Villafaña
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Acosta
|
Business associate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Business associate |
22
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Professional adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Subordinate supervisor |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Adversarial prosecutor defendant |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Subordinate supervisor |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Reiter
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Supervisor subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Subordinate supervisor |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Black
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sanchez
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña advised defense team regarding non-prosecution agreement context | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Final revision of language by Villafaña for non-prosecution provision | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting process of the NPA and federal plea agreement | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews regarding the handling of the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Plea negotiation | Negotiations for a plea agreement for Mr. Epstein were underway, with a deadline set for the foll... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Defense counsel Jay Lefkowitz submitted a revised draft plea agreement that substantially changed... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal dispute | Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Decision | Villafaña and the FBI case agents decided to stop informing victims about the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Villafaña was interviewed by OPR regarding her recollection of the events. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Internal discussion | The USAO considered various charging and plea options for Epstein, including a plea to a federal ... | USAO | View |
| N/A | Interview | OPR conducted interviews with Acosta, Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Villafaña about the origins of... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting to discuss how to proceed with the Epstein case, where the FBI insisted on lifetime sex... | USAO in Miami | View |
| N/A | Interview | Villafaña was interviewed by OPR regarding the NPA provision for co-conspirators. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Drafting and discussion of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically a ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Dispute | A professional dispute occurred between Villafaña and Menchel over the handling of plea negotiati... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Communication | Villafaña sent an email to Sanchez proposing a discussion about a federal resolution for Mr. Epst... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated the dispute, taking statements from ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Negotiations over a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein, involving arguments, proposals, ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Sloman told Villafaña that pre-charge resolutions do not require victim notification. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal process | Discussions regarding whether to contact victims about the potential resolution of the case befor... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A federal investigation into Epstein's abuse, which victims and their attorneys were told was ong... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement negotiation | The NPA was negotiated and signed, with terms that were later found to have unintended consequenc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) negotiations between Villafaña and Lefkowitz regarding Jeffrey Ep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | OPR interviewed Villafaña about her emails and the tenor of her interactions during the NPA negot... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Negotiation and drafting of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that included a broad provision not... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023228.jpg
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
DOJ-OGR-00023194.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a timeline of meetings between the USAO (including Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (including Dershowitz, Starr, and Lefkowitz). It covers the period from February 2007 to January 2008, categorizing meetings as 'Pre-NPA' and 'Post-NPA'. The table logs specific participants and topics, including the presentation of the NPA term sheet, discussions of investigation improprieties, and the negotiation of state plea provisions.
DOJ-OGR-00023132.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea following the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes legal maneuvering by Epstein's defense team, including Kenneth Starr calling senior DOJ official Alice Fisher, and disagreements between the USAO and defense regarding the timeline for the plea entry, which was eventually set for January 4, 2008. The document also highlights internal communications regarding Epstein's failure to use 'best efforts' to comply with the NPA timeline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017973.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377) describing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 work release conditions. It details how Epstein paid Palm Beach Sheriff's deputies to monitor him while he spent up to 12 hours a day at his office, where he met with male and female visitors behind closed doors without deputy supervision. The article notes that visitor logs from this time were kept in a safe but no longer exist, and highlights how deputies began referring to him as a 'client' rather than an 'inmate'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013333.jpg
This document details the timeline in June and July 2008 when attorney Bradley Edwards was retained by victims E.W., Jane Doe, and L.M. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to disclose a negotiated plea agreement that would block federal prosecution while simultaneously confirming concrete evidence of Epstein molesting minors. It also notes the U.S. Attorney's Office refusal to share collected evidence, specifically listing items confiscated from Epstein's home such as sex toys and massage equipment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021756.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news article (likely the Miami Herald) presented as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the 2008 plea deal negotiations and sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a specific quote from prosecutor Villafaña about hiding other crimes and co-conspirators from the judge. It also documents false statements made in court regarding victim notification and includes comments from victims' attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting higher-ups directed the prosecutors' actions. The document includes a footer with contact details for Epstein's lawyer, Darren K. Indyke.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755.jpg
This document, stemming from a House Oversight collection, appears to be an excerpt from a report or article comparing the U.S. Attorney's Office's strict handling of a defendant named McDaniel with their lenient handling of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how prosecutors Acosta and Villafaña negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein's lawyers (including Jay Lefkowitz) in 2007, suppressing a 53-page federal indictment and keeping victims uninformed to ensure the deal's success. The text highlights the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation which exposed these actions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021754.jpg
This document describes a court sentencing hearing for a defendant named McDaniel, where initial arguments for leniency were overturned after the victim's mother revealed further details about McDaniel's behavior. Following an inquiry by Judge Zloch, prosecutor Villafaña admitted to McDaniel's history with other minors, leading the judge to double the sentence to 10 years and later reprimand the prosecutor for withholding information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021752.jpg
The document discusses the handling of sexual abuse cases, mentioning Jeffrey Epstein's leniency and defending prosecutor Villafaña's record through statements by her lawyer, Jonathan Biran. It then details the case of Adam McDaniel, a Texas teenager who traveled to Florida in 2005 to meet a minor he met online, leading to his arrest and guilty plea on federal charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021748.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke in 2019 (based on copyright), containing the text of a news article or report reviewing the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the courtroom exchange where prosecutor Belohlavek misled Judge Pucillo about victim notification and agreement with the plea deal. It also references Alex Acosta's defense of the deal, the Labor Department's statement, and attorney Bradley Edwards' assertion that prosecutor Villafaña was directed by superiors to keep victims uninformed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021746.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a media report or article included in House Oversight materials (Bates stamp 021746). While the caption highlights Alex Acosta's role in the Jeffrey Epstein plea deal, the body text details a parallel or related legal case involving a defendant named McDaniel who preyed on minors. In that case, Judge Zloch criticized prosecutor Villafaña for withholding the defendant's predatory history, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to have the judge's comments struck from the record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021745.jpg
This document details a sentencing hearing for a defendant named McDaniel. The defense (Hunt) argued for leniency, while the prosecutor (Villafaña) requested 5-6 years. The victim's mother provided a statement highlighting the trauma inflicted and revealing that McDaniel had violated a no-contact order and previously discussed sexual acts with another minor. Judge Zloch interrupted the proceedings to inquire specifically about the mention of another incident involving a minor girl.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021743.jpg
This document appears to be a news excerpt or report included in House Oversight records. It highlights the career of AUSA Villafaña, specifically praising her advocacy for victims and mentioning an award she received in 2011. To illustrate her work, the text details the prosecution of Adam McDaniel, a Texas man who traveled to Florida in 2005 to meet a 14-year-old girl he met online, resulting in his 2006 guilty plea for enticing a minor.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021738.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke (likely in 2019) containing the text of a news article reviewing the 2008 plea deal of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the failure to inform victims about the plea agreement, citing court transcripts between Judge Pucillo and prosecutor Belohlavek, and includes comments from victim attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting prosecutors were directed by superiors to settle. The document includes Indyke's signature block with contact details redacted and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021737.jpg
This document, likely an excerpt from a report or article submitted to the House Oversight Committee, details the prosecutorial misconduct surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It contrasts a previous case (McDaniel) where prosecutors were criticized for lack of candor with the Epstein negotiations in September 2007, where prosecutors Villafaña and Acosta actively worked to hide the scope of Epstein's crimes from the judge and the public. It highlights an email where Villafaña explicitly states she prefers not to highlight other crimes or potential co-defendants to the judge during sentencing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021736.jpg
This document serves as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation, likely highlighting systemic issues or specific personnel (like Andrew Lourie or Alex Acosta) within the U.S. Attorney's office. While the caption references the Epstein plea deal, the body text details a separate case ('McDaniel') presided over by Judge Zloch, where prosecutors (Villafaña and later Lourie) were criticized for failing to disclose the defendant's predatory history or arguing it was irrelevant. The document illustrates a pattern of prosecutorial conduct regarding sexual abuse cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021735.jpg
This document is a narrative summary of a sentencing hearing for a defendant named McDaniel, presided over by Judge Zloch. The text details arguments regarding sentencing length, character references, and the victim's mother's statement regarding McDaniel's manipulation and grooming behavior. The page concludes with Judge Zloch interrupting to inquire about a reference to McDaniel's involvement with another minor girl.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021733.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a report or news article included in House Oversight files regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It profiles Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) Villafaña, praising her advocacy for victims and detailing a specific successful prosecution from 2006 involving Adam McDaniel, a Texas man who traveled to Florida to entice a 14-year-old minor. The document highlights the severity of the charges and the gratitude of the victim's parents toward the prosecutor.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016454.jpg
This document page, likely from a House Oversight Committee report, features a photograph of a woman (presumably Villafaña) and a text excerpt describing her frustration during legal negotiations. It quotes a communication from Villafaña to Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz, dated December 13, 2007, in which she claims to have 'bent over backwards' to accommodate the effects of an agreement on Mr. Epstein.
Rule 11(c) Pleas
Stated binding pleas were uncommon in the district.
Notification dialogue
Draft provided to Acosta to open dialogue concerning notification of all victims; OPR found no evidence Acosta sent it.
Explanation of victim notification process
Explained why she created her own template and how letters were delivered.
N/A
Emails exchanged during NPA negotiations.
Gratitude
Letter thanking Villafaña at the conclusion of the case
Status of investigation
Informed him of state court plea, declined to provide additional information; omitted NPA details.
Provision not to prosecute 'any potential co-conspirators'
Villafaña sent an email stating that she did not believe the provision 'hurts us.' This was the only written discussion OPR found about the term.
Epstein investigation updates
Villafaña directed emails to senior supervisors, at times without copying her immediate supervisor, to update them on the case.
Impeachment concerns
Villafaña raised impeachment concerns; neither advised her concerns were improper.
Plea hearing notification
Villafaña told Edwards the hearing was 'important' but did not disclose the global resolution.
Sentencing Agreement
Discussing the wording of the sentencing agreement for the judge.
Witness Willingness
Villafaña informed her supervisors that victims were willing to tell their stories but might find it harder to do so in front of a jury.
Victim notification of Epstein's June 30, 2008 plea
Villafaña drafted a victim notification letter concerning the plea, which was intended to be sent immediately after the plea occurred. The draft was shared with the defense for comments.
Draft NPA
Villafaña sent an email to Lourie about the draft NPA, asking for '[a]ny other thoughts,' but received no further input.
NPA non-prosecution provision
Villafaña sent an email referencing the non-prosecution provision and observed that it 'doesn't hurt us.' None of the recipients commented.
Victims' reluctance for trial
Villafaña described to OPR that most victims wanted the case resolved via a plea and did not want to testify in court due to privacy concerns.
Concerns about Epstein's confinement terms
Villafaña recounted a conversation with Goldberger, who swore Epstein would be in custody 24/7 but then let it slip he would be at the stockade, not the jail, which Villafaña believed violated the NPA.
Request for a phone call
Villafaña sent a reply email asking Lourie to call her.
Revised draft plea agreement
Lefkowitz sent Villafaña a revised draft plea agreement with terms different from what was discussed with Lourie, including a 16-month sentence and a prohibition on the USAO initiating immigration proceedings against Epstein's assistants.
Frustration with revised plea agreement
Villafaña circulated the defense's revised plea agreement, expressing frustration that the terms were completely different from what was expected and that the defense wanted an improper sentencing calculation.
Prevalence of Rule 11(c) pleas
Villafaña told OPR that Rule 11(c) pleas were "uncommon" in the Southern District of Florida because judges dislike being told what sentence to impose, and that she had never offered such a plea.
PBPD Chief's alert about Epstein plea
Villafaña emailed about the PBPD Chief alerting the FBI that a news article would report Epstein was pleading to a state charge and that the Chief wanted to know if victims were consulted. Sloman forwarded this email to Acosta with the note 'fyi.'
Draft plea agreement and NPA for Epstein case
Villafaña circulated a draft federal plea agreement and a draft non-prosecution agreement (NPA) to her colleagues.
Concerns regarding potential impeachment evidence
Villafaña emailed Sloman about her concern that if victims were told about potential monetary damages, it could be used against them in cross-examination.
Plea proposal for Epstein
Described as happening "Late last night" relative to Villafaña's email, Lefkowitz asked about Epstein pleading to two twelve-month federal charges with half the jail time in home confinement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity