DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00004808.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 1, 2021, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that statements made to the media by defense appellate counsel, Mr. Markus, violate Local Rule 23.1. The filing specifically cites a recent Op-Ed where Markus compared his client's case to Bill Cosby's, arguing these extrajudicial comments are designed to prejudice potential jurors and interfere with a fair trial. The Government asserts that relief is warranted to prevent further prejudicial statements.
DOJ-OGR-00004802.jpg
This page is from a legal ruling in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The court rejects arguments for suppression under 'Franks,' ruling that even if the Government failed to disclose a 2016 meeting with the law firm BSF to Judge McMahon, she would still have granted the modification of the protective order due to 'extraordinary circumstances' and 'significant public interest.' The text establishes that protective orders do not guarantee immunity from criminal subpoenas.
DOJ-OGR-00004790.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 307) by the Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 25, 2021. The text argues that the Government did not violate Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights by obtaining and using her deposition transcripts from a previous civil case. It cites Second Circuit precedent to establish that civil protective orders do not guarantee protection against the use of testimony in subsequent criminal prosecutions.
DOJ-OGR-00004722.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a defendant's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of an indictment. The document asserts that the charges, which involve the sexual abuse of a minor, are timely filed under the statute of limitations (18 U.S.C. § 3283) because the victim is still alive. It also states that the court has previously rejected the defendant's legal arguments regarding the applicability of the statute and its retroactivity.
DOJ-OGR-00004715.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 295) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on May 25, 2021. The text presents a legal argument by the prosecution distinguishing the current case from the precedent set in *Annabi*, *Abbamonte*, and *Alessi* regarding the Double Jeopardy Clause and plea agreements. The prosecution argues that Maxwell cannot claim Double Jeopardy protections because she was not previously prosecuted for the offenses listed in the S2 Indictment, and disputes her interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
DOJ-OGR-00004709.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 295) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines the arguments to be made in the filing, which address several motions from the defendant, including arguments related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, double jeopardy, pre-trial delay, and the disclosure of statements from 'Minor Victim-4'.
DOJ-OGR-00004694.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, specifically Grand Jury testimony (MM20-GJ TESTIMONY-000356), filed on May 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The entire substantive content of the page (lines 1-25) has been redacted. It was produced by Official Reporting Service, LLC.
DOJ-OGR-00004691.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential testimony transcript, filed on May 25, 2021. The testimony discusses an unnamed female's contact with Jeffrey Epstein, which reportedly began around 2003 when she was 15 and lasted until 2005. The transcript also mentions a contact dated March 1, 2003, which was signed by one of Epstein's employees.
DOJ-OGR-00004689.jpg
This document is a transcript of a grand jury testimony from May 25, 2021. A witness states that she stopped providing massages to Mr. Epstein when she was 16, around the time he asked her to bring 'younger friends'. The testimony also references FedEx records corroborating that Mr. Epstein sent packages, including a 'Massage for Dummies' book, to a residence associated with the events.
DOJ-OGR-00004686.jpg
This document is a transcript of grand jury testimony from a case filed on May 25, 2021. A witness testifies that Mr. Epstein asked her to recruit other girls, specifically inquiring about 'younger friends', to perform massages and offered to pay her $100 for each person she brought. The testimony also mentions an instance where Mr. Epstein wanted someone to come to his residence to have their picture taken.
DOJ-OGR-00004685.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential Grand Jury testimony transcript filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness testifies about a redacted individual whose primary role was scheduling massages for Mr. Epstein, sometimes from New York, and escorting the massage provider from the kitchen to the upstairs bedroom. The testimony explicitly describes a sexual encounter involving Mr. Epstein, a redacted individual, and an unidentified female introduced by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004681.jpg
This document is a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. In it, a witness explains that administrative subpoenas were issued to telecommunication companies to acquire cell phone records. These records are intended to show 'telephonic contact' between Mr. Epstein's assistants and multiple 'Jane Does,' which constitute 'Overt Acts' listed in an indictment being presented to the grand jury.
DOJ-OGR-00004680.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned by a grand juror and Ms. Villafana about airport codes (ISM, PBIA, PBI) related to a subject's travel to the Palm Beach County area. The questioning also references a specific telephone call made on April 23, 2004, between two redacted individuals, as part of the 'Overt Acts' being discussed.
DOJ-OGR-00004679.jpg
This document is a transcript from a grand jury testimony filed on May 25, 2021. In the excerpt, a juror questions the relevance of travel itineraries, prompting Ms. Villafana to explain that the travel dates directly correlate with the dates the subject of the investigation met with victims. This connection is presented as key to understanding the 'travel count' in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00004675.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript of grand jury testimony filed on May 25, 2021. In it, a witness confirms the location of Mr. Epstein's New York residence as 9 East 71st Street. The questioner then directs the witness to testify about the high schools attended by the 'various victims' involved in the case, referencing specific paragraphs of a proposed indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00004674.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript, filed on May 25, 2021. In the transcript, a questioner directs a witness to a document labeled 'Overt Two' and a summary chart on its second page. The witness confirms they have seen the document and understand its contents, which appear to relate to their prior testimony, though specific details are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00004672.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript from a grand jury proceeding, filed on May 25, 2021. An unnamed speaker is explaining an 'aid' document to the jury, which links specific grand jury testimony pages to 'Overt Acts' and 'substantive counts'. The testimony concerns an unnamed female's activities and her connection to 'Mr. Epstein and his assistants', with the speaker referencing their own prior testimony from May 8, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00004669.jpg
This document is a confidential transcript of a grand jury testimony, filed on May 25, 2021. The testimony reveals that subpoenas were issued to Amazon.com, Federal Express, and theaters to obtain order, shipping, and ticketing records. A witness explains to a grand juror that this information was gathered not to establish a defendant's location, but as 'corroborating evidence' for testimony previously provided by individuals referred to as 'the girls'.
DOJ-OGR-00004631.jpg
This document is page 5 of a plea/non-prosecution agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It details sentencing timelines (late 2007/early 2008), rules regarding 'gain time' in Florida custody, and a mutual anticipation that the agreement would remain secret from the public record. Crucially, it contains the controversial clause granting immunity from federal criminal charges to any 'potential co-conspirators of Epstein,' with specific names redacted, and suspends the federal Grand Jury investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg
This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00031131.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview conducted by 'MP' with a redacted witness. The witness describes giving a massage to a male subject who manipulated the situation to watch her walk while partially naked (wearing a thong). The encounter ended when the subject abruptly stopped the massage, left the room, and was heard making 'sex noises' nearby.
DOJ-OGR-00031124.jpg
This document is a single page (Page 18 of 43 internal, Page 32 of 81 total) from a transcript of an interview conducted by 'MP' with a redacted witness. The witness describes the layout of a room upon entering a property, specifically noting a counter, refrigerator, island, and a glass sliding window that looks out at a pool. The interviewer clarifies the physical description 'for the tape purposes,' indicating this is a formal recorded interview, likely part of a Department of Justice investigation given the footer markings.
DOJ-OGR-00031120.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview with a woman named Saige, dated July 26, 2017. Saige recounts her recent interactions with another woman, Haley, which involved discussing a rich man, watching a movie at Haley's house, and making plans to go shopping with an expected payment of $300. The transcript concludes with Saige describing how Haley, accompanied by an unnamed female friend, came to pick her up the next day.
DOJ-OGR-00025442.jpg
This document is an email header dated July 24, 2019, regarding Inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) being on suicide watch. The sender and recipient identities are redacted, and the document contains no body text, only metadata and attachment filenames.
DOJ-OGR-00025436.jpg
This document is a timeline report detailing the final hours of Jeffrey Epstein's life on August 9th and 10th. It notes procedural failures, specifically that he was left without a cellmate despite being on 'PSYCH Alert' and that required checks after midnight were not performed. The text concludes with the discovery of his unresponsive body at 6:33 a.m. and his pronouncement of death at 7:36 a.m.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity