| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
A page from a deposition transcript involving a staff member (likely a housekeeper) describing their duties. The witness details making beds multiple times a day and cleaning the massage table. The witness confirms the presence of 'gallons' of massage oils and testifies that in their final year of employment, they observed items that looked like sex toys left in the sink on several occasions.
This document is an index page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. It indicates that a witness, Juan P. Alessi, was examined by Detective Recarey, with the examination starting on page 4. The document also states that no exhibits were marked and was transcribed by J. Consor & Associates.
This is the final page of a letter written by Alan Dershowitz. In the text, Dershowitz addresses an unknown recipient regarding the source of certain allegations, stating that if the source is not one of 'two women mentioned above,' he wishes to know the name to investigate further. He expresses a desire to resolve the matter. The letter is copied to Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a 2017 public records request date.
This is the final page of a letter from attorney Alan Dershowitz regarding unspecified allegations involving 'two women.' Dershowitz offers to investigate the claims further if the accusers are identified and copies the letter to Florida prosecutors Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss. The document was released as part of a DOJ Public Records Request in 2017.
This document is the final page of a letter written by Alan Dershowitz. He addresses an unnamed recipient regarding specific allegations, offering to investigate the source of claims if they do not originate from 'two women mentioned above.' The letter is copied to Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss, and appears to be part of a larger DOJ public records release dated July 26, 2017.
This document is an investigator's report from November 21, 2005, detailing a failed attempt to interview a young woman in Orange Park, Florida. The investigators, Bill Riley and Steve Kiraly, working on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, were met with extreme hostility by Mary Parker, the mother of the woman's boyfriend, who ordered them off her property and refused to cooperate.
This is an Incident Report from the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office dated January 21, 2006, regarding a Missing Person (Adult). The reporting officer is Christopher Bryant, and the incident occurred at 411 Christopher's Ct in Canton. The document lists an involved white female born in 1969 and a juvenile whose details are on a confidential page; no specific Epstein-related names are visible on this page, though it bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp.
A Cherokee County Sheriff's Office incident report dated November 24, 2005, detailing a disturbance at a residence in Waleska, Georgia. Officer Brooke Bedoya responded to a call from a resident (name redacted) who had confiscated tequila from local juveniles, including a male named James, who subsequently threatened to return to the property. While this document bears a DOJ footer typical of Epstein-related case releases, the specific content describes a local juvenile alcohol incident with no immediate textual link to Epstein or his associates visible on this page.
This document is a printout of a MySpace webpage, specifically page 2 of a friends list associated with user ID 76552710. The page displays seven thumbnail images of individuals, three of whom are marked as 'Online Now!', and was originally captured or dated June 13, 2006. The document bears official markings from a Department of Justice public records request (17-295) processed in 2017.
This document is a screenshot of a MySpace image page, accessed on June 13, 2006. It shows two comments on an unspecified image from users 'The Lucky One' and 'im that [x] SuNShINE', posted on June 11 and June 10, 2006, respectively. The comments are informal and suggest a friendly, social relationship with the profile's owner.
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for a user with the display name 'YA FUCK YOU 2!!!!!!' and the URL username 'lovelysaige'. The profile indicates the user is located in the United States and their last login was on June 13, 2006. The document footer contains a public records request number and a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
This document is the final page of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that a plea to felony aggravated assault for his client is unwarranted and risks a sex offender classification. He proposes that, based on witness credibility issues, psycho-sexual evaluations, and lie detector tests, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is the most appropriate resolution.
A legal letter from defense attorney Jack A. Goldberger arguing against the prosecution of his client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein). Goldberger attempts to discredit the accuser ('this girl') by citing her drug use and claiming she lied about her age (claiming 18) and that 'no sex occurred,' only a topless massage for $200. He urges the recipient (likely the State Attorney's office) to pursue an 'informal resolution' rather than filing charges, citing the permanent reputational damage caused by internet searches.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated January 2, 2008. It confirms service or address to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach and is signed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. The document bears Department of Justice Bates stamps and public records request identifiers from 2017.
This document is a single page (page 52) from an address book or contact list, released by the DOJ. It lists individuals alphabetically by last name, specifically the 'R' section, including prominent figures such as Charlie Rose (listed with Amanda Burder), Peter Thomas Roth, and members of the Rothchild (Rothschild) and Ronson families. All specific contact details (phone numbers/addresses) have been redacted for privacy.
This legal document is a court filing from April 24, 2020, discussing a motion by an individual named Thomas. The court denies Thomas's request for discovery related to his claim of selective or discriminatory prosecution, finding he has not met the high burden of proof required. The court dismisses Thomas's comparison to a 2005/2006 incident involving other officers, stating it is not relevant because Thomas is charged with making false statements, not with failing to conduct counts.
This legal document, page 30 of a court filing from April 24, 2020, outlines the stringent legal standard a defendant must meet to successfully claim selective prosecution. Citing several legal precedents like Armstrong and Alameh, it explains that a defendant must provide clear evidence of both a 'discriminatory effect' (showing similarly situated individuals were not prosecuted) and a 'discriminatory purpose' (showing the prosecution was motivated by impermissible factors like race or religion). The document also specifies the evidentiary threshold required to even obtain discovery on such a claim.
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 24, 2020, arguing against a motion by defendant Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein case) to disclose draft versions of an Inspector General's Report regarding the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The text argues that such drafts do not yet exist and, even if they did, would be protected by the 'deliberative process privilege.' The document cites numerous legal precedents to support the claim that pre-decisional government documents are shielded from discovery.
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an argument regarding the scope of the government's discovery obligations. It cites several legal precedents (Brady, Giglio, Avellino, Kyles, Barcelo) to argue that a prosecutor's duty to disclose information is limited to materials in their possession or the possession of the 'prosecution team' (e.g., investigating officers), and does not extend to information held by separate, uninvolved government entities.
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 35) from case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It contains the Government's legal argument opposing discovery requests made by the defendant, Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein jail case). The Government argues that Thomas's requests are irrelevant to the charges and are instead an attempt to 'garner sympathy' and argue 'jury nullification,' citing various legal precedents to support the exclusion of such evidence.
This document is page 'iii' of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 24, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (which corresponds to USA v. Parnas et al., though released in a DOJ OGR batch). It lists numerous legal precedents (case law citations) primarily from the Second Circuit and Southern District of New York, referencing cases such as U.S. v. Coppa, U.S. v. Ghailani, and others used to support legal arguments in the main brief.
This document contains the final page of minutes from a Labor Management Relations (LMR) meeting between MCC New York Management and Union Local 3148, filed in the court case against Epstein guards (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). The text highlights significant tensions regarding understaffing in the Special Housing Unit (SHU), with the Union threatening to report management to Internal Affairs if staff are forced to conduct operations violating agency policy during shortages. Several agenda items, including 'Overtime Hiring' and 'Lieutenant Medina,' were listed but not discussed.
A page from a court transcript filed on February 10, 2020, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense attorney Mr. Foy is arguing for an adjournment of proceedings, citing the need for further investigation and a scheduling conflict with another trial set to begin July 20 before Judge Ramos at 40 Foley Square. Foy notes that the other trial involves a client facing a mandatory life sentence who has been incarcerated for nearly two years.
This document is page 3 of a court order (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 16, 2019. It outlines protocols for handling 'Protected Materials' during discovery, specifically defining authorized personnel (legal staff, experts, jury consultants) who may access the data. It also establishes rules for showing materials to 'Fact Witnesses' without providing them copies, and mandates the destruction or return of materials to the Government upon the case's conclusion.
This document is page 4 of 5 from a court filing filed on December 16, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It outlines legal procedures for the defendant regarding the handling of discovery material in public filings, specifically mandating that such material be filed under seal or that the Government be notified to allow for redaction discussions. If the parties cannot agree on redactions, they must seek Court resolution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity