Kenneth A. Marra
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JOHNSON
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
James I. Cohn
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judge litigant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth L. Ryskamp
|
Professional judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Linnea R. Johnson
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Linnea R. Johnson
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth L. Ryskamp
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William J. Zloch
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Susan H. Black
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 4
|
Judge presiding over case involving |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Judge presiding over case involving |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Federal judge ruled the plea deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2021-10-15 | N/A | Court Order Issued | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-06-01 | N/A | Judge Marra ruling on Crime Victims' Rights Act violation | Federal Court | View |
| 2019-02-25 | N/A | Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | South Florida | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | Federal judge rules DOJ broke the law regarding Epstein's plea deal. | Florida | View |
| 2019-02-01 | N/A | Ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra finding Acosta misled Epstein victims. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors broke the law regarding the E... | South Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra ruled that prosecutors mishandled the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2015-04-15 | N/A | Order Denying Intervenor's Motion for a Protective Order issued by Judge Marra. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2015-04-06 | N/A | Judge Marra issues order denying joinder and striking impertinent details. | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice filed | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Judge Marra denies Defendant's motion to redact tax records. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-30 | N/A | Judge Marra signs order granting motion for open trial and to identify Jane Doe. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-29 | N/A | Order granting Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages signed by Judge Marra. | Court | View |
| 2010-06-25 | N/A | Order Affirming Magistrate Judge Johnson's Discovery Orders signed by Judge Marra. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-25 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-24 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice signed and case closed | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-06-24 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered on FLSD Docket. | Palm Beach County Courthous... | View |
| 2010-06-14 | N/A | Judge Kenneth A. Marra signs Order of Reference referring pretrial discovery motions to Magistrat... | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-05-19 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case following a settlement. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-05-18 | N/A | Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered, closing the case based on a settlement. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-04-29 | N/A | Order requiring counsel to confer and file joint reports signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2010-04-27 | N/A | Judge Marra accepts transfer of case | Southern District of Florida | View |
087-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591). The order grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of December 15, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the plaintiff's response regarding a motion to dismiss.
081-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order (Document 81-1) from the case Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket on November 16, 2009. The order grants Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of November 27, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the Plaintiff's response regarding the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The document lists Kenneth A. Marra as the presiding United States District Judge.
078-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591). The document grants Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to reply to the plaintiff's response regarding a motion to dismiss. The new deadline set for Epstein's filing is November 16, 2009.
076-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591). Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of October 30, 2009, for filing a responsive pleading.
070-01.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated August 2009. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to reply to Plaintiff Jane Doe 101's response regarding a motion to dismiss. The new deadline for Epstein's responsive pleading is set for October 15, 2009.
064-01.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida (Exhibit A), signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. The order mandates that Epstein and his agents preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including records of domestic and international travel on private airplanes, phone communications, computer data, and items resulting from the October 25, 2005 search of his Palm Beach home. It establishes preservation timelines ranging from 1998 to 2005 depending on the specific plaintiff and defines sanctions for wrongful destruction of evidence.
057-01.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated July 2009 (entered on docket July 2, 2009). Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time. Epstein was given until August 21, 2009, to file a reply to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101's response regarding a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint.
046.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 7, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 9:09-CV-80591-KAM). The order grants a motion for the limited appearance of attorney Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. to represent Jeffrey Epstein and authorizes him to receive electronic filing notifications at jay.lefkowitz@kirkland.com.
028-03.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion by Plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 101 and 102) to preserve evidence in their cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including flight logs ('travel in Defendant's private airplanes'), phone records, computer data since 1998, financial records regarding payments to victims, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly forbids the destruction, deletion, or alteration of any such evidence.
019.pdf
This document is a consolidated court order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 14, 2009, covering multiple civil lawsuits (Jane Does, C.M.A., etc.) against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra requests the United States government provide its official position regarding Epstein's motion to stay these civil cases. Epstein argued that defending himself in these civil suits might violate his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the USAO and subject him to criminal prosecution.
018.pdf
This document is a court order dated May 14, 2009, from the Southern District of Florida, consolidating eleven separate civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein for the purposes of discovery and procedural motions. Judge Kenneth A. Marra designates 'Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein' as the lead case for filings and sets strict limits on depositions to prevent duplication, ruling that defendants and common witnesses may be deposed only once across all cases. The order aims to improve judicial economy and efficiency in handling the multiple lawsuits filed by various Jane Does and other plaintiffs.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
005.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 20, 2009. The order directs counsel for Plaintiff 'Jane Do No. 101' and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein to confer and file joint scheduling and discovery reports in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It outlines specific deadlines for these conferences and reports following the filing of an answer or motion.
002.pdf
Summons in a Civil Case issued on April 17, 2009, by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-80591 (Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein). The document summons Jeffrey Epstein, noted as being located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, to answer the complaint within 20 days. It lists Epstein's defense counsel (Spicer, Goldberger, Critton) and the plaintiff's attorneys (Josefsberg and Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A.).
001.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on April 17, 2009, by Jane Doe No. 101 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff alleges that in 2003, when she was a 17-year-old high school student, she was recruited and transported to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was sexually assaulted under the guise of giving massages. The complaint asserts causes of action under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 regarding coercion, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and transport of child pornography.
017.pdf
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 10-CV-80447 (C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein) in the Southern District of Florida. The case was dismissed following a stipulation by the parties, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce settlement terms. The order was signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on June 24, 2010.
016-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80447). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case following a stipulation by the parties, denied all pending motions as moot, and retained jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement. The order was entered on the docket on June 24, 2010.
015.pdf
This document is an Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80447). Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders that all pretrial discovery motions, including motions for sanctions and mental/physical examinations, be referred to Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson for disposition. The order was signed on June 14, 2010.
014.pdf
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated June 15, 2010, in the case of C.L. v. Jeffrey Epstein. Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson denied Epstein's emergency motions for a protective order and attorney's fees as moot. The denial was based on a representation that the dispute was resolved because the plaintiff (C.L.) agreed to postpone a deposition.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 11, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 10-80447) by Plaintiff C.L. requesting a 10-day extension to respond to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The extension was requested because Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer T. Kuvin, had a conflicting trial starting the same day in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing Epstein's legal team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) and a proposed order for Judge Kenneth A. Marra to sign.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
Acceptance of Transfer
Judge Marra accepts the transfer and updates the case number suffix to MARRA.
Order of Transfer
Transferring case 09-81092 to Judge Marra's calendar pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure 2.15.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity