DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00028234.jpg
This document is a TECSII passenger activity log dated April 28, 2014, showing a query history for Jeffrey E. Epstein. It details six Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) queries from January and February 2011, associated with his date of birth (01/20/1953) and document number (469911707), referencing travel locations including 'Ataturk' and 'Unknown Airport'.
DOJ-OGR-00028225.jpg
This document is a TECSII Primary Query History report dated April 28, 2014, detailing passenger activity queries for Jeffrey E. Epstein (DOB 01/20/1953). It lists six queries made between May and July 2013 against his travel document (469911707), associated with locations including West Palm Beach, Long Island MacArthur, Ataturk, and Teterboro. The queries are noted as 'INSP: APIS QRY', indicating they are related to the Advance Passenger Information System.
DOJ-OGR-00028215.jpg
This is a TECSII Passenger Activity report generated on April 28, 2014, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's travel history in 2005. It lists six specific customs entries via air travel between January and September 2005, primarily into Palm Beach International, with one entry into Cyril E. King International in the US Virgin Islands. The document lists specific travel document numbers (likely passports) and contains numerous redactions regarding inspector details and system codes.
DOJ-OGR-00028207.jpg
This document is a TECSII system passenger activity log, dated April 28, 2014, detailing six instances of air travel queries for Jeffrey Epstein during 2008. All listed activities are associated with CBP pre-clearance in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, and include specific dates, times, and reference codes, though some details are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00028206.jpg
This document is a TECSII Passenger Activity report generated on April 28, 2014. It lists specific travel entries for Jeffrey Epstein into St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (Preclearance) during the first half of 2010 (January through May). The report details the date, time, and specific processing lanes (JK21, EY05, EY09) for each entry, while redacting the names of the inspecting officers.
DOJ-OGR-00028195.jpg
This document is a TECSII passenger activity log for Jeffrey Epstein, generated on April 28, 2014. It lists six separate air travel events processed by U.S. Customs between October and December 2013, primarily through St. Thomas and Cyril E. King International Airport in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
DOJ-OGR-00017791.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Jane's exact age (13 vs 14) when she first met Jeffrey Epstein, referencing prior statements made to the government and court filings.
DOJ-OGR-00017681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a statement Jane made to the government on February 27, 2020, where she admitted she was 'not sure' if she had ever been alone in a room with just Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, contradicting or challenging her current memory.
DOJ-OGR-00015632.jpg
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 306 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows an unidentified woman with short dark hair relaxing on the back of a yacht in a sunny, coastal location. The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00015632.
DOJ-OGR-00015623.jpg
This document is a U.S. government evidence photograph, Exhibit 294 from case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image displays an open cardboard box containing two packaged products labeled "Twin Torpedos." The surrounding area includes a Kmart shopping bag, a pair of sneakers, and a small piece of paper that appears to be a receipt.
DOJ-OGR-00015090.jpg
A page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the unsealing of grand jury materials. The defense argues that because the grand jury convened only five years prior and Ghislaine Maxwell is still actively litigating her case (including a pending Supreme Court petition), releasing the materials would cause irrevocable reputational harm and taint the legal process. The filing explicitly notes that while Epstein is dead, Maxwell is alive, distinguishing this case from others where secrecy is no longer needed due to the death of principal parties.
DOJ-OGR-00015070.jpg
This document is page 9 of a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 29, 2025, regarding the unsealing of Epstein and Maxwell grand jury materials. The Government confirms it has reviewed the transcripts and notified all but one relevant victim (whom they could not reach) about the motion to unseal. Additionally, the Government is submitting indices, transcripts, and proposed redactions to the Court *ex parte* and under seal to protect victim identities.
DOJ-OGR-00015019.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It documents the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding 'Exhibit 6,' a study on barriers to and facilitators of delayed disclosure in abuse cases. The witness defends their opinion as being based on the totality of their professional experience rather than a single article.
DOJ-OGR-00014973.jpg
Transcript page from the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). The witness confirms possession of his engagement agreement and time logs, prompting defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca to request immediate production of the file. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz responds that the government has already fulfilled its Jencks Act obligations by producing notes from meetings and calls with the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00014887.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their graduate studies and a predoctoral fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine, focusing on their experience treating patients with severe mental health issues, traumatic stress, and childhood violence.
DOJ-OGR-00008656.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 28) filed on December 18, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the 'Third Element' of Count Six: Sex Trafficking of an Individual Under the Age of 18. The instruction clarifies that the Government must prove Maxwell knew the victim, identified as 'Carolyn,' would be caused to engage in commercial sex acts, and explicitly states that the victim's consent is not a defense if she was under 18.
DOJ-OGR-00008629.jpg
This document is page 91 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 4, which advises the jury that statements made by counsel (arguments, objections) and the court (rulings, sidebars) are not evidence, and that the jury's own recollection of the evidence controls the verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00008625.jpg
This document is a specific page (page 87 of 167) from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It serves as a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions, listing instructions 49 through 59, covering topics such as the defendant's right not to testify, evidence from searches, electronic communications, and jury conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00008616.jpg
This document is a jury instruction, specifically Instruction No. 56, from a legal case filed on December 18, 2021. It instructs the jury on how to handle redacted evidentiary items, defining 'redacted' and directing them to only consider the visible parts of the evidence without speculating on the reasons for the redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00008596.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021, which appears to be jury instructions. The text explains the legal doctrine of "conscious avoidance," instructing the jury on how they can find that a defendant acted knowingly if she deliberately avoided learning the truth about her involvement in unlawful conduct or a conspiracy. It clarifies that while conscious avoidance can establish knowledge of a conspiracy's objective, it cannot substitute for the finding that the defendant knowingly and intentionally joined the conspiracy itself.
DOJ-OGR-00008579.jpg
This document is page 41 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 18, 2021. It contains legal instructions outlining the standards for 'aiding and abetting,' specifically clarifying that mere presence or knowledge of a crime is insufficient for conviction; the Government must prove the defendant took willful action to help the crime succeed. The page ends with the first of a series of questions for the jury to consider regarding Maxwell's participation.
DOJ-OGR-00008544.jpg
This document is a table of contents from a legal filing, specifically page 6 of Document 563 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. It outlines the structure of jury instructions for various criminal counts, including enticement, transportation of a minor, sex trafficking, conspiracy, and other legal concepts like aiding and abetting and conscious avoidance.
DOJ-OGR-00008542.jpg
This document is page 4 of 167 from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It is a table of contents for jury instructions, listing instructions numbered 23 through 45, which cover topics such as sex trafficking, conspiracy, aiding and abetting, and rules of evidence like witness credibility.
DOJ-OGR-00008504.jpg
This legal document, page 48 of a court filing from December 17, 2021, appears to be part of jury instructions in a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. It clarifies the legal standard for finding someone guilty of conspiracy, stating that the prosecution does not need to prove the defendant knew all details, all participants, or was involved from the start. The text emphasizes that as long as Ms. Maxwell was aware of the conspiracy's criminal aims and knowingly participated, even in a limited capacity, she can be held responsible for all acts of the conspiracy during her membership.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity