jury service.
A juror told Annie Farmer, a victim in the case, "Thanks for telling my story" after the trial.
Juror 50 posted a comment on social media to Annie Farmer, a witness in the case, in which he “thanked her for sharing [her] story.”
Expressed gratitude for the juror who disclosed his trauma, as well as for other women who testified and other survivors.
The document states that Juror No. 50 'liked' the tweet posted by annie farmer.
The document states that Juror No. 50 tweeted directly to Ms. Farmer in response, but the content is not provided.
Annie Farmer expressed gratitude for the juror who disclosed his own trauma, for the other women who testified, and for other survivors.
Maria told Annie that Epstein was interested in helping her with education and purchasing her ticket.
On Twitter, Annie Farmer shared an article that contained an interview with Juror 50.
On Twitter, Annie Farmer shared an article that contained an interview with Juror 50.
Mr. Everdell references a post the juror made to Annie Farmer.
Referenced in defense memorandum.
Juror No. 50 used Twitter to communicate directly to Annie Farmer.
Thanking Annie Farmer for her bravery and stating her story was critical to the verdict.
Thanked Annie Farmer for sharing her story; commented on an article Farmer shared.
Maria told Annie to come to New York.
Agents asked Farmer if she still had the boots.
Thanking Annie Farmer for sharing her story and article on Twitter.
Farmer shared an article containing an interview with Juror 50.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity