THE COURT
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018270.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge, a government attorney (Ms. Comey), and a defense attorney (Mr. Everdell). They discuss the witness schedule, anticipating finishing with Mr. Parkinson and calling Agent Maguire next. The attorneys also address the handling of evidence, including redacting a video and the incomplete process of dedesignating photos, before the court calls for a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey and the judge regarding the proper procedure for redacting video evidence to protect witness anonymity and third-party privacy. Ms. Comey also raises a technical concern that the timestamps on the redacted video will not align with the official transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00018267.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between the court, Ms. Comey, and Ms. Sternheim. The main topic is the redaction of a warrant and video evidence to protect individual privacy before public release. Ms. Sternheim describes a video as depicting a 'domicile of debauchery,' a characterization with which the court agrees, leading to an agreement that a redacted version of the materials will be prepared for the public.
DOJ-OGR-00018266.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge excuses a witness, Mr. Parkinson, for a break. Following the witness's departure, the judge engages with counsel, Ms. Sternheim, and expresses concern that the sealing of exhibits is getting "out of hand," mentioning a recent conference on the topic with a Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018265.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Parkinson is being questioned by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the layout of Jeffrey Epstein's property at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The testimony identifies Government Exhibits 276, 277, and 278 as depicting the master bedroom and master shower room on the second floor. The government offers Exhibit 278 under seal to protect third-party privacy before the court breaks for a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018264.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The testimony revolves around identifying and describing the contents of several government exhibits (269, 271, 272, 273), which depict various views of a second-floor hallway and master bedroom. The witness describes the scenes but at one point expresses confusion about the directional orientation in one of the exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00018262.jpg
This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, details a portion of a direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The government's attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully admits exhibits 289 through 293 into evidence, which are said to accurately depict the second floor of a house at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. After the exhibits are admitted without objection, Ms. Comey begins questioning the witness about their contents.
DOJ-OGR-00018261.jpg
This document is page 160 of a court transcript from the trial Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by Ms. Comey regarding the layout of a building, specifically identifying a staff room and bathroom on the ground floor/north side. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibits 289 through 293 for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00018259.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details interactions between the Court, attorney Ms. Comey, and witness Mr. Parkinson, primarily focusing on instructions to jurors regarding the viewing and handling of several Government Exhibits (GX252, GX253, GX254, GX241), with one exhibit being admitted under seal. The document captures a segment of Mr. Parkinson's direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018258.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The testimony concerns photographs (Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254) depicting the interior of 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The exhibits are admitted into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00018256.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson, during which Ms. Comey (Government) moves to admit Government Exhibits 243 through 250 under seal. The Court admits the evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and the jurors are instructed to review Exhibits 243, 244, 245, and 246 in their binders.
DOJ-OGR-00018250.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Parkinson identifies photographic exhibits (226-241) as accurately depicting the interior of a house at 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005. Based on this testimony, Ms. Comey, on behalf of the government, offers the exhibits into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018249.jpg
This document is page 148 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson by prosecutor Ms. Comey, specifically focusing on the admission and presentation of Government Exhibits 223, 224, and 225 to the jury without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The page concludes with Ms. Comey preparing to show the witness Exhibits 226 through 241.
DOJ-OGR-00018248.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. Parkinson testifies about photographs of a 'garden room' at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The government, represented by Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit three exhibits (GX223, 224, 225) into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of third parties, with no objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018247.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey first addresses the judge regarding the jury's use of binders and then proceeds to question Mr. Parkinson about Government Exhibits 223, 224, and 225.
DOJ-OGR-00018246.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The witness identifies various locations on a property, including a cabana, storage building, and barracks, while narrating a walk-through video being shown as evidence. The transcript concludes with the attorney, Ms. Comey, ending the video presentation and the judge providing instructions to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018244.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying specific rooms and features of a property, such as a computer room and an elevator on the second floor, with references to diagrams and Government Exhibit 297. The proceedings are overseen by a judge, with another attorney, Mr. Everdell, present.
DOJ-OGR-00018242.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by an attorney, Ms. Comey, who asks the witness to identify various rooms (garden room, lake room, foyer, bathroom) within a property based on viewing a recording at specific time marks. The proceedings are briefly interrupted by the judge to allow for a monitor adjustment at the lectern.
DOJ-OGR-00018241.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a direct examination where Ms. Comey is directing Ms. Drescher to play a video on a laptop for the court. The proceedings pause to allow Ms. Sternheim to move to see the screen, and the witness identifies 'Architectural drawings' visible in the video at the seven-minute and eight-second mark.
DOJ-OGR-00018237.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The testimony authenticates a video depicting the interior and exterior of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) as it appeared during a search on October 20, 2005. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully moves to admit the video (Exhibit 296R) under seal to protect the identities of pseudonym witnesses and third parties.
DOJ-OGR-00018235.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the proceedings after a lunch break. The judge instructs attorney Ms. Comey to resume her direct examination of the witness, Mr. Parkinson, and reminds him he is still under oath. The judge also provides instructions to the jury regarding adjustments to their screens for a video that will not be shown to the public gallery.
DOJ-OGR-00018231.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between several attorneys (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and the judge. The discussion centers on the afternoon's witness schedule, including Kimberly Meder and Stephen Flatley, and a request by Ms. Menninger to address issues with evidentiary material that was disclosed very late the previous night. The judge and attorneys work to clarify the order of proceedings for the remainder of the session.
DOJ-OGR-00018230.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion about legal strategy and evidence presentation. The defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, confirms to the court their request to not give a specific jury instruction regarding a photo of a minor, to avoid highlighting it. Subsequently, Ms. Comey informs the court that the parties have agreed to redact a portion of a video (Government Exhibit 296), which shows Detective Recarey reading a search warrant, before it is played for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018227.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a segment where the Court excuses Mr. Parkinson and a witness for a lunch break, while Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell, counsel, discuss plans to confer on limiting instructions and technical preparations. The proceedings are set to resume in 45 minutes, highlighting the procedural management of a court hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00018226.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by Ms. Comey regarding a photograph of a work area containing cookbooks and notes. The witness identifies the name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' written in the photograph before the proceedings are halted by the Judge for a lunch break.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $9,500,000.00 | Value of real property offered as collateral. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | security company | THE COURT | $1,000,000.00 | Bond co-signed by a security company. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $550,000.00 | Cash offered as collateral. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | THE COURT | $28,500,000.00 | Proposed total bond amount. | View |
| 2020-12-14 | Received | Sureties (Family/... | THE COURT | $0.00 | Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... | View |
| 2020-07-13 | Received | Unidentified co-s... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Co-signers (Sibli... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Defense/Co-signers | THE COURT | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Co-signers (Sibli... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Ms. Maxwell / Ass... | THE COURT | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $22,500,000.00 | Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2019-07-11 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | THE COURT | $77,000,000.00 | Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... | View |
| 2010-07-01 | Received | Epstein's counsel | THE COURT | $5,000.00 | Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. | View |
Response to victims' letter
The Defendant submitted a letter in response to the letter from the attorney for two individuals.
Testimony regarding her circumstances and relationship wi...
Dr. Eva Dubin testified on the stand that she had just had a baby and that she knew Sophie, who was a professional masseuse.
Ghislaine Maxwell Appeal
A legal brief was filed by the Assistant United States Attorneys on behalf of the Appellee.
Ghislaine Maxwell Appeal
A legal brief was filed by attorneys from Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC on behalf of the Defendant-Appellant.
Notification of crime victims
The Court mentions a letter in which the government indicated its actions regarding notifying crime victims.
Adjournment of court
The judge (THE COURT) confirms with counsel (MS. MOE and MS. STERNHEIM) that there are no further matters to discuss before adjourning the court until the following day.
Courtroom procedure for objections
The judge instructs attorneys to cite a rule of evidence for objections instead of using one-word grounds, to avoid improperly communicating with the jury or witnesses. The attorneys acknowledge the instruction, confirm no further business is expected, and the court adjourns.
Defendant's bail
A recent submission to the court mentioned that victims or their counsel had been contacted and were of the view that there should be no bail for the defendant.
Letters of support for the Defendant
A series of letters (Exs. A-N, W-X) submitted to the court to support the Defendant's claim of having significant ties to the United States and to attest to her character.
Letter of support for the Defendant
A letter from the Defendant's spouse describing the 'quiet family life' they led before her arrest, intended to counter the Government's characterization of her 'transient' lifestyle.
Pretrial Services Report
A report which states that at the time of her arrest, the Defendant was not living with her spouse and claimed they were getting divorced.
Briefing schedule and adjournment
The judge discusses the briefing schedule with Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell, then adjourns the court until the following morning.
Defense subpoena
The Court mentions receiving a letter from lawyers stating they have a defense subpoena and their witness would invoke.
Pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
The court outlines the schedule for the case, including past and future dates for jury selection and trial commencement, and states the agenda for the current conference, which is to address the defendant's motions.
Procedural matters and scheduling
The judge discusses scheduling for the next day, expresses disappointment over multiple sidebars during openings, and schedules a pre-session meeting to address issues in advance. The court is then adjourned.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States of America v. Ghisl...
The Court received a significant number of submissions from non-parties that it deemed procedurally improper or irrelevant and stated they would not be considered or docketed.
Declining invitation to deliberate
The jury sent a note to the court declining the invitation to deliberate on the following day ('tomorrow').
A set of facts related to the case
A brief submitted by Ms. Brune's side, which is being questioned for containing material omissions. Ms. Brune denies any intent to make material omissions.
Updating Contact Information and Captioning Rules
Instructions on how to update addresses in CM/ECF/PACER and how court captions are handled pursuant to FRAP rules.
Response to Court Order (Dkt. No. 270)
States MDC staff conduct flashlight checks as a matter of course and explains procedures.
Request for redactions
Arguments for redactions based on undisclosed issues, credibility, and due process.
Sentencing Statements
Statements regarding the defendant/impact, permitted to be part of the record.
Reply brief
Arguments for suppression under Martindell and due process.
Logistical arrangements
Government must inform the Court regarding victim notification efforts.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity