DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00020546.jpg
This document is a court docket from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing numerous filings entered on November 12, 2021. The entries primarily consist of motions in limine from both the defense (Maxwell's team) and the prosecution (USA) to include or exclude specific evidence, testimony, and exhibits, such as items from a 2005 search and statements from an alleged co-conspirator. The docket also includes a memo endorsement from Judge Alison J. Nathan ordering the submission of lists and redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's order regarding the handling of subpoenas involving alleged victims, specifically requiring a law firm (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) to coordinate with defense counsel on redactions and objections. The docket also records Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, the filing of several sealed documents, and the formal appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020503.jpg
This legal document, a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, details several filings and orders from December 2020 concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan issues an order approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a detailed briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document also logs letters filed on Maxwell's behalf by Christian R. Everdell, as well as a letter from Sophia Papapetru and John Wallace regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00020491.jpg
A page from a legal document (Case 22-1426) dated July 8, 2022, listing the disposition of various criminal charges under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors, coercion, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury. Most counts listed on this page are marked as 'Dismissed,' with one specific count of Coercion/Enticement (labeled 2ss) marked as 'Acquitted by Jury.' The text contains original typos such as 'OFA MINOT' and 'MONOR'.
DOJ-OGR-00020485.jpg
This document is Page 8 of a criminal judgment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines the 'Schedule of Payments' for criminal monetary penalties, ordering an immediate lump sum payment of $300.00. It also stipulates that further payments will commence 30 days after her release from imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00020467.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from February 2022 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details several procedural orders regarding motions for a new trial, redactions to protect juror privacy, and the filing of an amicus brief. The most significant entry is an order granting an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, while denying a broader hearing involving other jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referencing SDNY Case 20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021, detailing proceedings in the case USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists filings related to various Motions in Limine regarding the exclusion of evidence (including items from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way), suppression of identification, and expert testimony. It also contains a court order establishing protocols for an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including COVID-19 measures and provisions for public and victim access via overflow rooms.
DOJ-OGR-00020445.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of filings entered on November 12, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily consist of numerous motions in limine filed by Maxwell's defense to exclude various pieces of evidence, testimony, and government exhibits, as well as motions and responses from the prosecution (USA). The docket also includes a memo endorsement by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020423.jpg
This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00020417.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) detailing filings and orders between April 20 and April 21, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include Judge Nathan questioning the defense on whether they are seeking to adjourn the July 12th trial date, potentially until January 2022, and demanding a specific justification if so. The docket also covers disputes over redactions involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and motions to dismiss the indictment based on a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.
DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg
This document is a court docket log from Case 22-1426, detailing filings and orders from late March 2021 in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment by the U.S. government, multiple letters and orders concerning redactions in court documents, motions related to subpoenas, and the payment of appeal fees. The log shows active litigation between Maxwell's defense team, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and the prosecution, all under the supervision of Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020395.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from July 9 to July 15, 2020. It details the arraignment held on July 14, 2020, where Maxwell pleaded Not Guilty via video conference due to COVID-19 protocols, and Judge Alison J. Nathan denied bail, remanding Maxwell to custody. The docket also records attorney appearances for the defense (Cohen, Everdell, Pagliuca) and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020394.jpg
This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00020389.jpg
This document is a court docket page (Page 3 of 91) from Case 22-1426 dated July 8, 2022. It details the legal representation (Mark Cohen and Bobbi Sternheim) and the disposition of charges against the defendant (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell), including a sentence of 240 months imprisonment and a $750,000 fine for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. Counts 1 and 5 were not entered into judgment as they were deemed multiplicitous.
DOJ-OGR-00018782.jpg
This document is page 184 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is cross-examining a witness named Carolyn regarding a complaint filed on her behalf by attorney Mr. Willits in 2008 against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully objects to the admission of defense exhibit C4 on the grounds that it is 'not inconsistent,' leading the defense to request a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018778.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning, led by Mr. Pagliuca, focuses on the timeline of the witness's interactions with the FBI in 2007 and her subsequent filing of two civil complaints in 2008 with the assistance of her lawyer, Richard Willits. The document ends with the attorney directing the witness to a specific prior deposition for review.
DOJ-OGR-00018490.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness McHugh) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on financial records, specifically 'Government Exhibit 502,' which is a premiere checking account statement belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell at the address of the 'New York Strategy Group.' The prosecution attempts to ask about a $5 million wire transfer to Maxwell dated September 18, 2002, but the defense (Mr. Everdell) successfully objects to the question as leading.
DOJ-OGR-00016311.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00016165.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues regarding the admissibility of communications between witnesses' lawyers (specifically mentioning Mr. Scarola) and the government, citing an email where Scarola suggested ten interview topics for a witness named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications and proffers are privileged or if they can be used as evidence regarding the 'cultivating of stories'.
DOJ-OGR-00016114.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The presiding judge outlines the procedure for finalizing jury selection, swearing in the jury, and commencing opening statements, with specific attention paid to social distancing rules for unvaccinated jurors. Attorneys Ms. Comey (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) are present, with Ms. Sternheim raising a protocol question regarding sidebars.
DOJ-OGR-00016100.jpg
This document is an image labeled as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 910' from a legal case identified as 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. It depicts an interior space featuring a grand wooden staircase with an ornate metal railing, several upholstered chairs, a table with decorative items including what appears to be a chess set, and various sculptures. The document also includes a unique identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00016100', suggesting its origin from the Department of Justice, Office of Government Relations.
DOJ-OGR-00016099.jpg
This document is a photograph of a building entrance, identified as Government Exhibit 909 in a legal case (S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)). The image shows a grand wooden door, stone facade, and features such as video surveillance, fire lane warnings, and a standpipe/sprinkler system connection. The document is marked with a DOJ-OGR identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00016094.jpg
This document is a Personnel Action Notice from The Mar-a-Lago Club regarding an employee named Sky Roberts. It records his hiring on April 11, 2000, for a maintenance position at a rate of $12.00. The document includes signatures from Human Resources and the Managing Director, with personal identifying information (SSN, address, phone) redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity